bruto
Penultimate Amazing
snarkiness aside (it's just too tempting sometimes) I agree with wardenclyffe, that this would be an interesting subject to arrange for a scientific test, especially if you're willing to be objective. I've known a few people who were convinced they could dowse for water pipes and wires with metal rods like those you describe, but as others have noted, it's pretty hard for someone who is convinced of the phenomenon to accept negative results. I suspect there are many subtle factors involved in the process, including experience in where to expect such hidden objects leading to good choice in primary search areas, cues from terrain, as well as a willingness to accept near misses as hits, that would have to be overcome in a scientific test. Figuring out how to do this would be an interesting exercise, and enlightening by itself no matter what the results are.
One thing I do know, having tried it myself, is that if you do know where the buried wires or pipes are, the rods will almost certainly work. You'll really have to test blind to make the test objective.
edited to add, of course you'd have to test blind, but what I guess I meant was that you'll also have to make sure that the test takes the environmental clues, etc. into account, so that you can make sure of what is being tested.
One thing I do know, having tried it myself, is that if you do know where the buried wires or pipes are, the rods will almost certainly work. You'll really have to test blind to make the test objective.
edited to add, of course you'd have to test blind, but what I guess I meant was that you'll also have to make sure that the test takes the environmental clues, etc. into account, so that you can make sure of what is being tested.
Last edited: