Yes I do get to do that because what you are doing is the definition of a strawman fallacy... do you know what strawmanning means... do you know what quoting means?
The definition of a strawman fallacy isn't, "not an exact quote".
Please point out specifically what parts of my summary misrepresent you're position.
"The OP assures us that Christians keep telling us that they reject the concept of infinity."
Which part did you not actually claim? And don't complain that I used different syntax than you, show me fundamentally how your statement differs from my summary.
Have you ever heard of Muslims or Jewish apologists or any other theistic casuists??
Yes, and I've also heard of Christians. Remember your first sentence stated that "Christian
and other apologists and casuists keep telling us that infinity is a nonsense concept that is not in reality". That "and" is a problem for you. It means that you can't just brush them aside and say, "well, Christians don't count because I want to talk about other religions now". You included Christians, so you have to deal with them as well.
Do you know what is an apologist or a casuist?
Yes, and I didn't even need to use a thesaurus.
Here have a look how wrong you are...
QED!!!
And
Temporal finitism
ETA: And have you read the list in
this post?
.
You're just doing what I said you would: "If you dig deep enough you can probably find a handful of Christians who hold personal interpretations that involve some apologetics regarding the concept of infinity, but most Christians believe that God is infinite, that his power is infinite, that his knowledge is infinite, and that his creation is infinite."
Change "Christian" to any other religion and you have the same thing - some obscure sophistries that aren't representative of the majority, and certainly nothing that they "keep telling us".
