• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Interisting claim

That I saw the buildings fall on live TV, that Kevin Cosgrove was still talking to the fire dispatcher on his phone as the collapse began means no EMP ANYWHERE.
 
an EMP would have effected the cameras and other equipment. Even if it were a mild EMP, it would have the biggest effect on RF devices which have antennas which are connected to the sensitive internals. It would have flooded tuners, to say the least.

But no... the whole thing on live tv. Microwave links to choppers and remote cameras. Numerous satellite uplinks. And none of it was effected. Hardly what you'd expect from even a brief or mild emp.

And I know several people who lived within a mile of it. None of their cars exploded. None of the cars parked near them exploded. The only cars I know of being on fire or severely damaged are the ones hit by something.
 
leftysergeant said:
That I saw the buildings fall on live TV, that Kevin Cosgrove was still talking to the fire dispatcher on his phone as the collapse began means no EMP ANYWHERE.
Click to expand...

You do realize what this means...

They filmed it all on a sound stage in New Mexico!!
 
SpaceMonkeyZero said:
You do realize what this means...

They filmed it all on a sound stage in New Mexico!!
Click to expand...

Unfortunately the first real commercial sound-state in New Mexico was finished this year (2007). There were no better-than-poor quality sound-stages prior to then.
 
The points raised here, is exactly what I brought up with the blogger and his supporters at this page -
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8009371&postID=5303465797648168303&isPopup=true

So in their defence, they claim it was a limited EMP. Didn't go further than the buildings! Oh and the camera's were too far away. Also any camera that was too close was confiscated. Really?

If this stuff wasn't so laughable, I'd actually have lost my temper by now!
 
buka001 said:
The points raised here, is exactly what I brought up with the blogger and his supporters at this page -
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8009371&postID=5303465797648168303&isPopup=true

So in their defence, they claim it was a limited EMP. Didn't go further than the buildings! Oh and the camera's were too far away. Also any camera that was too close was confiscated. Really?

If this stuff wasn't so laughable, I'd actually have lost my temper by now!
Click to expand...

Okay, so the EMP was tiny and limited. That's possible. Hell, you can make a teeny-tiny emp with a little capacitor and a coil of wire...

But despite being small enough that it didn't make cameras a few hundred feet away even loose tracking for a second or the phones drop the calls...

It was also powerful enough to induce such strong currents in cars within a mile of the event that it either heated the metal to the flash point of the gasoline in the tanks, or produced some extreme arcing and currents thus causing them to explode.

I'm sure you can explode a car with enough of an EMP. I mean with enough electromagnetic energy you could theoretically tear the very atoms apart and impart so much energy into something that it's turned into a plasma.

Of course... that seems like it would prolly mess with the tv cameras. But then again, what do I know? I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
 
We only have to take it one step further in order to accuse the NWO and the tripods of working together to make the EMP blast.
 
Aren't EMPs produced when a nuclear bomb detonates in the ionoshpere? I thought it was suddenly moving around all those ions that caused the EM pulse.
 
I keep getting confused because the acronym is too close to the thing that catches recordings of ghosts and the band that sang "Unbelievable." :mad:
 
CurtC said:
Aren't EMPs produced when a nuclear bomb detonates in the ionoshpere? I thought it was suddenly moving around all those ions that caused the EM pulse.
Click to expand...

Generally yes, that's where they come from. If you detonate a nuke at ground level you get a modest EMP, but you don't need to worry about it, because if you're close enough to be damaged by that you've got worse things to worry about. Otherwise it might cause a burst of static on your radio or something. Kinda like lightning does.

You don't need a nuke to make an emp though. You need a nuke to make a really big one, but it can be simulated by discharging a lot of pulse capacitors. Of course, that's going to be nowehre near a nuke emp, so it's not going to effect stuff that isn't right there...

But I suppose if the 'gobment wanted to spend billions and billions on a massive pulsed power system with superconducting energy storage coils and capacitors with dielectrics made of unobtanium and stuff... And they built this over the course of several decades under the WTC with the antisipation of setting it off in 2001, just to be bastardly and because they didn't want to use some conventional means...

well yeah... I suppose in theory you could. But also, monkeys could fly out of my butt.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom