Different languages and God?

[Kilik]

http://www.webcom.com/mhc/archaeology/deca...agrammaton.html
http://www.yahweh.com/PWMags/PW11-04/theName2.html

The DSS are the oldest copy of biblical texts. YHVH is foundational and key to it, regardless of anything. Truth is truth however far back in antiquity it might go
http://www.handwritingfoundation.org/deadsea.htm

The discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls was hailed as an important discovery because it provided archaeological proof of the antiquity of the Old Testament scriptures.

Although many of the scrolls are written in Aramaic script, other languages were also used, such as Greek. Some fragments were written in old Hebrew called Paleo-Hebrew and a few were written in a secret script for initiates. An interesting and important scroll called the Habakkuk Commentary [Figure 3], is an illustration of square Hebrew script or Aramaic used in the 1st and 2nd centuries B.C. Note, however, the use of an ancient Hebrew script employed on line 10 to write the divine name of the Lord. The slant on the four letter word which represents the name of God as YHWH also has a different lettering style.

so there is much depth to investigate in the DSS

http://www.encyclopediaofauthentichinduism...e_origin_of.htm

Hebrew Aplhabet

Tarot
http://www.crystalinks.com/tarot.html

But what needs to be considered, is that very far back in time some people had no writing system. In fact, what might not be so commonly known is that Egypt, the Tarot, and travelling "Gypsies" were the start of various different civilizations written language and their spiritual teachings which eventually became religous concepts

 

[Odin]

KILIK HOW MANY TIMES MUST WE TELL YOU- SPAMMING LINKS ANGERS THE GODS!

Please Listen Kilik! When Yahweh gets angry he starts Smiting and I won't be able to stop him!

 

[Odin]

Haven't you posted that Hebrew letters thing before?

 

[Zep]

How soon before we start yet another round of Mornington Crescent?

 

[The Don]

Turnham Green

 

[Cleon]

ok, Kilik, first of all, speaking as someone who actually READS Hebrew, the chart above is largely incorrect.

Second of all, this statement:

In fact, what might not be so commonly known is that Egypt, the Tarot, and travelling "Gypsies" were the start of various different civilizations written language and their spiritual teachings which eventually became religous concepts

is completely historically incorrect. First of all, the earliest mention of Tarot is the 14th century, long after every modern form of writing was already established. Second, the Egyptians' form of writing--hieroglyphics--died with them. Hebrew and Latin are alphabetical, rather than hieroglyphic, forms and stole the concept from the Phoenicians. Finally, the "Gypsy" cultures such as Roma and Sinti are only about 1000 years old--again, long after modern written communication was formed.

This is another example of you not knowing what you're talking about, yet deciding that you "know it is true."

 

[Ersby]

ok, Kilik, first of all, speaking as someone who actually READS Hebrew, the chart above is largely incorrect.

This is another example of you not knowing what you're talking about, yet deciding that you "know it is true."

I'm just quoting this in a vain attempt that Kilik might actually read and repsond to it.

 

[Belz...]

Please Listen Kilik! When Yahweh gets angry he starts Smiting and I won't be able to stop him.

And ALL the pantheons agree on this!

 

[Kilik]

which chart? How is it incorrect? And how is that aspect of it relevant to anthing I said?

 

[Cleon]

which chart?

You only posted one. And I said, "speaking as someone who actually READS Hebrew." Based on that, it shouldn't be hard to figure out which one.

How is it incorrect?

Shape of letters, for starters. While some of them may have been accurate at various points, it's completely ahistorical regarding the development of the Hebrew alphabet.

The correspondence to English letters is completely wacked.

And how is that aspect of it relevant to anthing I said?

You posted it! You tell me!

It doesn't correspond to this either

But it still relates to the subject and shows some good ideas

You're right Kilik. Never mind that you yourself can't figure out how it's relevant, never mind that it's completely incorrect, it's ok, because "it still relates to the subject and shows some good ideas."

You're just wrong, Kilik, on this question and on many others. If you still can't admit that, despite the fact that we've shown you exactly how, maybe it's time for you to find a different board to troll.

 

[Kilik]

It doesn't correspond to this either

But it still relates to the subject and shows some good ideas

So what exactly are you saying about this all

maybe the other chart is just using a different form of writing the same thing

 

[Zep]

Because the higher the fewer, Kilik.

 

[Kilik]

You're just wrong, Kilik, on this question and on many others. If you still can't admit that, despite the fact that we've shown you exactly how, maybe it's time for you to find a different board to troll.

It's relevant in the way that you see charts of evolution depicted. In one time zone you'd see dinosaurs, and later on in the timel line, mammals would be depicted.

The picture show a gap, between written language and spoken language, and it does that pretty well

Now if the chart on EVOLUTION of the earth, does not portray accurate dinosaurs, it must be discarded as not true right?

They couldn't EVEN draw a perfect dinosaur!

 

[Zep]

AND...!

There are no bones in ice-cream!

 

[Kilik]

What hebrew do you read? Because several kinds were mentioned

there were gypsies far back in time, and the real Tarot cards, are much older than recorded in history. Perhaps they were reintroduced. But there is no doubt the Tarot is prehistoric, older than the bible, as old as the I Ching

 

[Cleon]

It's relevant in the way that you see charts of evolution depicted. In one time zone you'd see dinosaurs, and later on in the timel line, mammals would be depicted.

Dinosaurs did not evolve into mammals, Kilik. Is this going to be yet another subject where you establish your ignorance?

The picture show a gap, between written language and spoken language, and it does that pretty well

No, Kilik, it doesn't. It doesn't show any such thing, much less do it well.

Now if the chart on EVOLUTION of the earth, does not portray accurate dinosaurs, it must be discarded as not true right?

They couldn't EVEN draw a perfect dinosaur!

#1, the difference is, Hebrew is still around. Dinosaurs--not so much.
#2, show me said chart of the evolution of the earth. Go ahead. Show me.

 

[Kilik]

BUt perhaps original hebrew is not around or perhaps it is altered.

HOw is knowing that mammals came after dinosaurs ignorant? The earth went through many periods, one was called the Jurassic period. You may have heard of the movie called Jurassic Park.

However, mammals came at a later time in the earth's evolution timescale

Plus, you don't know where anything came from

 

[Cleon]

What hebrew do you read? Because several kinds were mentioned

Well, Kilik, it's really a moot point, seeing as how you don't know enough about the subject to tell the difference. I would suggest you not post about things you do not understand, but somehow I think that suggestion would fall on deaf ears.

there were gypsies far back in time,

No, Kilik, there weren't. 1000 ad is as far back as they go.

and the real Tarot cards, are much older than recorded in history.

No, Kilik, they're not.

But there is no doubt the Tarot is prehistoric, older than the bible, as old as the I Ching

Yes, Kilik, there is very much doubt on that score.

 

[Kilik]

No. I don't need to know every language to understand what it is generally about, or to read ABOUT the languages, or to find certain historical fats, which then indicate other things are also true.

 

[Cleon]

BUt perhaps original hebrew is not around or perhaps it is altered.

"Perhaps?" Wouldn't it be a better idea to learn these things before posting on the subject?

HOw is knowing that mammals came after dinosaurs ignorant?

I repeat: dinosaurs did not evolve into mammals.

The earth went through many periods, one was called the Jurassic period. You may have heard of the movie called Jurassic Park.

You're right, Kilik, how could I forget the scientific breakthrough that was Jurassic Park.

Plus, you don't know where anything came from

Riiiight.