• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

How many continents are there?

I said this actually made no sense because from a physical standpoint they should just be one very large continent called Eurasia. I mean North and South America were not even joined until very recently in geologic time and presently are moving so they will separate again.

Wait, weren't they sliced in two about a hundred years ago?

Wikipedia turned out to be rather useless on this matter. It seems there is no concrete finite criteria for what is and isn't a continent.

It gets worse: They're also on a "planet", which is also not well-defined.
 
What's with the inordinate number of As? Asia, Africa, Australia, Antarctica, North and South America?
 
What's with the inordinate number of As? Asia, Africa, Australia, Antarctica, North and South America?

They were going to call it "Aurope", but they didn't want people to think it was populated solely by Geordies.
 
Ha! Last oympics I had this same argument with a foreigner. He said the five circles represent the five (habitable) continents.

I was taught there are seven and I stand by that.

North America
South America
Africa
Asia
Europe
Antarctica
Australia

That's what I was taught.

Oh, and Quebec. :p
 
Ha! Last oympics I had this same argument with a foreigner. He said the five circles represent the five (habitable) continents.

I was taught there are seven and I stand by that.

Sadly, the guy who created the Olympic ring symbol (Pierre De Coubertin) said that was the idea behind his creation. Good at art and design doesn't necessarily mean good at geography. :D

(ETA: At least, Amurcan geography -- which, as everyone knows, is the only correct one.)

From Wikipedia page:
Pierre De Coubertin said:
The Olympic flag ... has a white background, with five interlaced rings in the centre: blue, yellow, black, green and red ... This design is symbolic ; it represents the five inhabited continents of the world, united by Olympism, while the six colors are those that appear on all the national flags of the world at the present time. (1931)
 
Last edited:
Continents can not be defined by plate tectonics, since a given continent may be composed by more than one plate. In doubt? Check Eurasia.

Current artificial channels can not be used as criteria to separate continents for at least two reasons:
1. If there's a bridge or any other structure between bot sides, they are still linked.
2. There's still plenty of continental crust underneath the channel.

From geologic and geographic POVs, I would say we have four continents Africa-Eurasia, Americas, Australia and Antarctica. Separations between Europe and Asia and Asia and Africa, or between the Americas, IMHO, seems more like a cultural issue.
 
From a plate tectonics point of view, the concept of continents make about as much cogent sense as constellations do in the heavens. It's a useful generalization, but a difference without a distinction. Just look at the difference a few meters of sea level causes.

There's just one continent, Pangaea/Rhodinia/Gondwanaland; all the rest is just details.
 

Back
Top Bottom