anglolawyer
Banned
What's she ever done to you?
Rolfe.
Nothing. So what?
What's she ever done to you?
Rolfe.
Fair enough. She's done plenty FOR me.
Rolfe.
It could have been anybody's voice. It just happened to be hers, that day. This is an incredibly silly derail. I like her, she's a grand person, but she's so far from the topic of this thread that she could be in another dimension.
Rolfe.
http://www.theguardian.com/commenti...-floods-somerset-levels-david-cameron-farmersGeorge Monbiot said:For a moment, that rarest of beasts – common sense – poked a nose out of its burrow and sniffed the air. Assailed by angry farmers demanding dredging in the Somerset Levels, the environment secretary, Owen Paterson, broke with time-honoured protocol and said something sensible: "Dredging is often not the best long-term or economic solution and increased dredging of rivers on the Somerset Levels would not have prevented the recent widespread flooding."
Clock is ticking. Japan managed to rebuild a road section destroyed by 2011's earthquake in 6 days.
We'll in that case it's funny that Chris 'Lord' Smith, chairman of the Environment Agency, has been panicked into promising to start dredging imminently. These guys are paid serious cash for a couple of afternoons a month. Don't they have to have some backbone when faced with the mob?
Not when the mob is tory voters who might switch to UKIP. In practice its largely irrelevant. the EA doesn't have the money for worthwhile dredging.
This becomes a problem when once in a century conditions start to recur ever 2-3 years.Expensive credging to benefit a handful of houses from once in a hundred years events. This is the power of TV and how it makes the politicos dance to its tune.
I'd condemn a line about 400 meters inland and relocate the network rail alignment.
Not when the mob is tory voters who might switch to UKIP. In practice its largely irrelevant. the EA doesn't have the money for worthwhile dredging.
Expensive credging to benefit a handful of houses from once in a hundred years events. This is the power of TV and how it makes the politicos dance to its tune.
This becomes a problem when once in a century conditions start to recur ever 2-3 years.
There is a real question to be asked here. Is it economically justifiable to keep dredging or does it make sense to move everyone out of the area? Coastal erosion and coastal flooding are realities that must be addressed and the answer may be to give up some territory.