• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Doubletree Video Delayed

First off Bell, I have to traveled to your wonderful country. The beauty of your women is only exceeded by the quality of the food.

Thanks StoneWT. But most of our food is foreign (but well prepared). We do excell at poffertjes :)

In the US, a 50-year-old building that Elvis Presley used the toilet in is considered historic. In Holland, a 500-year-old building barely raises a snort. :)

Steve Martin: "Some of these buildings are 20 years old!" :D

Prince Bernhard was invloved with founding the Bildeberg group. I'm guessing that people assume all Dutch royalty is in on the NWO.

Even queen Beatrix' family is not safe from the NWO:

In the year 2003 a series of incidents had become known as the Margarita-affair. In the media, Margarita and her husband accused the Royal House and the Dutch Secret Service of obstructing the affairs of Fincentives, the company of De Roy van Zuydewijn. They also said their telephone-conversations were tapped. Although there seemed to be truth in these accusations, they ridiculed themselves by adding more preposperous claims and telling tales of private family affairs of the Dutch Royals. After it was revealed that the Queen's personal cabinet had indeed ordered an investigation, the right to do so was legally removed from the Queen.

Source

They thought that screws that were in the ceiling were actually microphones... :tinfoil

And Edwin de Roy van Zuydewijn is a troofer, nuff said.
 
Just the honest truth and the full story. The USG should be appreciated and defended in their handling of 9/11. They have done a great job all the way from ignoring the memos to the White House about Osama months before right up to disposing of conspiracy theories in a timely fashion!



The US government is not under any obligation to disprove wackjob conspiracy theories. Sorry, Russ, you live in a CT dream world.
 
Mitch Hedberg on Doubletree



"The girl at the front desk must have really liked me, she gave me her number. It was '0.' I tried to call her from here, but some other lady answered."
 
http://www.flight77.info/
It seems Dec 21st is the day.

I continue to read more and more information stating that it WILL show a glimpse of the plane.

flight77.info said:
As stated in the last page of the Maguire Statement, whatever is on this video, it will not be the impact. It will likely be a glimpse of the flight.

And that is based on what exactly?

Neither the FOIA request, nor the FBI response, talk about AA77's flight captured on video, only about the impact. I think this video will show as much AA77 as the Citgo video... nothing.
 
Well, shoot, I'm convinced. Obviously the Doubletree Hotel is responsible for Sept. 11th. That's a joke, for the sarcasm-impaired.

Look, you're already setting yourself up to discount the video, no matter what it shows, on the basis of "Government tampering." So why even bother?

my thoughts exactly.

your predictable russell.

cheers
 
And that is based on what exactly?

Neither the FOIA request, nor the FBI response, talk about AA77's flight captured on video, only about the impact. I think this video will show as much AA77 as the Citgo video... nothing.


and the cter's are going to claim "cover up"! and dance in the streets.
 
And that is based on what exactly?

Neither the FOIA request, nor the FBI response, talk about AA77's flight captured on video, only about the impact. I think this video will show as much AA77 as the Citgo video... nothing.

So far it has been based on rumor. I've heard a few reports now that state it will show a plane. A news reporter (I believe from CNN) was the first to make the claim.
 
So far it has been based on rumor. I've heard a few reports now that state it will show a plane. A news reporter (I believe from CNN) was the first to make the claim.

Anyhow, who cares if it shows a plane? (yeah, we do) But the nutters will claim ILM has obvious faked the video :)
 
Anyhow, who cares if it shows a plane? (yeah, we do) But the nutters will claim ILM has obvious faked the video :)

Just like any other damning evidence, I suspect if it DOES show a plane with decent quality they will HAVE to claim its a fake.
Some people have too much money, time, ego invested to say otherwise.
 

Back
Top Bottom