Defending Sylvia....

[RenaissanceBiker]

Well, a friend of mine sort of within the confines of Novus has begun a new blog: www.defendingsylvia.blogspot.com.

I guess it's a sincere attempt at defending the heroine.

If interested, take a stroll over.

Definitely an unexpected twist! I was completely fooled.

Didn't NotARepublican say that it was written by a friend of his/hers who is connected with NS, and that it was supposed to be sincere?

... and that's today's Word.

 

[Slimething]

The blogger has contacted me.

He/she says that the blog was an attempt at an obvious, Colbert-like satire of a Browne supporter.

After seeing that the was not as "obvious" as had been hoped, he/she has decided to take the site down.

I sure didn't think it was satire. If I had, I would not have linked to it.

Poe's Law strikes again. That's why god gave us smilies.

 

[Mr. Stick]

The blogger has contacted me.

He/she says that the blog was an attempt at an obvious, Colbert-like satire of a Browne supporter.

After seeing that the was not as "obvious" as had been hoped, he/she has decided to take the site down.

I sure didn't think it was satire. If I had, I would not have linked to it.

Poe's Law strikes again. That's why god gave us smilies.

I didn't know Poe's Law before, but that's excactly what I thought. It's nearly impossible to do a satire of a true Browne follower. Much stranger things has been written in full seriousness.

 

[PastBrowneFan]

"Defending Sylvia", sounds like a future book to be written by her Criminal Attorney after the AG and IRS look into her Business and Spiritual dealings.

 

[SeekingTruth]

"Defending Sylvia", sounds like a future book to be written by her Criminal Attorney after the AG and IRS look into her Business and Spiritual dealings.

There isno defense for her dispicable behavior - or that of her staff.

ST

 

[Locknar]

Did NotARepublican ever answer the question about the blogg that started this thread? He/she said it was a friends blogg (or sorts) and it was a sincere attempt; RSL was told by the blogg owner it was suppose to be satire.

NotARepublican did the same thing in another thread; posted about a blogg - turned out HE/SHE was the owner.

NotARepublican - Whats the deal?

 

[RSLancastr]

Yes, NAR 'fessed up to being the author of the Defending Sylvia blog. It was supposed to be a satire, but didn't work out.

 

[Locknar]

Yes, NAR 'fessed up to being the author of the Defending Sylvia blog. It was supposed to be a satire, but didn't work out.

AH....ok; when you had said the "blogger" had contacted you, I didn't associate that with NAR.

 

[RSLancastr]

AH....ok; when you had said the "blogger" had contacted you, I didn't associate that with NAR.

I said "blogger" because at that point, NAR had not made it public that he was the blogger.

 

[Locknar]

I said "blogger" because at that point, NAR had not made it public that he was the blogger.

Doh! I re-read NARs 6 JUN post in another thread ("godsobsession")...got it now I must have missed it when I read it before.