Gravy Cleanses Silverstein Quote

Gravy You dishonest jerk! :boggled:

Please correct your paper and apologize to anyone who may have been mislead.

Snicker...lol!
 
There must be a hundred places you can listen to the quote for yourselves. I have corrected at least a dozen websites on this already.
Click to expand...

Glad to see you were productive during your suspension! That Wiki thing, is still a thorn in your pride, huh?
 
Ahh, but you see from the "Big Bad Gubmint Did it" pov, the "then" implies that after he said "pull the building down with Controlled Demolition", we "then" watched the building (which I just ordered to be demolished) Collapse.

Now you see the relivance (from their pov).

lol

TAM
 
Reading on, I see Gravy gets tremendous mileage out of his deceptive misquote, even going so far as to hand the misquote to a truth activist and have him read it.

Gravy, perhaps next time you can get the quote right, then have people read it. Just a thought.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Reading on, I see Gravy gets tremendous mileage out of his deceptive misquote, even going so far as to hand the misquote to a truth activist and have him read it.

Gravy, perhaps next time you can get the quote right, then have people read it. Just a thought.
Click to expand...
You made a number of unsubstantiated claims in here.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=65353&page=3

A number of people called you out and asked you to support your claims with evidence. But instead of answering them you ran away and created this thread.

You are are sad, narcissistic, childish, terrorist supporting troll. How do you live with yourself?
 
DavidJames said:
You made a number of unsubstantiated claims in here.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=65353&page=3

A number of people called you out and asked you to support your claims with evidence. But instead of answering them you ran away and created this thread.
Click to expand...

The nature of the beast. Play out unsubstantiated claims in a thread until the either the evidence against it begins to overwhelm, or it is exposed as the simple conjecture it is, then change the subject.

The only way to truly debate the 'truthers' is to keep them on one subject. Their tactic is to throw as much 'evidence' in your direction as they can as fast as they can, regardless if it is valid or not, changing the subject as needed, until you don't know where to begin to debunk.

The technique must be in the CT handbook; they all use it.
 
In this thread, TruthSeeker1234 has misstated that a camera contained editing software.

thread title:
Val McClatchey's camera identified, contained editing software
Click to expand...
The correct statement must be that the camera is sold with an accompanying CD that contains the software.

This is no minor point, for the word "contained" shows locational positioning of the software inside the camera itself.

TruthSeeker1234, please correct your thread and blog, and apologize to anyone who may have been misled.


I state that I was misled by the thread title, and so you can start your apologies with me.




Or perhaps I'm willfully misunderstanding the gist of your post and am trying to obfuscate the issue, while at the same time appearing pretentious and arrogant.
 
lylfyl said:
In this thread, TruthSeeker1234 has misstated that a camera contained editing software.

thread title:

The correct statement must be that the camera is sold with an accompanying CD that contains the software.

This is no minor point, for the word "contained" shows locational positioning of the software inside the camera itself.

TruthSeeker1234, please correct your thread and blog, and apologize to anyone who may have been misled.


I state that I was misled by the thread title, and so you can start your apologies with me.




Or perhaps I'm willfully misunderstanding the gist of your post and am trying to obfuscate the issue, while at the same time appearing pretentious and arrogant.
Click to expand...
the thread and blog is from Killtown, not TS1234

easy mistake though, they might as well be the same person, lol
 
Okay, then. There's a "then". It still works.

"I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire..."

Well, then, it would have been dangerously futile to continue to fight it, by gum.


"...and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.'"

Then the team inside can be pulled out to to safety.


"And they..."

They. Tell your friends that you concede that Silverstein said "they", not "I".


"...made that decision to pull and then ..."

...and then the guys we pulled out were able to stand with us when...


"...we watched the building collapse."

...since we were then together, and none of the "we" was inside the building at that later time.


[snaps fingers] Easy.
 
Dammit. :boxedin: I even had to open that thread to cut and paste.

Now I have to make another one.

lylfyl, you have claimed that Truthseeker1234 has posted a vile and underhanded thread.

In fact. It was killtown that posted it.

I apologize to Truthseeker and everyone that I misled.


[Back to lurking for you. Go play in the Humor section or something. ]
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
In his new WTC7 paper, Gravy has misquoted Larry Silverstein.



The correct quote must include the word "then", as follows:



This is no minor point, for the word "then" shows causal connection between what is said before, and what is said after.

Gravy, please correct your paper and apologize to anyone who may have been mislead.
Click to expand...


You find a single source showing that "pull" is an industry term for blowing up a building yet?
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Reading on, I see Gravy gets tremendous mileage out of his deceptive misquote, even going so far as to hand the misquote to a truth activist and have him read it.

Gravy, perhaps next time you can get the quote right, then have people read it. Just a thought.
Click to expand...

You, a bald-faced liar, have the nerve to quibble about the word "then"?

My God, it must suck to be you.
 
Stellafane said:
You, a bald-faced liar, have the nerve to quibble about the word "then"?
Click to expand...

So he read the whole thing and this was the biggest error he could find?

They must be running out of straws in la-la-land.
 
somebody confused
In this thread, TruthSeeker1234 has misstated that a camera contained editing software.

thread title:
Quote:
Val McClatchey's camera identified, contained editing software
The correct statement must be that the camera is sold with an accompanying CD that contains the software.

This is no minor point, for the word "contained" shows locational positioning of the software inside the camera itself.

TruthSeeker1234, please correct your thread and blog, and apologize to anyone who may have been misled.


I state that I was misled by the thread title, and so you can start your apologies with me.

Or perhaps I'm willfully misunderstanding the gist of your post and am trying to obfuscate the issue, while at the same time appearing pretentious and arrogant.
Click to expand...

I think that's about Killtown, not me.
 
T.A.M. said:
Ahh, but you see from the "Big Bad Gubmint Did it" pov, the "then" implies that after he said "pull the building down with Controlled Demolition", we "then" watched the building (which I just ordered to be demolished) Collapse.

Now you see the relivance (from their pov).

lol

TAM
Click to expand...

Yeah, he went and ordered the demolition, and then the damn thing went and collapsed all on its own! Total waste of resources, dontcha know, complete c*ck up. The mice were furious....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom