Mike!
Official Ponylandistanian National Treasure. Re
From Truth social, "Trump: Charlie Kirk is dead."
Yeah, but how much can he bench press?Frankly, I was very impressed with Zohran Mamdani's campaign...he went, talked to people, sat with them, walked the neighborhoods and even that treasure hunt through NY was a great idea.
Only those who are afraid to die fear what may come.BTW several sources now reporting Kirk is Dead.
No tears for Kirk who was a racist and a bigot, but fear what this might lead too.
As I said in the other thread: Sow the wind, reap the whirlwind. I'm sure he expected the flames he was stoking wouldn't burn him, or something.From Truth social, "Trump: Charlie Kirk is dead."
It doesn't sound any more or less silly than it did before this.My predictions of CIvil War in the US as a strong possibility don't sound as silly now, do they?
You think Charlie Kirk is that influential of a figure that his death will spark a civil war?My predictions of CIvil War in the US as a strong possibility don't sound as silly now, do they?
Anything can spark a civil war if enough people really want one...You think Charlie Kirk is that influential of a figure that his death will spark a civil war?
Let's see, is it Tuesday? Is it sunny in the state of Arizona? Did a groundhog leave its den and see its own shadow? Either condition probably portends a civil war if you ask Dubalb.You think Charlie Kirk is that influential of a figure that his death will spark a civil war?
I mean, you'll be right someday. But it's kinda like predicting an earthquake on the west coast.My predictions of CIvil War in the US as a strong possibility don't sound as silly now, do they?
If it isn't civil it'll get moved to AAH.Anything can spark a civil war if enough people really want one...
Sorry, but Biden should not have run for reelection. His ego got the better of him It was a disasterous mistake.But yes, Biden's decline was really an issue. He really should've dropped out and given the reins to someone younger.
...Oh, wait.
It was not a civil war, of course, but the assination of an archduke in 1914 set off World War ONe.Anything can spark a civil war if enough people really want one...
I was predcting it since Trump's first election.,,and got a of heat for it.I mean, you'll be right someday. But it's kinda like predicting an earthquake on the west coast.
My prediction is you will predict civil war every day until the heat death of the universe.My predictions of CIvil War in the US as a strong possibility don't sound as silly now, do they?
Yes, a little less than 50% of voters decided to vote for Trump, and a little less than that decided to vote for Harris. And an awful lot of people decided not to vote. All of them for different reasons, and to be a pussy grabber or not be a pussy grabber, that's not the one and only question even though it may be the one and only question for you.And they decided to back Trump? You think that argument even holds?
No, it was not the only option. What do you think an election is? Sophie's choice?It was the only option. A rapist and a non rapist.
Even the Cheneys is good! As if that was question the Cheneys asked themselves: Which one of them doesn't grab pussies? The choice is clear! We'll vote for Harris, and her stance on other stuff has nothing whatsoever to do with it.Exactly. And one so clear that even the Cheney's got it right.
Why do all of you guys pretend that there's no other option than voting for either Trump or Harris?Which is what, precisely?
At the last USA presidential election there was the choice of 2 candidates who could become president, one was a known rapist, one was not a rapist. There was of course the third options of not voting at all, so yes I was wrong to say there was only the choice of the non rapist or the rapist, you could decide not to vote for either.Yes, a little less than 50% of voters decided to vote for Trump, and a little less than that decided to vote for Harris. And an awful lot of people decided not to vote. All of them for different reasons, and to be a pussy grabber or not be a pussy grabber, that's not the one and only question even though it may be the one and only question for you.
No, it was not the only option. What do you think an election is? Sophie's choice?
Even the Cheneys is good! As if that was question the Cheneys asked themselves: Which one of them doesn't grab pussies? The choice is clear! We'll vote for Harris, and her stance on other stuff has nothing whatsoever to do with it.
Why do all of you guys pretend that there's no other option than voting for either Trump or Harris?
There are more options than these, but I think these are pretty obvious:
Trump.
Harris.
Stein.
Blank.
Not voting.
Emigrating.
Trying to understand what a presidential election in a representative democracy actually is instead of accepting the choice that the election of one of those representatives presents you with. And acting accordingly. That's the option I choose (in another country with other candidates), but it's not a popular one, obviously.
As voters, (some of) you guys participated in this charade called representative democracy and thus handed over power to Donald Trump whether you voted for him or not.
See pages 10 and 11 of the Santos thread. The delusion of voters is explained in detail there. And there are plenty of examples of those delusions, too. That the thread was about Santos and not Trump doesn't really matter. The mistake made by voters is basically the same.