Border Reiver
Philosopher
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2011
- Messages
- 6,726
They do however, fit the original definition of "outlaw" - one who is outside the law (and its protection)
If only the law allowed them that option, they would disappear overnight, one way or another.They do however, fit the original definition of "outlaw" - one who is outside the law (and its protection)
They do however, fit the original definition of "outlaw" - one who is outside the law (and its protection)
I know that "without prejudice" can be used in (actual, non-woo) common law to indicate that a particular exchange, be it verbal or written, can't be used as evidence in court, but I also know that these exchanges must be part of a genuine attempt to reach a settlement.
With regards to all of My Special Guy's correspondence which he has appended with "Without prejudice..." and the usual hocus pocus, as Freeloaders are wont to do... can I still present that to the court?
I know that "without prejudice" can be used in (actual, non-woo) common law to indicate that a particular exchange, be it verbal or written, can't be used as evidence in court, but I also know that these exchanges must be part of a genuine attempt to reach a settlement. To my mind, FMOTL woo does not constitute a genuine attempt to reach a settlement (other than my FMOTL asserting that he is totally being honest and genuine x infinity), and I should be able to present his correspondence.
...............the role I operate in at present has no formal legal training associated with it..............
If I could be so bold as to ask, What is your concern in this case. (sometimes I just need to know the players role........and without a program).
![]()
We've now received an updated fee schedule from our Freeloader.
His hourly rate has increased by 400%. Just fancy that!
So he is the freeloader, but it is YOU who desires performance from him without payment or recompense?
Isn't it you who expects action from him without payment, and does that not make you the freeloader?
His initial gripe is that we haven't accepted his "remittance" (essentially, the bills being sent back to us with the giro slip at the bottom signed in lieu of any genuine cash transaction)
So he is the freeloader, but it is YOU who desires performance from him without payment or recompense?
Isn't it you who expects action from him without payment, and does that not make you the freeloader?
I'd like to hear from anyone who has had success with this, too.
So he is the freeloader, but it is YOU who desires performance from him without payment or recompense?
Don't hold your breath on that one.
...and Robert Arthur Menard certainly isn't the one to be asking for answers or proof of anything.... because he has no proof and his answers are always based on untruths.
So he is the freeloader, but it is YOU who desires performance from him without payment or recompense?
Isn't it you who expects action from him without payment, and does that not make you the freeloader?
Did you even bother to read the OP?
Now you owe me for having to explain it to you.
![]()