Docker's OKC Bombing Conspiracy Thread

Docker said:
This is a government test. They were trying to show it was the truck bomb. I doubt they would use the wrong amount of explosive.

Keep digging.

Please debunk the other paper.
Click to expand...
You're acting as though I don't know the answer. I do. The quiz is for you. Answer the question.
 
Gravy said:
You're acting as though I don't know the answer. I do. The quiz is for you. Answer the question.
Click to expand...

Ok the amount on the test is half that in the truck. This was a a government test so I presume they were scaling the explosive down in line with another parameter.

No please debunk the generals paper.
 
Docker said:
Ok the amount on the test is half that in the truck. This was a a government test so I presume they were scaling the explosive down in line with another parameter.

No please debunk the generals paper.
Click to expand...


“Because ANFO is also a low-energy explosive (approximately 30%
that of TNT) and due to the inherent inefficiency of eight barrels
forming the explosive assembly [according to the government’s
estimates], it is doubtful that the device produced blast pressures
close to the calculated maximum potential blast pressure,” the
study asserts. “This being the case, it is doubtful that the
radius of damage even approached the 42.37 foot range as calculated
herein.”

There you go gravy. Nice try, now please commence your debunking.
 
Last edited:
Im waiting gravy. You having some trouble? Google can be slow at this time can't it.
 
Docker said:
“Because ANFO is also a low-energy explosive (approximately 30%
that of TNT) and due to the inherent inefficiency of eight barrels
forming the explosive assembly [according to the government’s
estimates], it is doubtful that the device produced blast pressures
close to the calculated maximum potential blast pressure,” the
study asserts. “This being the case, it is doubtful that the
radius of damage even approached the 42.37 foot range as calculated
herein.”

There you go gravy. Nice try, now please commence your debunking.
Click to expand...
Don't think we're quite done here, Docker. How does this quote relate to the size of the actual and test explosives?
 
To keep this from being an excruciatingly drawn-out lesson, I'll ask my next question, which I have a feeling would be necessary anyway:

Docker, when we double the size of an explosive charge, what should we expect to happen to its blast effects?

1) It will be twice as strong.
2) It will be 2.5x stronger
3) It will be 4x stronger
4) It will be 8x stronger
5) On Planet X, all explosions are the same size
 
Gravy said:
To keep this from being an excruciatingly drawn-out lesson, I'll ask my next question, which I have a feeling would be necessary anyway:

Docker, when we double the size of an explosive charge, what should we expect to happen to its blast effects?

1) It will be twice as strong.
2) It will be 2.5x stronger
3) It will be 4x stronger
4) It will be 8x stronger
5) On Planet X, all explosions are the same size
Click to expand...

Are you going to debunk it or not.

If you don'y want to just say so.

I have no time for your quizzes. I have presented evidence backed by many experts. If you can't refute it then stop wasting my time.
 
Gravy said:
Don't think we're quite done here, Docker. How does this quote relate to the size of the actual and test explosives?
Click to expand...

The quote says that the 8 barrel assembly of the truck bomb will serious reduce the explosive force. The tes uses proper explosives and so adjustments have been made. The building in the test is considerably weaker too.

Now will you please show me why the many experts cited are wrong. We all love experts right?
 
EXPLAIN THIS YOU NWO SHILLS!!!1111oneoneoneone


TRUCK2.gif


Yes, it's a Ryder truck IN A MILITARY BASE!!!1111oneoneoneone
 
Thats right, gravy has gone AWOL.
Click to expand...

So you expect him to sit here 24/7 and cater to your every whim?
You gave him til Christmas.
Docker said:
Gravy I await your thorough debunking of this. BHy christmas will do, no rush.
Click to expand...

Its 4 in the morning here on the east coast, mans gotta sleep sometime.
Is there a rush or were you just lying when you said there was no rush?.
By my calendar Christmas is 2 months away.
 
Last edited:
Skibum said:
So you expect him to sit here 24/7 and cater to your every whim?
You gave him til Christmas.


Its 4 in the morning here on the east coast, mans gotta sleep sometime.
Is there a rush or were you just lying when you said there was no rush?.
By my calendar Christmas is 2 months away.
Click to expand...

Face it. hes bottled it. He can't produce the goods when real evidence confronts him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom