• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ghost in the Backseat

300px-BramallLaneFamStand.jpg


bramall-lane-sheffield-united-fc-kop-stand-1418468013.jpg


I first started noticing ghosts in a football ground in the UK roughly once a fortnight, sometimes midweek, and not for a couple of months in the Summer, a few years back in my home town. Imagine my surprise when I started visiting other football grounds and found the same phenomenon.

If a person is in one photo of a location, and then not in it in a photo taken some time later, the only explanation is ghosts.
 
Light, shadows and hair blowing in the wind, I think. Not a boy.

EDIT: On closer look, I'm not sure. I'm sure it's not a ghost, but that is about it. It's probably a juvy bigfoot.
 
Last edited:
My pareidolia-fu is not strong on this one. The 'mouth' is wrong, and the 'hair line' has strange shadows.
Could it be a pageant dress, hanging from the backseat, swinging?
 
I am actually a little surprised some people don't make a face from it. Next to the woman's ear is what looks to me like a very defined mouth. The only thing that makes me doubt it is what looks like silly striped hair.

What I'm still missing is why, if we assume it's a boy, that means it's a ghost and not an actual boy?
 
To me, it's quite obviously a kid in the back seat peeking around the girl's shoulder. They are claiming that the boy wasn't in the car at the time the picture was taken. So there are two possibilities:

1) there was no kid, which means: there was something else in the backseat that shifted into the picture and created a weird pareidolia effect, the boy's image was edited into it or there's a such thing as ghosts.

or

2)there was a kid in the car at the time and they either forgot that detail or are lying to sell a story. I can see looking at this picture later and saying, "Hah, that looks creepy the way little Buddy is in the picture . . . let's tell everyone it's a ghost!"

I'll bet you? The girl knows her mom is a paranormal enthusiast so she told her mom this was a picture taken at a time when that other kid wasn't in the car but it was actually taken on a day when the kid was in the car. Haha! Fooled mom!
 
xjx388 said:
2)there was a kid in the car at the time and they either forgot that detail or are lying to sell a story. I can see looking at this picture later and saying, "Hah, that looks creepy the way little Buddy is in the picture . . . let's tell everyone it's a ghost!"
Click to expand...

"Porky Pies" is my default answer to crap like this. Someone's been spinning yarn.
 
Something doesn't sit quite right with me about the boy's mouth and chin. But I can't put my finger on anything specific. It just doesn't look right.
 
Was that a pun?
The chin supposedly looks strange because his finger is in front of it
 
Oh, I see. It looks like his fingers are poking out from the tip of a sleeve and being held in front of his face. That makes sense now.
 
1. It's not a ghost because there are no ghosts.

2. If ghosts were a real thing, this would still not be one. The source is questionable at best. Plus, sunlight only reflects off solid objects, or solid-enough objects, so a phantasm would have a lot of problems in direct sunlight.
 
SOdhner said:
It's a kid, sitting in the back seat. Note that he's in both pictures, you can see a little bit of his shoulder in the one. So she takes a picture, then he leans over and she takes another.

Then someone realizes that the way her hair obscures his face looks mildly creepy, so they make up a story about a ghost.

SOLVED!
Click to expand...


Yep. Person or not, it is definitely in both photos. I'd say person.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom