Dr. Hirschhorn (Ret) Says Coverup! Prof of Metallurgical Eng, U.W Madison 1965-78

[pomeroo]

Yoohoo,

For the umpteenth trillion time - and I've been counting - the NIST Report is the evidence.

(It's just that the conclusion is wrong.)

Yes, Max, your conclusion is demonstrably wrong. Your stubborn refusal to abandon your fantasies stamps you as an agenda-driven crank.

 

[Mince]

I didn't see anything of a technical nature in that analysis. Is he going to use his expertise at some point?

The decline started before George W. Bush and his criminal co-
conspirators accelerated it with their blatant disregard for the rule
of law and our Constitution.

Apparently he's also a political analyst and a legal scholar. Jack of all trades...

 

[ComsatAngel2017]

Upon a hasty skim, I noticed that Mr Hirschhorn's post appears to consist of political diatribe, rather than any reasoned calculation. As noted above, paragraphs 5 & 6 are absolute Komedy gold. Paragraph 5's first sentence ("Technically sound analyses of what happened at the World Trade Center have unequivocally shown that the official 9/11 story is not credible (www.ae911truth.org)") has only 23 words, and yet manages to be more inaccurate in a shorter span than almost anything else I have read. The first 7 words of the next paragraph helped me to realise that Mr Hirschhorn must have forgotten to take his meds.

If this is the best the Twoofers have, then they are truly QED*.


* Quite Evidently, Dead.

 

[LashL]

I didn't see anything of a technical nature in that analysis. Is he going to use his expertise at some point?

Highly unlikely, based on the evidence to date.

Apparently he's also a political analyst and a legal scholar. Jack of all trades...

He's following the usual twoofer pattern of purporting to have expertise where he has none, while simultaneously failing to legitimately utilize any expertise that he may actually possess (because doing so in an honest fashion would not support the Truth™ movement's nonsensical stories.)

Upon a hasty skim, I noticed that Mr Hirschhorn's post appears to consist of political diatribe, rather than any reasoned calculation. As noted above, paragraphs 5 & 6 are absolute Komedy gold. Paragraph 5's first sentence ("Technically sound analyses of what happened at the World Trade Center have unequivocally shown that the official 9/11 story is not credible (www.ae911truth.org)") has only 23 words, and yet manages to be more inaccurate in a shorter span than almost anything else I have read. The first 7 words of the next paragraph helped me to realise that Mr Hirschhorn must have forgotten to take his meds.

If this is the best the Twoofers have, then they are truly QED*.


* Quite Evidently, Dead.

Indeed. And this guy is quite evidently delusional. QED

 

[peteweaver]

Fear not little chickadees, Hirschhorn will soon enough learn to MAX-MIHOP a fantasic new dance I've invented which involves filling the gaps in your shoes with thermite, then dancing like billio

Sorry Max but I couldn't resist.

 

[Alferd_Packer]

More from Joel

None of the comments here indicate that people have sincerely examined the many materials on the websites I gave in the article. An honest, intelligent and open minded person must spend considerable hours examining the evidence, as I and many thousands of others have done. What I see in the comments is a chronic lack of good informaton. By the way, it is the official story of WTC that is inconsistent with the laws of physics. If you are too stupid, too brainwashed and too afraid then you will keep supporting the corrupt political system and its BS about 9/11. Spend some time at www.patriotsquestion911.com and ask yourself how so many credible, smart and well known people could reject the official story, unless there was a mountain of evidence undermining the official story. Or stay lazy and bamboozled by the government.

http://www.atlanticfreepress.com/content/view/3080/81/

it warms my heart to know that there are people out there like this who are only too willing to tell us what to think.

 

[twinstead]

You either think like me or you're lazy and bamboozled. Excellent.

 

[Hans]

Now that's scary.

Man that makes me want to stay in the ME and not come back to the US

 

[HereticHulk]

This is the key part.

This is the crux of the entire 9/11 movement. It has no evidential foundation.

It was an inside job, is their premise and their conclusion. The middle part, the part where they provide evidence is nonexistent.

Evidence has been and continues to be covered up and/or destroyed. How can you request evidence? All the people who seek truth have at this point is speculation and logic. Connect the dots! cui bono?

OBL has still not been found!

It has to make you wonder why the expenditure of the investigation re: the largest attack on American soil is less then the Monica Lewinsky investigation.

 

[JimBenArm]

Evidence has been and continues to be covered up and/or destroyed. How can you request evidence? All the people who seek truth have at this point is speculation and logic. Connect the dots! cui bono?

OBL has still not been found!

It has to make you wonder why the expenditure of the investigation re: the largest attack on American soil is less then the Monica Lewinsky investigation.

Really? All you have is speculation and innuendo (logic? ha!) not because the evidence was destroyed but because it never existed in the first place except in that special place where unicorns and fairies play.