• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

HAARP, again?!

Orphia Nay said:
Typical CTs. They latched on to Assange when he was flavour of the month and made out like Assange was into 9/11 Truth, etc. It blew up in their face when Assange outright disavowed da Truth.

I'm sure Snowden will not live up to their distorted expectations either.
Click to expand...

Yep, there's now a thread over at DIF absolutely livid that a fake news site has posted a fake story about Saddam Hussein planting bombs in WTC7, with the source allegedly being Ed Snowden.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=250611

As with the HAARP one, it is complete balderdash.
 
Why do "critical thinkers" fall for this BS story on a BS site, even some CTers don't buy this c**p!!

from the comments
This is a SATIRICAL news website. Take a look at some of their other stories. It is amazing to me how many people and even sites like aircrap.org are regurgitating this story without verifying it’s authenticity. It would be great if Snowden had really revealed some inside info about chemtrails, but don’t let your desire for vindication cloud your judgement.
Click to expand...
 
Orphia Nay said:
Thanks for the heads-up. I'd just sent that link to someone who believes in the moon nuke. I hope he doesn't see that there when he reads it.
Click to expand...

The article is currently protected so you have to be registered to edit it. Whoever is adding the 'Snowdon worked in reviving Project A119' material has not taken that step yet.

Their comments have to be read:

First time
Please do not remove this edit. Asking kindly. I have seen proof that Snowden has this information.
Click to expand...

Second time (on article talk page)
This is bigger than you think, and please stop this edit war.
Click to expand...

Third time
Just wait, and watch... the laptops will show it. Please stop this edit war. Thank you.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
bobwtfomg said:
Why do "critical thinkers" fall for this BS story on a BS site, even some CTers don't buy this c**p!!
Click to expand...

Captain Obvious:
Because most selfdeclared "critical thinkers" actually have less working braincells than a 2011 Halloween pumpkin, and will believe anything if it fits their beliefs (even if it contradicting itself)

Of course there are also the Führers of the Conspiracy crowd, who know that is BS, but promote it (while leaving out the source) anyway.
 
I guess we don't have to worry about HAARP anymore.

http://www.arrl.org/news/haarp-facility-shuts-down

The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) — a subject of fascination for many hams and the target of conspiracy theorists and anti-government activists — has closed down. HAARP’s program manager, Dr James Keeney at Kirtland Air Force Base in New Mexico, told ARRL that the sprawling 35-acre ionospheric research facility in remote Gakona, Alaska, has been shuttered since early May.
Click to expand...
 
That just means they finished building Ultra HAARP. Five times bigger with a hundred times the power. It can melt the surface of Venus and will definitely explode your mind!
 
World domination foiled by that pesky EPA. :D

The proximate cause of HAARP’s early May shutdown was less fiscal than environmental, Keeney said. As he explained it, the diesel generators on site no longer pass Clean Air Act muster. Repairing them to meet EPA standards will run $800,000.
Click to expand...
 
UTLonghorn said:
It appears to be an unfunny version of The Onion. Unsurprisingly, the CTists commenting on the articles are completely oblivious to this.
Click to expand...
Not a surprise; heck I've seen the more clueless of them use The Onion as a source at least twice! :jaw-dropp (not counting suspected trollery)
 
You've got to wonder, with a super-weapon like HAARP in our arsenal, which can not only cause earthquakes and hurricanes, but can kill people or render them insane at will, why exactly did we use conventional military forces in Iraq and Afghanistan? Couldn't we have accomplished our goals a lot more effectively without killing and wounding military personnel?
 
CORed said:
You've got to wonder, with a super-weapon like HAARP in our arsenal, which can not only cause earthquakes and hurricanes, but can kill people or render them insane at will, why exactly did we use conventional military forces in Iraq and Afghanistan? Couldn't we have accomplished our goals a lot more effectively without killing and wounding military personnel?
Click to expand...
If we did that everyone we would know we could do this and do have this capability.

What fun would that be? ;)
 
CORed said:
You've got to wonder, with a super-weapon like HAARP in our arsenal, which can not only cause earthquakes and hurricanes, but can kill people or render them insane at will, why exactly did we use conventional military forces in Iraq and Afghanistan? Couldn't we have accomplished our goals a lot more effectively without killing and wounding military personnel?
Click to expand...

HAARP only works on those who don't believe it exists. That's why all the CTers screaming about HAARP are safe from it. It has something to do with quantum thingimajigs and neural whatchamacallits. Plus I don't think HAARP can penetrate the average American basement.
 
CORed said:
You've got to wonder, with a super-weapon like HAARP in our arsenal, which can not only cause earthquakes and hurricanes, but can kill people or render them insane at will, why exactly did we use conventional military forces in Iraq and Afghanistan? Couldn't we have accomplished our goals a lot more effectively without killing and wounding military personnel?
Click to expand...

Being there is its own goal - all the better to feed the MIC!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom