The Great Zaganza
Maledictorian
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2016
- Messages
- 29,759
Expect intimidations at polling stations in support of Adams by members of the the biggest gang in NY, aka the NYPD.
That would work except the stores would be able to continue to engage in rampant profiteering.It's a strange one - if it is too expensive for most people than despite groceries technically being available it is in fact a food desert for those that can't afford it.
I would have thought looking at what keeps the prices high would be a better approach - if it is the business rates/taxes then perhaps reducing those would be a more effective approach rather than having to build up supply chain etc. for the new city businesses. The local authority could look at incentivising tax reductions based on what the store stocks and sells.
Will they be wearing their brown shirts or their black ones?Expect intimidations at polling stations in support of Adams by members of the the biggest gang in NY, aka the NYPD.
Hey, give it time, we've (or his orangeness the King, credit where credit is due) only just discovered the concept of groceries, they obviously need time to adapt.That would work except the stores would be able to continue to engage in rampant profiteering.
As a rule, I'd say theyI have been told all my life that government-run companies can never compete with private run ones - was I being lied to?
Even if the private sector is providing essential goods, if the state moves into the market, they will eventually squeeze out the private sector as long as the state gives itself advantages, they private sector can't; tax breaks, subsidies and such.If the private sector can't provide essential goods, it is the Obligation of the State to provide an alternative.
Groceries are generally exempt from sales tax.Groceries stores operate at an average profit margin or 2 1/2%, sales tax in NY city is more than 8%. The private sector cannot compete with a competitor that automatically gets a 5% advantage. Meanwhile, NY taxpayers, the very folks benefiting from the city groceries are just paying the tax on the back end instead of the front end. And off course the city will have reduced tax income on account of less sales taxes from groceries. The there's if groceries in the city run stores are actually cheaper, instant black market.
My assumption is that state run retail can always out compete private concerns because the state can always subsidize their own operations via taxes.Groceries are generally exempt from sales tax.
There seem to be some unwarranted assumptions at work here--that if the city is successful with public grocery stores they'll just build them everywhere. I don't see why they'd do that. The motivations for expansion of a public service are different from those of a private business.
There's also an assumption that grocery stores can't compete with a store with lower prices. The existence of high-end chains should make it obvious that this isn't really true. I expect these stores, if we ever see them, will be fairly no-frills.
Even if the private sector is providing essential goods, if the state moves into the market, they will eventually squeeze out the private sector as long as the state gives itself advantages, they private sector can't; tax breaks, subsidies and such.
Groceries stores operate at an average profit margin or 2 1/2%, sales tax in NY city is more than 8%. The private sector cannot compete with a competitor that automatically gets a 5% advantage. Meanwhile, NY taxpayers, the very folks benefiting from the city groceries are just paying the tax on the back end instead of the front end. And off course the city will have reduced tax income on account of less sales taxes from groceries. The there's if groceries in the city run stores are actually cheaper, instant black market.
My assumption is that state run retail can always out compete private concerns because the state can always subsidize their own operations via taxes.
My understanding is that Mamdami's idea is that the advantage his city runs stores will have is by being exempt from taxes. If that is his plan and private groceries already are, well, what's the point? To run stores at a loss? Then were do the funds come from?
Probably, but the plan here isn't to outcompete existing stores, it to fill the gaps where private concerns aren't meeting the needs of the neighborhood.My assumption is that state run retail can always out compete private concerns because the state can always subsidize their own operations via taxes.
The bigger advantage is that the stores will be run out of underutilized city-owned buildings--effectively rent free and property tax free.My understanding is that Mamdami's idea is that the advantage his city runs stores will have is by being exempt from taxes. If that is his plan and private groceries already are, well, what's the point? To run stores at a loss? Then were do the funds come from?
Yeah, seems like exactly the kind of experimentation that federalism/home rule allows for. Let's try it out and see what happens.Regardless, I hope he makes it happen, I'm curious as to the results.
I have been told all my life that government-run companies can never compete with private run ones - was I being lied to?
That's just because they're a brand new phenomenon and King Dump hasn't worked out all the kinks yet.Groceries are generally exempt from sales tax.
So?? He blamed Israel's racist, inhumane and brutal decade's old policies for creating the fuel for Oct 7. Good for him.Mamdani blamed Netanhayu and Israel the day after the October 7 attacks
Edited by jimbob:
Spoilered link as though it's a Jerusalem Post link, it was reported as redirecting to a Russian website with a fake Macafee pop-up before going on to the Jerusalem Post
Not that that position is particularly controversial around here, but this is New York City.