Intelligent (BAD) design.

Renfield said:
Woodguard has got the conch, Piggy. I didn't notice you asking for it.
Click to expand...
Jack said the conch don't count on this side of the island.

Everybody heard him.

Didn't they?

<nervously wipes specs on shreds of shirt>
 
woodguard said:
I don’t think a person should died from a rupture appendix, for one. This to me is a design flaw.

If a designer designed one thing, then everything is designed.

I thought ID was possible but it falls apart very quickly if you add everything. The good and the bad.

If their was a designer, human life and comform was not on her list.
Click to expand...

My favorite quote on design, from the late WinAce:

“Without evolution, what reason is there to suppose a bat’s wing—meant for flying—will have more similarity to a hoof than any bird’s wing, also meant for flying? What reason is there to suppose shark and dolphin flippers, which function identically and can look similar enough to fool mariners, are much more different—on the inside—than a dolphin's flipper and a human hand, which have totally different ‘purposes’?

“Evolution answers this. The common ancestor of all mammals had a paw, and no matter which environment its descendants moved into, all of their paws/claws/feet/wings/flippers/hooves are obvious modifications of that original structure—muscle groups, bone and all. The same answer applies to vestiges. And this, along with a huge number of other experimental consequences, is perfectly logical and downright expected if evolution is true.”
-- Allan Glenn

************************************************
The Bible of the Good and Moral Atheist
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom