• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Hypnotism?

-42-

Thinker
Joined
Apr 13, 2005
Messages
153
Just some questions regarding this....

I can understand why "Past Life" regression or "Alien Abduction" or "Child Molestation" or "Criminal/Police" Hypnosis issues are 'issues' because of 'suggestability' or other things so I don't really want comments on THAT, but I don't really have much - beyond basic - knowledge of Hypnosis, but here is what I witnessed recently at a Renisannce Festival.

(By the way, at the Festival someone wondered if the 'Psychic' there was a 'real psychic' or a 'paid actor/fake'. I opened my mouth but didn't know what to say initially, rofl, though I know what THEY meant. I ending up saying "How would you tell?"..)

Anyway... Hypnosis.

The show begins with this: The Hypnotist explaining that it is a state of suggestability. He also states that those under 16 cannot be hypnotised because they are always in a "hypnotic state". He also states people who are drunk or under an IQ of 50 cannot be hypnotised. (?)

He then explains suggestability and illustrates it, by biting in a lemon - squirting juice everywhere as he does so and says how he hates doing that and asks if the audience could feel it or salivate because of it.

(On his 2nd show, I got a position slightly behind him, and saw it was a yellow rubber shell, filled with water, shaped like a lemon.. and he squeezed it when he bit it and covered it with a rag...... not really relating to what he stated or showed, just that I was curious - got a magician background - about him biting into a lemon 5 times a day...lol.. Irrelevent, though)

He then instructs everyone in the audience to extend arms out, straight, maing fists in both hands and pressing them together "as hard as you can". He then talks for around 30-45 seconds.

(I didn't actually do it, because I knew what was coming. A very common physical response. For example, you can do the same thing in a doorway. Stand in a doorway, and press the top of your hands against both sides and try your hardest to press your hands against the frame. After 30-45 seconds, move out from the doorway and your hands seem to 'float' upwards when you try to raise them very slightly.)

During those 30-45 seconds, he was talking about pretending your hands were magnets. And that they were drawn to each other. Harder and harder, they were drawn no matter what you did.

He then said to place the hands on your knees and asked those who still felt the magnetism to raise their hands. It is those people he selected to go to the stage.

Here is my first question:

Not knowing much about the subject, I assume he's doing that to select people who actually might believe it is magnetism that is drawing the hands? Surely everyone who participated 'felt' it, but disbelieved the 'magnetism' aspect? ie: People who believe his suggestion?
I recall reading something, somewhere, that stated people who look at a black wall while you are hypnotising them are more likely to be hypnotised if you say "Now you see a red light start to appear" (and actually shine a red light, without their knowledge). Is this what he was doing there, sort of?

He then selects around 12-14 people who raise their hands.

He explains then that "everyone can be hypnotised" but that given the time available to him, he will periodically tell some of those 12-14 people to sit down if it does not work on them within the time alloted.
-----
I'll do this part briefly, during which he asked for minimal sounds or movement from the crowd: Elapsed time was around 10 minutes.
-He instructs them to look at a crystal ball.
-Instructs how to breathe (slowly)
-Liquid Relaxation flowing through you
-Flowing more into the feet, then shins, then knees, then hips, pelvis, body, chest, neck, head, lips, head, eyes.
-Eyelids heavy, they close.
-When you feel a touch on your wrist, flow 10x deeper into relax (touches each person on wrist)
-When you feel a touch on your shoulder, flow 10x deeper into relaxation. (touches each person on shoulder)
-When you feel a touch on your head, flow 10x deeper into relaxation. (touches each perosn on head)


After that:
- Instructs them to raise their left hand. And that it is like steel. It cannot be moved or budged. It is a beam of steal. He then moves to each person, testing how rigid their arm is. He tells 2 people to sit down. Not immediately apparent to me as to why.

After that:
- Instructs that sounds they hear will increase their relaxation 10x.
- Instructs one specific person they can open their eyes and that it will not effect their state. Repeats this and has people move around and change position. He has 1-2 people return to their seats..... Again, not apparent as to why.

After that:
Starts with actual 'show' where he tells people he is giving them a drink of 'happy juice' which makes them feel extremely drunk, though not feeling sick at all. Repeats this a few times, while asking them questions about how they like it. He has 1-2 people return to seats.

After that:
Has more 'fun' with people, such as telling everyone the person next to them smells extremely bad. Also having people react to certain word with certain behavior. (ie: You hear the word hypnosis you 'bark')

Also having people forget numbers, such as forgetting the number 7, then having them count out their fingers, skipping the number 7 and arriving at 11 fingers.
-Alot of other things, but along the same lines.



Now, I guess I'm curious as to how much is playing along and how much is being under the hypnotist suggestion? I have a feeling if I lied about the 'magnetism' I could certainly go up there and follow all the instructions and be funny..... but... how much is 'playing along' or the 'act'? What exactly can be done in that state, is it simply like being asleep while awake? What if he had told someone to strip naked? What about take this knife and stab the other person? I dunno... maybe I should have lied about the first part to get on stage to try it for myself ;p

Can that state actually be used to plant lasting suggestions? I'm sure we've all heard about 'quitting smoking' through hypnotism and the such....

Hmm.

/Shrug
 
A widespread view amongst experimental psychologists who have done laboratory studies of "hypnosis" is that it is role playing. From what we have been shown in the media and from what the hypnotist tells us, we know that we can do what the hypnotist tells us to do, safely and without blame for our actions. To some extent, at least.
Stage hypnosis should be carefully distinguished from what is called "clinical" hypnosis. In stage hypnosis, people who would walk around and cluck like a chicken in front of 100 people eagerly volunteer for the oportunity and then the most compliant (those who are told that their hands are glued together and demonstrate that they can't separate them) are told do do silly things.
Clinical hypnosis does not work for permanently changing bad habits, such as smoking.
Hypnosis generally doesn't improve memory and can distort eyewiness testimony.
 
I used to think my father and myself were unusual because we were completely resistant to hypnosis. Amateur or professional, neither of us would in the least respond to hypnotic states. Even though I wanted to 'be hypnotized', it just never worked that way.

Turns out, I guess, that I've been secretly skeptic of it all along, maybe?

I also wonder if that's why those I've known who claim to 'have ghosts in their home' swear my very presence drives the ghosts away.

Anyway, I've seen some pretty convincing hypnotisms done - I've even done one myself, which should tell everyone that it is not what it seems to be. Caused a past-life regression in the subject, too... what was interesting, though, was the utter mundacity and dullness of the regression. The guy wasn't a general or a king or a slave or anything adventurous; he was a grunt in WWI. Not even any issues to deal with - just, you know, there.

And to this day, the subject swears not to remember any of it.

I guess the power of suggestion works best internally, huh?
 
Just some questions regarding this....

I can understand why "Past Life" regression or "Alien Abduction" or "Child Molestation" or "Criminal/Police" Hypnosis issues are 'issues' because of 'suggestability' or other things so I don't really want comments on THAT,...
Well, you're getting one anyway :-) 'cos it goes to the centre of the issue.

Hypnotic "suggestability" has never been proven to be a real phenomenon within what seems to be little more than a pleasantly relaxed state of focussed attention and a better term might be "(psycho-social) sensitivity".

It's likely to be two very different people who are "sensitive" to separate commercials for the latest boy-band CD or orchestra/classical music CD but the quality of the commercial and the CD cover will still effect sales.

So while 'hypnotic suggestion' is a good (and accurate term) - it's just that, a 'suggestion' that can be accepted or rejected.

As for the whole 'false/recoverd memory' thing, I'm very skeptical. It's obvious to us all that declarative memory is unrealiable but it's a very different thing from episodic memory. We might very easily say "Were you at that party when so and so did such and such?" but we don't forget the actual event itself. My view is that a lot of confabulation occurs when someone who already believes in such things as alien abduction/past lives encounters a therapist who is open to such accounts.
The show begins with this: The Hypnotist explaining that it is a state of suggestability. He also states that those under 16 cannot be hypnotised because they are always in a "hypnotic state". He also states people who are drunk or under an IQ of 50 cannot be hypnotised. (?)
Gibberish, gibberish and gibberish. We can all enter a relaxed state of focussed attention. The only reasons why you wouldn't work with people who are very young, very old or drunk are the obvious ones - young kids are too excitable and unfocussed, the elderly might be hard of hearing or senile and drunks are drunk.
He then explains suggestability and illustrates it, by biting in a lemon - squirting juice everywhere as he does so and says how he hates doing that and asks if the audience could feel it or salivate because of it.
Nothing unusual. Imagine (strongly enough) biting into a lemon and you'll salivate. Same if you image eating a delicious meal or fantasise about your dream sexual partner. It's just psychophysiology.
(On his 2nd show, I got a position slightly behind him, and saw it was a yellow rubber shell, filled with water, shaped like a lemon.. and he squeezed it when he bit it and covered it with a rag...... not really relating to what he stated or showed, just that I was curious - got a magician background - about him biting into a lemon 5 times a day...lol.. Irrelevent, though)
Well, I'm not a stage-hypnotist, but unless this routine was loaded with one-liners it's not really very good in my estimation.
He then instructs everyone in the audience to extend arms out, straight, maing fists in both hands and pressing them together "as hard as you can". He then talks for around 30-45 seconds.
Cramp
(I didn't actually do it, because I knew what was coming. A very common physical response. For example, you can do the same thing in a doorway. Stand in a doorway, and press the top of your hands against both sides and try your hardest to press your hands against the frame. After 30-45 seconds, move out from the doorway and your hands seem to 'float' upwards when you try to raise them very slightly.)
Exactly. This isn't anywhere as painful a real cramp but it's still to do with the muscles of the shoulders contracting after you walk out of the doorway, yes.
During those 30-45 seconds, he was talking about pretending your hands were magnets. And that they were drawn to each other. Harder and harder, they were drawn no matter what you did.
So, he didn't actually have the audience clasp their hands together? Interesting.
He then said to place the hands on your knees and asked those who still felt the magnetism to raise their hands. It is those people he selected to go to the stage.
These things are known as convincers. My favourite is to have people close their eyes and hold out both arms visualising a helium baloon tied to one arm and a heavy bag of shopping tied to the other. Most people, upon opening their eyes will notice that their arms are at different degrees from their bodies.
Here is my first question: Not knowing much about the subject, I assume he's doing that to select people who actually might believe it is magnetism that is drawing the hands? Surely everyone who participated 'felt' it, but disbelieved the 'magnetism' aspect? ie: People who believe his suggestion?
I recall reading something, somewhere, that stated people who look at a black wall while you are hypnotising them are more likely to be hypnotised if you say "Now you see a red light start to appear" (and actually shine a red light, without their knowledge). Is this what he was doing there, sort of?
It's just a convincer about mind/body effects. As for the black wall/red light thing... I've never even heard of it and, again, anyone can go into a relaxed state of focussed attention as verified by the multitude of self-hypnosis tapes available.
He then selects around 12-14 people who raise their hands.

<snip>

After that:
Has more 'fun' with people, such as telling everyone the person next to them smells extremely bad. Also having people react to certain word with certain behavior. (ie: You hear the word hypnosis you 'bark')

Also having people forget numbers, such as forgetting the number 7, then having them count out their fingers, skipping the number 7 and arriving at 11 fingers.
-Alot of other things, but along the same lines.

Now, I guess I'm curious as to how much is playing along and how much is being under the hypnotist suggestion? I have a feeling if I lied about the 'magnetism' I could certainly go up there and follow all the instructions and be funny..... but... how much is 'playing along' or the 'act'?
It's all audience participation and nothing more. Some people imagine that stage-hypnotists need confidants in the audience or that people are drunk (which can/does lower inhibitions) but that's completely unnecessary. Participants in stage shows are all usually twenty/thirty-somethings having their 15 minutes of fame on stage. There is nothing more going on than than the hypnotist selecting good improvisers/performers to have fun on stage.
What exactly can be done in that state, is it simply like being asleep while awake? What if he had told someone to strip naked? What about take this knife and stab the other person? I dunno... maybe I should have lied about the first part to get on stage to try it for myself ;p
If someone isn't in a relaxed state of focussed attention then I fail to see how the word 'hypnosis' can even remotely apply. Stripping off on stage is an old routine among stage hypnotists (usually involving just the men). The more extrovert might flash a bit more than they should, but most won't show any more than their boxer shorts, etc., because they are entirely aware of what they are doing. Suggesting to someone that they stab another person is just stupid (though I realise you're not saying any stage hypnotist has done this).
Can that state actually be used to plant lasting suggestions? I'm sure we've all heard about 'quitting smoking' through hypnotism and the such....
This is hypnotherapy - a very different thing from stage-hypnosis. If someone wants to stop smoking then you can help them construct in their minds the image of being a non-smoker and all the (good) reasons why they want to quit. New Scientist published something a while back (sadly, not online) that showed hypnosis to be the best way of quitting.

In a state like meditation or hypnosis there is activity in two interesting parts of the brain - the limbic system (emotion) and the frontal lobes (logical thinking/reasoning) that seem to help people focus on what they want to change.

Hypnosis is a bit more than counselling/psychotherapy "with your eyes shut" because we will aim to relax our subjects very deeply. This serves to lower stress hormones like cortisol and adrenaline and increase growth hormone, endorphins and serotonin. With over 10,000 abstracts for "hypnosis" available on PubMed (the vast majority of them positive) nobody could seriously deny it's positive uses in stress managment.

Hope that helps.
_
HypnoPsi
 
A widespread view amongst experimental psychologists who have done laboratory studies of "hypnosis" is that it is role playing.
The two current theories about hypnosis are the "socio-cognitive" model (sometimes called the "psycho-social" model) and the "state theory" which promotes ideas about "automatism" and "hypnotic somnambulism".

Now, we know that "nocturnal somnambulism" (sleepwalking) exists so the idea is worth considering (since sleepwalkers do make good subjects), but nobody has ever shown that the sleepwalking brain is in any way similar to the "hypnotised" brain or that sleepwalking behaviour (usuall a very muddled affair) is in anyway similar to "hypnotised" behaviour.

The term "role-playing" clearly applies to stage-hypnosis - but not to hypnotherapy. The simple reason being that one is audience participation in stage-routines and the other is contained within a "therapeutic relationship".
From what we have been shown in the media and from what the hypnotist tells us, we know that we can do what the hypnotist tells us to do, safely and without blame for our actions. To some extent, at least.
Eh??
Stage hypnosis should be carefully distinguished from what is called "clinical" hypnosis. In stage hypnosis, people who would walk around and cluck like a chicken in front of 100 people eagerly volunteer for the oportunity and then the most compliant (those who are told that their hands are glued together and demonstrate that they can't separate them) are told do do silly things.
Correct. Stage-hypnosis is just audience participation.
Clinical hypnosis does not work for permanently changing bad habits, such as smoking.
Totally wrong. Here's the real deal on hypnosis and smoking: http://mindsci-clinic.com/cessation_methods.htm

(The best way to quit for good is to combine methods, preferably hypnotherapy and NRT.)
Hypnosis generally doesn't improve memory and can distort eyewiness testimony.
There is nothing particular about hypnosis that encourages memory decay (or recall) but bad/good questioning skills can make a big difference.
_
HypnoPsi
 
Here's a couple paragraphs from a long article on hypnotism in Psychology Today. I happen to agree with this, probably because I learned hypnotism from the person quoted. He says it much better than I could.

T. X. Barber, a hypnosis elder statesman, says he's known "from the very beginning" that people can bring out their own inner capabilities by direct requests to think, feel, and experience in a suggested way, without any need for hypnotic induction. "In my first study for my Ph.D., over 35 years ago," says the author of Hypnosis: A Scientific Approach, "the control-group subjects were simply told very seriously to feel one extended arm becoming very heavy, that they were becoming exceedingly thirsty, that they couldn't unclasp their hands, and so forth. They responded in this amazing way that showed people have unexercised capabilities to experience things that are typically associated with the word 'hypnosis.' "

Further experiments led Barber to conclude that "the secret of hypnosis has several components. One is some people are superb subjects who are able to fantasize in a hallucinatory way and provide the drama and excitement. Another is that the majority of the rest can respond to suggestions far more than hypnotists have realized if the suggestions are given firmly--and without the complexities of calling it hypnosis or administering a hypnotic-induction procedure."

http://cms.psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-19920301-000033.html
 
Last edited:
Further experiments led Barber to conclude that "the secret of hypnosis has several components. One is some people are superb subjects who are able to fantasize in a hallucinatory way and provide the drama and excitement. Another is that the majority of the rest can respond to suggestions far more than hypnotists have realized if the suggestions are given firmly--and without the complexities of calling it hypnosis or administering a hypnotic-induction procedure."
I have my doubts about this. It's clear that psychologically we accept/reject suggestions all the time in social dialogue or when viewing commercials, but a hypnothrapy session is quite different. Since neural activity alters in hypnosis in the limbic system (emotion) and the frontal lobes (reasoning) it seems only logical to suggest that congition is altered also - however minor/major that may be. Add to this the "therapeutic relationship" which involves counselling an individual and finding out exactly why something like passing their driving test or stopping smoking is important to them and then providing hypnotic suggestions and I think you have something other than the whole "authoritarian" theory (which is really just the experimenter effect).

Physiologically, it is also true that you can just give someone a placebo without any lengthy induction and see quite remarkable results but I'm not convinced that placebos alone are anywhere as good as hypnotherapy. Hypnosis does, with patience/practice, help to reduce cortisol, adrenaline, etc., and increase growth hormone, seratonin, endorphins, etc.,.

This is kind of like an issue of validity and reliability. It's definately valid to point out the power of suggestion and the placebo effect but would you rely on it alone if you had something like hypertension or would you opt for real relaxation exercises and stress management?
_
HypnoPsi
 
Hypnotic "suggestability" has never been proven to be a real phenomenon within what seems to be little more than a pleasantly relaxed state of focussed attention and a better term might be "(psycho-social) sensitivity".

So while 'hypnotic suggestion' is a good (and accurate term) - it's just that, a 'suggestion' that can be accepted or rejected.

Is that acceptance done on a conscious level? Lets say it is Stage-Hypnosis and I become "hypnotised" but I simply do not want to act like a chicken... Could I just say, at that point "uh.. no" and sit down? Or even if they told me to "sit down".

Or does it only have to do with lines the individual has drawn as to their moral or limits upon what they have a strong aversion to not doing? Ie: Someone who strips naked in public every day and/or also a nudist might not care if told to do so, however, an average individual might not choose to go all the way.

Maybe I should try to get hypnotised one day to see. But I have a feeling I'd just be sitting there laughing which would probably be counter-productive. But maybe not, if in a setting with Me-Hypnotist and a video camera and I tried hard to listen to instructions ;p

My view is that a lot of confabulation occurs when someone who already believes in such things as alien abduction/past lives encounters a therapist who is open to such accounts.

Seems logical to me. I doubt you'd be able to past-life regress someone with lasting effects and belief to a known fictional person. But, again, I have little knowledge or experience with Hypnotism. ie: You were Spok on the Enterprise in a past life.

Well, I'm not a stage-hypnotist, but unless this routine was loaded with one-liners it's not really very good in my estimation.

It was just the 'introduction'. Two 'one-liners'. (Lemon and the phsycial hand/magnet thing)

So, he didn't actually have the audience clasp their hands together? Interesting.These things are known as convincers.

He did, Yes. Arms straight out infront of you, making fists in hands, and pressing fists together 'as hard as you can'. I didn't bother, didn't want the cramp lol.

My favourite is to have people close their eyes and hold out both arms visualising a helium baloon tied to one arm and a heavy bag of shopping tied to the other. Most people, upon opening their eyes will notice that their arms are at different degrees from their bodies.It's just a convincer about mind/body effects.

Would this be considered ideometer effect? I know you can do the same thing with a pendulum too. Hold it and imagine/visualize it rotating a certain way, but making every effort to not move your hand at all.

As for the black wall/red light thing... I've never even heard of it and, again, anyone can go into a relaxed state of focussed attention as verified by the multitude of self-hypnosis tapes available.

I tried searching for it, to no avail. I cannot recall for certain where I saw it. It's even possible it was a movie, but I really think it was like a National Geographic show, History/Discovery, etc, Tend to watch them a lot.

I remember the details of it though... In that, if you tell them something is happening and then you actually make it happen without them knowing they think they are imaginging it (even though their eyes are actually seeing it) and are then much more likely to be 'hypnotised'.

It's all audience participation and nothing more. Some people imagine that stage-hypnotists need confidants in the audience or that people are drunk (which can/does lower inhibitions) but that's completely unnecessary. Participants in stage shows are all usually twenty/thirty-somethings having their 15 minutes of fame on stage.

I had thought about it. And the ages of the ones I witnessed were probably half 20-30 and half 30-40.

It's hard to imagine though everyone doing it for '15 minutes of fame' especially when doing particularly stupid things. And what happens if during the middle of it they just laugh and sit down or something... .. That'd totally ruin the show. Perhaps that's why he has people sit down at various times, to encourage those remaining to play along better or you'll be sitting down too?

Just seems a risky business.... Especially if people want to 'be funny' and not listen to him after playing along for a while.

By the way, at the very end, he had told a person that everytime he says "RED" the person will become infurated and want to come on stage and punch him out. At the very end, he says RED loudly and angrily. The person comes up and when nearing him he says "Sleep" and points at them (previously established). .... Just wondering what would occur if he didn't say sleep? Get decked? lol.... or if it's just 'playing along' and people were fully aware and conscious of it, decided to hit him anyway? ;p

There is nothing more going on than than the hypnotist selecting good improvisers/performers to have fun on stage.If someone isn't in a relaxed state of focussed attention then I fail to see how the word 'hypnosis' can even remotely apply.

ALOT of the time of the stage performance is spent on relaxation and focusing. Around half the show time. (10-15mins or more)

Would the people afterwards just say they just wanted to do it? Or... maybe a better question, Wouldn't the people afterwards know they just wanted to do it?

Hypnotism in the past has always kinda bugged me - and the recent show bugged me more - and there isn't a lot of good credible resources out there to really find out 'what's what'. :/

Thanks for all the commentary, though!
 
Last edited:
I thought you couldn't be hypnotized unless you wanted to...
 
I thought you couldn't be hypnotized unless you wanted to...

The elementalist has been hypnotized for a long time. He was told to go to Jref and make no sense what so ever using really hard words he doesn't understand.
 
The real question

A widespread view amongst experimental psychologists who have done laboratory studies of "hypnosis" is that it is role playing. From what we have been shown in the media and from what the hypnotist tells us, we know that we can do what the hypnotist tells us to do, safely and without blame for our actions. To some extent, at least.
Stage hypnosis should be carefully distinguished from what is called "clinical" hypnosis. In stage hypnosis, people who would walk around and cluck like a chicken in front of 100 people eagerly volunteer for the oportunity and then the most compliant (those who are told that their hands are glued together and demonstrate that they can't separate them) are told do do silly things.
Clinical hypnosis does not work for permanently changing bad habits, such as smoking.
Hypnosis generally doesn't improve memory and can distort eyewiness testimony.
Like most folks I have been facinated at one time or another by hypnotism. At this point I am convinced that there really is no such thing as a hypnotic state. For me the really interesting question is why some people are inclined to play along with hypnotists and become "hypnotized". A couple of times at company events we have had hypnotists perform. The first time I went up on stage and, of course, could not be hypnotized. I was jealous of the people who could, supposely that they must have some faculty which I lacked.

The second time was with a much more accomplished performer and I have to say it was very convincing. A friend of mine participated and was told, in one instance, to suppose a balloon animal was really a vicious dog about to attack him - and that is how he responded - as though he were threatened by a vicious dog. I have asked him about it since then and he claims he was really hypnotized was convinced it was a dog on some level. Frankly I don't believe this.

Actually, I find it a little bit frightening that so many people seem inclined to "go along" and to, essentially, participate in a fraud, harmless though it may be. It makes me wonder what percentage of the population are inclined to go along with ANYTHING if circumstances reward or validate a behaviour. Me, I simply could not pretend that I couldn't raise my arm if in fact I knew I could. I suppose I am one of the spoilsport types. It seems to me we do not have enough spoilsports and far too many people willing to go along. I realize this sort of thing is just entertainment but I can help but feel that it has more sinister implications in terms of mass hysteria and the various examples of horrible herd behavior in human beings thoughout history.
 
I can't think in pictures so I find it hard to believe other people can. Why does people "go along" with this whole "visualising" business?
 
hahaha

switch your consciousness to the back of your head...dumb ass...=)...between temporal lobe and ocipital (sp)

here in non-antomical terms...

recall a memory...lean back with your hands on the back of your head...switch your consciousness to the back...and with confidence create an image...or try to see what you remeber seeing by describing it...as if you were talking to your brain...

YOU CAN CONVINCE YOURSELF!!!!

I can't visualize...yes you can!

Ah...I have been under a spell for a while...I will prove myself!!!!!
 

Back
Top Bottom