• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Freefall?

Dooooooo over!!

starting over are you?

:dl:


William Rea said:
Please return to the OP and read it again.

The 9/11 CTers are always going on about how the WTC collapsed "faster than freefall". Have any of them ever proven this? That is, told us the speed of a object free-falling through the air, and then told us the precise speed of fall of the WTC?

I know it's difficult coming in on the back end of a thread when you haven't read the whole thing so I won't make a big thing of this.
Click to expand...
 
William Rea said:
Please return to the OP and read it again.

The 9/11 CTers are always going on about how the WTC collapsed "faster than freefall". Have any of them ever proven this? That is, told us the speed of a object free-falling through the air, and then told us the precise speed of fall of the WTC?

I know it's difficult coming in on the back end of a thread when you haven't read the whole thing so I won't make a big thing of this.
Click to expand...
Stop with the red herring. OP asked if any CFist had ever proven faster that freefall. You argued none had made that claim. It has not been showed that they have made that claim. You then try to shift the burden of proof around as if the OP were claiming that the CFists had proven it. Just stop. You've been proven wrong. Accept it and move on.
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
Stop with the red herring. OP asked if any CFist had ever proven faster that freefall. You argued none had made that claim. It has not been showed that they have made that claim. You then try to shift the burden of proof around as if the OP were claiming that the CFists had proven it. Just stop. You've been proven wrong. Accept it and move on.
Click to expand...

I did not claim that no CTer had ever claimed "faster than freefall", not on one occaision did I say that. That is absolute BS.

I did not once say that any CTer had proved "faster than freefall". Why would I claim they had proved something that I do not even believe happened. Your post is complete and utter BS.

For heaven's sake show some intellectual honesty won't you.

I know I said the previous was my last post but your dishonesty could not go without response, you have just told two outright lies.
 
William Rea said:
I did not claim that no CTer had ever claimed "faster than freefall", not on one occaision did I say that. That is absolute BS.
Click to expand...
Did you, or did you not, ask for specific names of CFists that claimed faster than freefall?

William Rea said:
I did not once say that any CTer had proved "faster than freefall". Why would I claim they had proved something that I do not even believe happened. Your post is complete and utter BS.
Click to expand...
I didn't say you did, I said you were trying to make it appear as though the OP claimed that.

William Rea said:
For heaven's sake show some intellectual honesty won't you.
Click to expand...
You wouldn't recognize intellectual honesty if it bit you on the ass.

William Rea said:
I know I said the previous was my last post but your dishonesty could not go without response, you have just told two outright lies.
Click to expand...
No, you just have reading comprehension problems.
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
Did you, or did you not, ask for specific names of CFists that claimed faster than freefall?
I didn't say you did, I said you were trying to make it appear as though the OP claimed that.
You wouldn't recognize intellectual honesty if it bit you on the ass.
No, you just have reading comprehension problems.
Click to expand...

This is going nowhere and I suspect that you are trying nothing more than to get the rise out of me by lying about my argument and creating a strawman.

I don't care what further lies you add, this is my final post. I have proven my case and discredited the OP assertions. I guess we'll have to live with it as best we can.
 
William Rea said:
This is going nowhere and I suspect that you are trying nothing more than to get the rise out of me by lying about my argument and creating a strawman.

I don't care what further lies you add, this is my final post. I have proven my case and discredited the OP assertions. I guess we'll have to live with it as best we can.
Click to expand...
The only assertion made in the OP was "The 9/11 CTers are always going on about how the WTC collapsed "faster than freefall"." Your attempt at refuting that assertion was countered. That you now choose to ignore those counters and pretend they did not occur does not change reality, nor the record that this thread provides.
 
William Rea said:
This is going nowhere and I suspect that you are trying nothing more than to get the rise out of me by lying about my argument and creating a strawman.

I don't care what further lies you add, this is my final post. I have proven my case and discredited the OP assertions. I guess we'll have to live with it as best we can.
Click to expand...

:dl:

Uhh.. No you haven't! The "faster than freefall" links are still in this thread. Unless you can make them disappear you have lost.
 
Well, William finally answered my question "Is intellectual sloth really a virtue where you live?"

How dare we confine ourselves to the orthodoxy of facts! The noive!
 
Gravy said:
Well, William finally answered my question "Is intellectual sloth really a virtue where you live?"

How dare we confine ourselves to the orthodoxy of facts! The noive!
Click to expand...


Facts!! We don't need no stinking facts!!

(sounds of gunfire)

Another CTer bites the dust.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom