Sure, but the Darwin awards aren't actually about human evolution. That's just the conceit, the actual purpose is entertainment. So criteria are adjusted to make them either looser or stricter than simple evolution would require, in order to satisfy the entertainment demands.
Yeah. It's really about how stupidly men and sometimes women find a way to shuffle their mortal coil. Something most of would think, "wow, that was dumb."
"He" was in my brain. Mom's prediction came true. "You're going to get goin' too fast with that stuff you toss around, son."
Should be more cautious, like me. I knew what I wanted, I worked where they made them. ♫I got it one piece at a time♫
If you dispense with the requirement that it actually happened.
Which might not have been there when Rolfe saw the story.
Maybe skeptics shouldn't just accept what they read from random accounts on X as the Gospel Truth.
How are the accuracy of community notes ascertained?
I won't disagree, but that's different from accusing someone of being blind.
I don’t think it was there when I commented on it.
Here's the link:
leadstories.com
Agree... Always check the history of the account to see...
