The problem is that justintime is erroniously comparing human invasions of other countries to migration of species into new environments. The comparison fails for numerous reasons, which the subsequent discussion of invasive species highlights. justintime's rant also has very clear racist undertones, because I guess calling all scientists frauds and saying we should all (or actually, more than all of us) should be thrown in jail wasn't provocative enough.
Furthermore, some people on this message board seem to think that one must quote the entire post to demonstrate context, and that doing so is sufficient to demonstrate understanding of both the post and the context. This is nonsense. I've seen numerous posters quote long posts and not even read them--obviously not, because the questions they answer are answered in the post they quote. There is no discussion style where word-for-word repitition of someone else's statements is required; it bogs down the conversation, makes the posts unnecessarily long, does nothing to demonstrate comprehension, interferes with comprehensibility...I could go on, but you get the point.
It was sufficient, for the points being made, to demonstrate that justintime was discussing human invasions. Quoting the full post was unnecessary for that. Once that point was established, that point could be fully addressed, without quoting the rest of hte statement.
.
