FireGarden
Philosopher
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2002
- Messages
- 5,047
The thing I remember about Thatcher is when she was told that the gap between rich and poor was widening. She didn't deny it, she just said it was okay because everybody was better off -- and that's what counted. I remember her moving her hands up and down to show that both levels had increased. By how much, I don't recall.
I might not have agreed with her, but at least she was honest enough to express her actual viewpoint: the gap between rich and poor doesn't matter.
My impression is that Labour does think the gap matters. But they've not been able to close the gap.
After 13 years of Labour rule:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7003694.ece
So, Labour were unable to reverse the trend and the Tories are now "shocked, shocked I tell you!".
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...and-poor-growing-fast-under-blair-551139.html
From this, quoting Harriet Harman:
http://www.equalities.gov.uk/media/press_releases/harman_government_steps_up_ac.aspx
It's not actually clear that the aim is to close the gap between rich and poor -- rather than to give greater opportunity for individuals to make the transition from poor to rich.
I might not have agreed with her, but at least she was honest enough to express her actual viewpoint: the gap between rich and poor doesn't matter.
My impression is that Labour does think the gap matters. But they've not been able to close the gap.
After 13 years of Labour rule:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7003694.ece
Gap between rich and poor 'at its widest since the war'
[...] Theresa May, Tory equality spokeswoman, called the report “truly shocking”.
At the very least, it will make uncomfortable reading for Labour, which has spent heavily on programmes such as Sure Start and early years education to try to narrow the class divide.
[...] At best, Labour has managed only to slow a growing class divide dating back to the 1980s.
So, Labour were unable to reverse the trend and the Tories are now "shocked, shocked I tell you!".
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...and-poor-growing-fast-under-blair-551139.html
the report found that the rich and super rich have thrived under Tony Blair's premiership. Since 1990, the increase in the share of wealth held by the top ten per cent of the population has increased from 47 per cent to 54 per cent.
From this, quoting Harriet Harman:
http://www.equalities.gov.uk/media/press_releases/harman_government_steps_up_ac.aspx
We know that disadvantage can come from your gender or ethnicity; your sexual orientation or from disability; your age or your religion or belief or any combination of these. But overarching and interwoven with this is the persistent inequality of social class – your family background and where you were born.
[...] We have made progress over the last 13 years – especially in tackling poverty - and halted the rising growth of inequality that dates back to the 1980’s and which we still see the effects of today. But we will do more to increase social mobility and tackle the barriers that hold people back unfairly.
It's not actually clear that the aim is to close the gap between rich and poor -- rather than to give greater opportunity for individuals to make the transition from poor to rich.