Dear Al Qaeda

I was wondering if you could maybe summarize your objections to the western world and the US in particular. I know you've made many statements about this, but it is so tedious trying to find them when nobody's made a video compilation of them.
Actually...

Google Video This video is not hosted by the ISF, the ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.
I AGREE


Google Video This video is not hosted by the ISF, the ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.
I AGREE
 
Here is a question(s) I want the truthers to answer.

If OBL is a CIA Shill (which many of you claim) then why (1) did he initially deny his role in 9/11, (2) why would they have to use a fake OBL for the confession tape (as you all claim it is not the real one)?

Take your time, think about the questions and your answers, then let me know? Thanks

TAM
 
Just a FYI here, the best book I have ever read regarding our involvement in the Soviet/Afghanistan conflict was Charley Wilsons' War by George Crile . It may not be the most in-depth and scholary work, but it does show how things work (or don't work) in Washington DC, and how a conspiracy (to keep the aid to the Afghans quiet from other parts of the US Government) really works--small numbers of people involved and nothing spectacular.

Very good read.
 
Actually...

Google Video This video is not hosted by the ISF, the ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.
I AGREE


Google Video This video is not hosted by the ISF, the ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.
I AGREE


Why "Bolero" of all pieces?? Talk about incongruity.

Surely Philip Glass' "1,000 Airplanes on the Roof" would have made a better aesthetic choice.

WHICH LEADS ME to yet another Smoking Gun in the Great 9/11 Conspiracy:

"1,000 Airplanes on the Roof" first premiered in 1988 in an airplane hangar in Vienna.

Just look at the names of the tracks on that CD:

1. 1000 Airplanes on the Roof
2. City Walk
3. Girlfriend
4. My Building Disappeared
5. Screens of Memory
6. What Time is Grey
7. Labyrinth
8. Return to the Hive
9. Three Truths
10. The Encounter
11. Grey Cloud Over New York
12. Where Have You Been asked The Doctor
13. A Normal Man Running

This very obviously foreshadows the events of 9/11. I'm sure that for every title, you can think of a photograph or image from that day that would perfectly captioned by it.

And of course, let's not leave out that Philip Glass is a Joooooooooo.

:woowoo:
 
Why "Bolero" of all pieces?? Talk about incongruity.
I actually think it works quite well. :con2:
Surely Philip Glass' "1,000 Airplanes on the Roof" would have made a better aesthetic choice.

WHICH LEADS ME to yet another Smoking Gun in the Great 9/11 Conspiracy:

"1,000 Airplanes on the Roof" first premiered in 1988 in an airplane hangar in Vienna.

Just look at the names of the tracks on that CD:



This very obviously foreshadows the events of 9/11. I'm sure that for every title, you can think of a photograph or image from that day that would perfectly captioned by it.

And of course, let's not leave out that Philip Glass is a Joooooooooo.

:woowoo:
:yikes: He must be in league with The Coup!!!

coupwtc.jpg
 
P.S. You'll find plenty of those guys think Osama did not mastermind your operation and also that at least 7 of your martyrs are not in Paradise.

(Perry. You're awful. But I do like you. :D)

It is my understanding that Osama did not mastermind 9/11 (he "green lit" and funded it)

Make that "masterminded greenlight or fund".

and, as a (weak) atheist, I'm pretty sure that none of his murdering psychotic lackeys are either martyrs or in paradise.

I agree (as a fairly strong atheist), but SHHHH! We're not dobbing ourselves in to Al Qaeda, only the troofers. :mglook ;)


I've always imagined that the virgins promised to Islamic martyrs were really ugly goats, sheep, or other farm animals. Poetic justice...

New research by Christoph Luxenberg says they were promised raisins, not virgins.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/saturday_review/story/0,3605,631332,00.html

The article (by Ibn Warraq) also notes that suicide is forbidden in Islam.
 
Dear Perry,
Who are these racist young white males who think that Muslems are too ignorant to hijack planes? The PLO and other groups have been hijacking planes since the 1950s. This proves that Muslems can take over a plane. There are also many Muslem pilots...so this shows that we can also fly planes. So now that we have established that Muslems can hijack planes...and can fly them...why exactly are Muslems unable to fly them into the largest buildings in the USA?

I repeat....the WTC Towers and the Pentagon were the largest buildings in the USA. I think we Muslems are capable of flying into them.
 
You are aware of the beginnings of the bogey man? That it was the CIA who organized and recruited them for the war against the Soviets in Afghanistan?
Ok Mr. Backasswards, in 2000 Bill Clinton made a trip into Pakistan and was asked by the CIA to cancel because_________? Can you explain why he had Air Force one fly ahead with him following in an unmarked plane?
 
Dear Perry,
Who are these racist young white males who think that Muslems are too ignorant to hijack planes? The PLO and other groups have been hijacking planes since the 1950s. This proves that Muslems can take over a plane...I repeat....the WTC Towers and the Pentagon were the largest buildings in the USA. I think we Muslems are capable of flying into them.
In case I didn't make myself clear, I agree with you about this. It's the Truthers who ignore reality and say "terrorists on a cave" couldn't have done it.
 
It is my understanding that Osama did not mastermind 9/11 (he "green lit" and funded it)

Make that "masterminded greenlight or fund".



I agree (as a fairly strong atheist), but SHHHH! We're not dobbing ourselves in to Al Qaeda, only the troofers. :mglook ;)




New research by Christoph Luxenberg says they were promised raisins, not virgins.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/saturday_review/story/0,3605,631332,00.html

The article (by Ibn Warraq) also notes that suicide is forbidden in Islam.

RAISINS?! Who knew?
 
Al Qaeda Doesn't Exist

"Commenting on the possible role of Al Qaeda, (Tony) Blair said, "Al Qaeda is not an organization. Al Qaeda is a way of working ..."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,162476,00.html

Al-Qaeda or al-Qaida (Arabic: القاعدة, translit: al-Qā`ida; "the Law", "the foundation", or "the base") is a militant Sunni Islamist organization ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_qaeda

There is no organization... the US has taken small scattered groups of militants... and morphed them into some unified global threat. There are no sleeper cells... no complex plots and/or plans like 9/11. Why? BECAUSE there is NO ORGANIZATION!

Main Entry: or·ga·ni·za·tion
Pronunciation: "or-g&-n&-'zA-sh&n, "org-n&-
Function: noun

1 a : the act or process of organizing or of being organized b : the condition or manner of being organized

"Those labeled "terrorists" rarely identify themselves as such, and typically use other generic terms or terms specific to their situation, such as: separatist, freedom fighter, liberator, revolutionary, vigilante, militant, paramilitary, guerrilla, rebel, jihadi or mujaheddin, or fedayeen, or any similar-meaning word in other languages."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism

When OBL and the Taliban were fighting the Soviets, the US called them Freedom Fighters... now... when the US has a new agenda... they simply reframe the situation and label these same people as terrorists. OBL and "Militant Islam," are nothing more than pawns... manipulated by the USG to further their political agendas.
 
Al-Qaeda, is the name given to the group of jihadists pledging allegance to or working under the umbrella of OBL, and may or may not have been trained by others who follow him.

Prove the above statement wrong 28th.

TAM
 
Dear Perry,
Who are these racist young white males who think that Muslems are too ignorant to hijack planes? The PLO and other groups have been hijacking planes since the 1950s. This proves that Muslems can take over a plane. There are also many Muslem pilots...so this shows that we can also fly planes. So now that we have established that Muslems can hijack planes...and can fly them...why exactly are Muslems unable to fly them into the largest buildings in the USA?

I repeat....the WTC Towers and the Pentagon were the largest buildings in the USA. I think we Muslems are capable of flying into them.

Yes any idiot can fly a 757/767 into a building. The terrorist wasted money learning to fly; it is just too easy to do what they did; why do you think they were able to hit their giant targets.

But even kids could fly into buildings.

But I think it takes an extra dumbness to fly yourself with the jet into the building! Dumb to the nth degree. I would have asked UBL to demostrate first!
 
Al Qaeda Doesn't Exist

"Commenting on the possible role of Al Qaeda, (Tony) Blair said, "Al Qaeda is not an organization. Al Qaeda is a way of working ..."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,162476,00.html

Al-Qaeda or al-Qaida (Arabic: القاعدة, translit: al-Qā`ida; "the Law", "the foundation", or "the base") is a militant Sunni Islamist organization ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_qaeda

There is no organization... the US has taken small scattered groups of militants... and morphed them into some unified global threat. There are no sleeper cells... no complex plots and/or plans like 9/11. Why? BECAUSE there is NO ORGANIZATION!

Main Entry: or·ga·ni·za·tion
Pronunciation: "or-g&-n&-'zA-sh&n, "org-n&-
Function: noun

1 a : the act or process of organizing or of being organized b : the condition or manner of being organized

"Those labeled "terrorists" rarely identify themselves as such, and typically use other generic terms or terms specific to their situation, such as: separatist, freedom fighter, liberator, revolutionary, vigilante, militant, paramilitary, guerrilla, rebel, jihadi or mujaheddin, or fedayeen, or any similar-meaning word in other languages."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism

When OBL and the Taliban were fighting the Soviets, the US called them Freedom Fighters... now... when the US has a new agenda... they simply reframe the situation and label these same people as terrorists. OBL and "Militant Islam," are nothing more than pawns... manipulated by the USG to further their political agendas.

You left!

You are a liar,; you said bye!! But that is not new;' all your posts are lies.

28th brings up freedom fighters then and what do you call them after 9/11?

X-freedom fighters or are they indians wanting NYC back!

Doulbe triple talk is back and his name is 28th! He is back!
 
28th Kingdom, a little hint:

Ideological bias does not an argument make. You might as well be a rabid jingoist Bush supporter trying to convince us Bush is not an idiot. Neither of you are right.

If objectivity were shoelaces your shoes would keep falling off.
 
You left!

You are a liar,; you said bye!! But that is not new;' all your posts are lies.

28th brings up freedom fighters then and what do you call them after 9/11?

X-freedom fighters or are they indians wanting NYC back!

Doulbe triple talk is back and his name is 28th! He is back!

Maybe he edited that post??
 

Back
Top Bottom