Sir Robin Goodfellow
Master Poster
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2007
- Messages
- 2,804
And suddenly, a rather innocuous little thread ballooned to twenty pages.
That's what I am talking about. I think it would be unsettling for some people watching the execution to see a struggling, screaming person begging for their life snuffed out before them. In cases of lethal injection, it seems it would make it even more problematic considering the trouble a thrashing victim would pose to the person trying to inject the needle.
"Cruel and unusual punishment" isn't the problem. Granted, it's been used in the past in connection with arguments against capital punishment (at least regarding particular methods), but the bigger problem is contained within the 5th amendment:
It's unfortunately virtually impossible not to read that without realizing that capital punishment is constitutional.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/09/21/ap/business/main20109250.shtmlWhite supremacist gang member Lawrence Russell Brewer was executed Wednesday evening for the infamous dragging death slaying of James Byrd Jr., a black man from East Texas.
Byrd, 49, was chained to the back of a pickup truck and pulled whip-like to his death along a bumpy asphalt road in one of the most grisly hate crime murders in recent Texas history.
Brewer, 44, was asked if he had any final words, to which he replied: "No. I have no final statement."
He glanced at his parents watching through a nearby window, took several deep breaths and closed his eyes. A single tear hung on the edge of his right eye as he was pronounced dead at 6:21 p.m., 10 minutes after the lethal drugs began flowing into his arms, both covered with intricate black tattoos.
In documentaries I have seen, the execution chamber is hidden behind a closed curtain.
The prisoner is escorted and/or forced onto a gurnee, kicking and screaming all he wants. Then, he is strapped down tight so he can't move. Then and only then is the curtain opened and the witnesses can see. They might see someone straining against the restraining belts, and they might see a mouth moving, but they can't hear because it has been soundproofed.
I believe that they also receive a heavy dose of tranquilizers before they ever leave the holding cell, but I don't know if that's universal in all states, and I do not know if it is optional in some or all states. I know that in some cases there is at least one mandatory injection before they ever enter the execution chamber.
They'd probably kill him, then take him to be executed.
AFAIK, at the time of World War I it was customary in all Western countries to blindfold the condemned, so he did not actually face his executioners. And to tie his hands so he could not pull the blindfold at the last moment (not the only reason, of course).If I had a choice, I'd choose the old-time, World War One era firing squad where you get to stand and face your executioners. Not many places do that anymore.
Yes they would. There are procedures for this event.This thread got me thinking: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=124546&page=2
What if an innocent person, after exhausting his appeals, simply refused to cooperate with the execution? What if he put up a fight? Screamed? Would they force him into the execution chamber while screaming and fighting for his life?
Would it be tasteless to ask posters how long they think it will be before the death penalty is abolished in the USA?
Rolfe.
This thread got me thinking: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=124546&page=2
What if an innocent person, after exhausting his appeals, simply refused to cooperate with the execution? What if he put up a fight? Screamed? Would they force him into the execution chamber while screaming and fighting for his life?
I'm equally glad I don't live in a country that feels the need to let mass murderers of 270 innocent victims walk free. We execute them.
So, I kind of like our constitution.
More on topic, I wonder how al-Megrahi would have reacted on his walk to the electric chair? (Pretending, of course, that he was innocent)
I won't.
Dragging someone to death over three miles and more of road is sorta what we have the death penalty for, Wildcat.
Sure glad he didn't do this in some pussy state that does not have the death penalty.
He also claimed innocence (IIRC, he was there, but denied killing Byrd). Yet, where were the crowds protesting for him? Perhaps because he is white?
No, because he was scum.
Michael
I'm quite happy with the knowledge that, unless I move to a country with a dumber, crappier justice system, I will never be killed by my own government for no pragmatic reason (note that I don't consider "quenching the impotent bloodlust of emotionalist pussies" to be a pragmatic reason).