Irrelevant anyway, as his prognosis was not used by the Scottish prison health board. We know who made the case for an estimated three months. Throw out your red herrings, they stink.
That odor you're smelling is Scottish haddock falling apart.
'... now doctors who were treating the 58-year-old Libyan have said they were not asked for their opinion about his life expectancy and were surprised to hear the convicted mass murderer was being sent home."
The revelations have led to fresh calls for al-Megrahi’s full medical records to be released amid allegations that the Scottish Government has been guilty of a “saga of contradictions, confusion and broken promises”.
"But it has now emerged that in making his assessment Dr Andrew Fraser – the head of health care for the Scottish Prison Service, who is not a cancer specialist, had no direct contact with the medical experts treating the convicted terrorist.
Relying on medical notes Dr Fraser concluded that the Libyan had less than three months to live – the maximum life expectancy allowed for him to be released on compassionate grounds.
But Dr Zac Latif, a consultant urologist at the Royal Alexandra Hospital in Paisley, has now confirmed he never met or spoke to Dr Fraser and had no idea how he had concluded al-Megrahi only had three months to live."
Still alive, isn't he.
Suckers!
Fail- It was still nothing to do with Sikora. I suggest you do some research on this. Rolfe can help you.
I think you'd have to demonstrate that he made a stupid decision. Let me know when you get around to that.
I don't think it's been demonstrated that it was bungled.
Cicero, medical science is not mathematic. Prediction don't come 100% out. There are TONS of people out there which were told they would live a few month only, to die years afterward. There are actually people which die earlier too.
*ALL* you can say as a fact , is that he lived longer than predicted. You haven't proved that the diagnostic of lethality of his cancer was wrong.
Secondly, having followed the process , the glaring problem with it for a long time, I can shake heads when I see the USian yelling for blood.
This wasn't just any diagnosis on just any patient. This was a diagnosis that had to meet the criteria for the Scottish Compassionate Release Process for a mass murderer, which says, "expectancy of less than three months may be considered an appropriate period."
Next time Scotland wants to impress the world with its enormous capacity for compassion could they make sure that:
1) The mass murderer they select for release only killed Scots.
2) The three months life expectancy wasn't pulled out of Dr. Fraser's posterior,
3) And that the authorities actually check out the qualifications of the medical personnel being relied upon for their advice.
This wasn't just any diagnosis on just any patient. This was a diagnosis that had to meet the criteria for the Scottish Compassionate Release Process for a mass murderer, which says, "expectancy of less than three months may be considered an appropriate period."
If the point is that Megrahi has lived longer than the prognosis said he would, then I'm afraid your faith in medical predictions of life expectancy is over-confident.
I haven't written a memo. MacAskill did what he was supposed to do - make a decision based on the best medical advice he had available. What would you have wanted him to do (apart from make a different decision, I mean)? Ignore the best advice and just invent his own?
Could you define what "best" means in Scotland?
Already covered Professor Karol Sikora's dishonor and Dr Andrew Fraser's incompetence. Unless al-Megrahi actually died 9 months ago, what further research is necessary to recognize (as the Obama administration does) the stupidity of Scottish Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill decision?