Or, do you mean I don't know how to treat women like ◊◊◊◊?
Only as a subset of not knowing anything about women in general. I'd almost be impressed if you could identify one (hint, they're the ones that look more like your mom than your dad)
Or, do you mean I don't know how to treat women like ◊◊◊◊?
Or, do you mean I don't know how to treat women like ◊◊◊◊? This is your arrogance speaking here.
Actually, I used to prefer the company of men, because I didn't have to worry about going to bed with them. Now I prefer the company of women, much easier to bond to emotionally, albeit most of the women I know are married. And so limits any kind of relationship in that respect.My thoughts:
Based on the latest blathering from Iacchus, he's single, he lives in his parents' basement, and a virgin.
Has to be, he obviously doesn't know ◊◊◊◊ about women.
Actually, I used to prefer the company of men, because I didn't have to worry about going to bed with them. Now I prefer the company of women, much easier to bond to emotionally, albeit most of the women I know are married. Which limits any kind of relationship in that respect.
Or, maybe I just maintain a higher ideal and respect for women? I can't think of anything more than being caught up in a woman's embrace. Women are ecstatic creatures. They are the bearers of the essence of who we are.I bet my wife would love to kick him in the goolies. And then request that he leave town.
Or, maybe I just maintain a higher ideal and respect for women? I can't think of anything more than being caught up in a woman's embrace. Women are ecstatic creatures. They are the bearers of the essence of who we are.
Or, maybe I just maintain a higher ideal and respect for women? I can't think of anything more than being caught up in a woman's embrace. Women are ecstatic creatures. They are the bearers of the essence of who we are.
Or, maybe I just maintain a higher ideal and respect for women? I can't think of anything more than being caught up in a woman's embrace. Women are ecstatic creatures. They are the bearers of the essence of who we are.
Or, maybe I just maintain a higher ideal and respect for women? I can't think of anything more than being caught up in a woman's embrace. Women are ecstatic creatures. They are the bearers of the essence of who we are.
LostAngeles said:I'm under the impression that Iacchus believes that females are gentle and graceful creatures, delicate creations of spun sugar that can neither do no harm to others without provocation or make decisions on their own. Females will never attack their own unless highly provoked by another one of these etheral beings. They would never willingly show off their body or engage in sexual activit publicly unless the brutish, savage, and thuggish beasts known as males would force them too. They have no pride, no arrogance to interrupt their peaceful existance in the magic of their monthly blood.
No, we females are incapable of such things. We're like pretty dolphins who jump into the air and do incredible and beauteous acrobatics and would never bludgeon an orca to death.
Have you considered prostitution?
You folks really have a lot to prove to the world don't you? What, is it possible that your manliness is coming up to question?
You folks really have a lot to prove to the world don't you? What, is it possible that your manliness is coming up for question? Yep, time to drum those feathers and strut your stuff, huh?
You folks really have a lot to prove to the world don't you? What, is it possible that your manliness is coming up for question? Yep, time to drum those feathers and strut your stuff, huh?
So, what are we trying to prove then, cousin?For the record, from the second the ultrasound was done while I was in my mother's womb, my manliness was never in question.
In fact, I just checked. I don't question my manliness still.
Y'know, kind of like how I don't question Santa Claus.
So, what are we trying to prove then?
So, what are we trying to prove then?