Pyschic now? Best hurry up and claim that 1 million dollar prize.Doubtful.
Doubtful.
Which he never said:
"The last time I looked at the twin towers on 9/11 . Before 9/11 the glass was stationary but glass doesn't lose it ability to reflect light due to movement. Nothing does." -Firecoins.
And I never claimed it didn't reflect. I said when was the last time he saw it.
Because I called you on something? Awwww.I'm afraid you fellows have left me no choice. I have been forced to put realitybites and kookbreaker on ignore. I had to do this as I already have too many children to deal with. This may be reviewed in future if I see them behave.
Why do the 9/11 kooks always make claims like this?
Because what they're really saying is, "If I gave you real evidence you wouldn't believe it."
I'm afraid you fellows have left me no choice. I have been forced to put realitybites and kookbreaker on ignore. I had to do this as I already have too many children to deal with. This may be reviewed in future if I see them behave.
That means it's okay for their statements of fact to be wrong? That excuses them from fact-checking? I counted 115 erroneous statements resulting in 81 errors of fact in LC2. Since then I've found more. I'm not talking about matters of opinion, Docker, but matters of fact. This is a movie that I've personally heard its creators describe as "100% true."Because it specifically requests that the viewer does not take it as fact and do their own research.
Possibly someone breaking a window because they were choking on smoke? Or getting ready to jump?Why was it falling?
Because I called you on something? Awwww.
I didn't even do that, I just called him out on the things he said and he had a hissyfit.
But do let us know how you can see us behave when you can't see us post.
You just know he's clicking the 'view post' button.
Hi Docker! Are you happy with the responses you got to your little tantrum?
Because I called you on something? Awwww.
But do let us know how you can see us behave when you can't see us post.
Psychic powers GO!
Firecoins edited his post you dimwit. Only the first line was in when I saw it
That means it's okay for their statements of fact to be wrong? That excuses them from fact-checking? I counted 115 erroneous statements resulting in 81 errors of fact in LC2. Since then I've found more. I'm not talking about matters of opinion, Docker, but matters of fact. This is a movie that I've personally heard its creators describe as "100% true."
And after they've had a chance to correct those errors?
"We know there are errors in the documentary, and we’ve actually left them in there so that people discredit us and do the research for themselves." – Korey Rowe http://tinyurl.com/qruh7
From the Loose Change DVD packaging and advertising:
"What you will see inside will prove without a shadow of doubt that everything you know about 9/11 is a complete fabrication."
Docker, please do not support such complete horsecrap. These creeps don't give a damn about the truth.
You get one guess before the laughing dog comes out again. Just so you know, the laughing dog is reserved for special occasions. Please think hard, and be honest.Why was it falling?
Not true. There's no edit mark which shows up if the post has modified after being viewed.
You lied. Again.
You get one guess before the laughing dog comes out again. Just so you know, the laughing dog is reserved for special occasions. Please think hard, and be honest.
I called you on the BBC bias thing. Tell ya' what. You Google "BBC bias" and show me what page the article I linked to is on.I will suspend ignore at the end of your probationary period and guage any improvement in your behavour.
What did you call me? Your on ignore because you google every statement I make. I think it's wise to break the stalker/victim relationship early.
In that case they will have completely failed in their mission to get people to not take their word and do their own research. That's where I come in.They will release final cut and another 30million will believe every word.