• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Feb 26, 1993

JHarrow said:
But they weren't.
Click to expand...
then you are defender of murderers.


You have taped evidence that the FBI were involved, yet you still deny.
Click to expand...

post those tapes. please make sure they provide the exact date and time of when the bombing was going to take place, and of course those involved.
 
Last edited:
JHarrow said:
Keep defending those murderers.
Click to expand...

So if we're "defenders of murderers" because we deny the veracity of evidence, what is someone like you who does nothing more with evidence than use it as fodder for an Internet message board debate while the murderers go free?

I think the word you're looking for is "accomplice".
 
JHarrow said:
Very suspicious. FBI involvement.
Click to expand...

Those are sentence fragments. Improve your grammar.

JHarrow said:
In the tape recordings. You fail.
Click to expand...

These are more sentence fragments. Come on, even primary school kids can do better than that.

JHarrow said:
But they weren't.
Click to expand...

Look, if you aren't even going to try to form full sentences, then should we all take you seriously after your conduct in another thread bashing someone else about their writing skills? Doctor, heal thyself.

As for the tapes, if you're willing to share them with us-- since we're all assuming you've heard this irrefutable evidence and are not simply relying on hearsay-- then by all means do so. Otherwise, the only "proof" we have is that the Blind Sheik is claiming he should have been stopped.
 
I guess the idea of a crackpot faking a tape...pretty damn easy to do...has never entered the mind of JHarrow.
I cringe at the label of "Critical Thinker" being applied to JHarrow. But then I never liked the "cool name granted just because you make a certain number of posts" feature anyway.
 
Please do not personalise the discussion any further - focus on the arguments rather than the members.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
 
JHarrow said:
But they weren't. You have taped evidence that the FBI were involved, yet you still deny.
Click to expand...
Irony much?

Post the evidence that convinced you that the FBI was in on this attack.

And then compare it to the wealth of evidence linking Al-Queda to 9-11.

Ask yourself which is the stronger case, and examine your beliefs.
 
Last edited:
Terrorists bought 3 tanks of compressed hydrogen to enhance bomb at AGL Welding
Supply on Rt 46, Clifton NJ - right down street from me. Know someone who worked
there - everyone got questioned by FBI as to what they saw. Testified at trials later.

Another friend worked at Allied Signal In Morristown in legal department - several days
later FBI showed up to "perp walk" Nidal Ayyad, one of the bomb builders out.

Your paranoid fantasies don't seem to fly in NJ .
 
Feb 26th, 1993, was my 14th half-birthday, on which I turned 13 and a half. I was unaware that this sad event happened on that day.
 
The explosives were provided by the FBI. One of the terrorists involved was an FBI informant
 
timhau said:
Not to play the one-up game, but I was born on April 19th. Turned 27 the day the Waco Siege ended, and 29 on the day of the Oklahoma City Bombing.
Click to expand...


I turned -42 the day the USSR invaded Poland.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom