• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

CTist chopping block

That kid ain't all there. I was on the Jack Blood forum starting last year till early this year. The kid had no problem, initially, and even welcomed me to the forum until I posted sourced information along with making definite statements. After that, he started making slobbering and incoherent posts filled with personal insults. He even photoshopped a picture of me into a bizarre caricature and placed it into his signature. He projected his obsession with a site called WINGTV onto me.

He also threatened to "kick my ass" on his show. He has a two-bit Internet radio show with a couple of dozen listeners. In the past, he offered a 'debate' in which I would spend time producing a proper presentation and he would simply show video clips along with laughing.

He wants to be taken seriously as a researcher, but he doesn't have the foggiest notion as to what he is doing. His defense mechanism kicked in and I became a publicity hound, someone that never produced anything of worth, and someone that was merely trying to make a buck. Total nutcase pushing his problems onto other people. Like most CTs, he is fine as long as you don't make him lose face in front of his sheep.
Yeah, he's still sore about our initial foray into Loose Change land:
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=11859&view=findpost&p=6984272

He made several challenges to debate people on his show, but never followed through when people took him up on it, then proceeded to call everyone he challenged "pu$$ies".
 
Eeew, I haven't seen that one before... make that 40%.
He's not a CT'er, but his ability to articulate is poor, and his patience with reading detailed explanations is on par with a lot of the sheeple in the US.

For all that, I think his heart is in the right place. He works in New York, with the Fire Department.

DR
 
chipmunk,

This waste of space started talking sh^t about the film, it's producers and it's proponants even before he had watched it. Pretty pathetic, huh?

The kid is also mentaly challenged. The quote he is referring to clearly states that the forum member WATCHED LC.

Has anyone else seen this 9/11 conspiracy theory "documentary?" A friend asked me to watch it, and it's making me so angry I can't say anything intelligible about it. We're going to be stuck forever with people denying this tragedy just like we're stuck with people denying the Holocaust.

It's all over google video. Just type in "Loose Change" if you hate your brain.

I have nothing against genuinely mentally handicapped kids (and would pummel someone that mocked them), but how frickin' RETARDED can someone be? It can't be a lie because he used the quote as proof that delphi didn't watch it. The kid truly doesn't understand basic English.
 
chipmunk,

The kid is also mentaly challenged. The quote he is referring to clearly states that the forum member WATCHED LC.

I have nothing against genuinely mentally handicapped kids (and would pummel someone that mocked them), but how frickin' RETARDED can someone be? It can't be a lie because he used the quote as proof that delphi didn't watch it. The kid truly doesn't understand basic English.
There's actually a bit more to it than that, a bit of history. But even then, Roxdog was falsely accusing delphi of dishonesty.

Delphi revealed that he had not watched the video through to the end before he wrote that post. In Roxdog's mind, this was equivalent to not having watched it at all. Of course, any reasonable person understands the idea that if you watch a movie half way through, you can tell by that point if it's crap, and state authoritatively what you think of it.

Roxdog didn't do himself any favors bringing it up out of context, though. Anyone unfamiliar with the history will have no idea why Roxdog would say that delphi hadn't watched it.
 
chipmunk,

The kid is just using it as an excuse to ignore criticism of the film.

"Sure you listed 50 gross errors, but what about the rest of the film?"

Heck, I watched a little over half of LC2 and couldn't stomach anymore of the self-contradicting content.

Whenever you make a good case for a theory being false, he switches to another one. I spent many months patiently going line by line in order to help him, but he responded with his asinine remarks. He is just trying to mooch off of the 'work' of other CTs in order to build a following for himself. He has the intellect of a child and the manners of a toddler. He has a history of being banned from 'free speech' and 'patriot' forums for similar behavior.

His behavior is actually an attempt to get you to respond in a similar manner. The moment you do, he will assume a professorial manner and complain about the lack of credible debate. This, of course, applies to most unhinged CTs.
 
He's not a CT'er, but his ability to articulate is poor, and his patience with reading detailed explanations is on par with a lot of the sheeple in the US.

For all that, I think his heart is in the right place. He works in New York, with the Fire Department.

DR


I believe Sentinel believes there were explosives set off in the towers. Whether that amounts to CD or not, I don't know. I also can't be sure if he thinks the government is involved or not.

He is more verbally involved in criticising the lack of respect CTers have re: ground zero, and the failures of the NY/Fed govt. to provide better equipment for FDNY, give support to recovery personnel who suffered health issues, etc.

I would call Sentinel a CTer, but not a Looser.

-Andrew
 
Whenever you make a good case for a theory being false, he switches to another one.
When CTs do this with me, as soon as they bring up another subject, I like to get confirmation that they are conceding the previous thing we were discussing.
 
* IronSnot : MIA, not answering questions
Apologies, looking for evidence most of the time, which is very time consuming. I do though post quite a bit on the guardian board, mostly but not exclusively about 9/11 (guardian.co.uk) and a little on nineeleven.co.uk and very occasionally on DU. (username - generarth).

When I have the proof I may post a little more.

:D
 
Thats because we were attempting a reverse "Matrix" on him. You know, we show him that the world really isn't about us being food for the NWO and the JOOS, and the NEOCONS, but rather it is just an ordinary world where people work everyday, and live, and exists, and occasionally bad things happen, and the CIA and FBI leave 99.99999% of the people in the world alone...when you tell him all this it is like..pulling him back up out of the rabbit hole...or making him spit up the red pill....

THEY DONT LIKE IT...THEY WANT TO KEEP BEING NEO...
 
Is anyone here familiar with the Portal of Evil? A huge collection of links to weird and 'evil' websites (woo sites frequently make an appearance at POE). Every link is given its own discussion board where POE readers can talk about the website. Occasionally, the owner of the featured website shows up on the discussion board to try and defend their fetish/beliefs/whatever.

On at least one occasion, a particularly crazed site owner showed up and began hurling insults, theats of law suits and strange, illogical justifications for her deviant behaviour. This is not very unusual at POE, but after several weeks of this incoherent insanity it became apparent that the individual was indeed mentally challenged and incapable of dealing with reality. Her inability to reason or comprehend people's posts meant that attempted discussion with her was essentially spam. Eventually the admin of Portal of Evil suggested that people stop wasting their time provoking this woman. The argument was no longer interesting or entertaining, it was just sad.

This is how I'm starting to feel about the discussions with Cristophera and TruthSeeker1234.
 

Back
Top Bottom