Merged Core-led collapse and explosive demolition

[LSSBB]

Even under a Trolls bridge, dust bunnies form! Right?

And if you don't dust for a while, the dust layers get deeper and... compacted! Lord, how DOES that happen?

 

[Myriad]

In what universe does a mass of debris compact itself?

Obviously you've never seen the bottom of my laundry pile.

(Which is understandable; I rarely see it myself.)

Respectfully,
Myriad

 

[tfk]

Fabrication never ceases. In what universe does a mass of debris compact itself?

um, who said anything about "compacted itself"?

The snowball that I referenced didn't compact itself. I compacted it with my hands.

The avalanche didn't even "compact itself", although it came close. Gravity, an initiating failure & the inertia of moving, gradually compacting snow colliding with uncompacted, unmoving snow compacted the snow.

Now, let's see if we can think of any pertinent event in which there was:

1. gravity
2. an initiating failure
3. downward motion of originally uncompacted stuff
4. colliding with
5. unmoving, uncompacted stuff
resulting in
6. a whole bunch of compacted stuff.

Here's a couple of hints...

and

http://www.stevespak.com/fires/manhattan/layers.jpg

Edited by LashL: 

Removed hotlinked image and replaced with regular link. Please see Rule 5.

Any guesses, Clayton?

Buehler?

 

[atavisms]

Paint is not highly energetic when ignited and certainly does not leave elemental iron in it's wake.
We have samples of these chips which have only been partially ignited.. one part of it is red gray and the other is iron.
Even if they didnt exist, most people can look carefully at the video evidence and what remained of t the buildings and be sure explosives were involved. But they do exist and they are a thermitic material and they are just another of the 30 nails in the coffin of the official fairy tale. I almost never talk of them for this reason; they are irrelevant to being 100% sure those buildings were purposely blown up.

 

[Bell]

I almost never talk of them for this reason; they are irrelevant to being 100% sure those buildings were purposely blown up.

You should never talk of them for the reason that there is nothing to support the buildings were blown up.

 

[Oystein]

Paint is not highly energetic when ignited...

Can you quantify that?
How energetic is paint when ignited? And how do you know that?
How energetic is, in comparison, thermite?

 

[Robrob]

Paint is not highly energetic when ignited and certainly does not leave elemental iron in it's wake.

Neither does thermite. Your point?

We have samples of these chips which have only been partially ignited.. one part of it is red gray and the other is iron.

Sounds like a paint chip off an iron girder/rebar. Your point?

Even if they didnt exist, most people can look carefully at the video evidence and what remained of t the buildings and be sure explosives were involved.

Please feel free to explain how this collapse differed from any other natural collapse. Be sure to elaborate on what you would have expected to see on 9/11 but didn't.

But they do exist and they are a thermitic material

Feel free to elaborate why you think thermite can be/is used to demolish buildings.

almost never talk of them for this reason; they are irrelevant to being 100% sure those buildings were purposely blown up.

I suspect there's additional reasons you don't like to talk about them.

 

[beachnut]

Paint is not highly energetic when ignited and certainly does not leave elemental iron in it's wake.
We have samples of these chips which have only been partially ignited.. one part of it is red gray and the other is iron.
Even if they didnt exist, most people can look carefully at the video evidence and what remained of t the buildings and be sure explosives were involved. But they do exist and they are a thermitic material and they are just another of the 30 nails in the coffin of the official fairy tale. I almost never talk of them for this reason; they are irrelevant to being 100% sure those buildings were purposely blown up.

Paint is as energetic as the chips Jones claims are thermite. You forgot to do the chemistry.

http://911research.wtc7.net/

An Attempt to Uncover the Truth About September 11th, 2001

Your web site of woo, 11 years, the Attempt has failed.

 

[Dave Rogers]

Paint is not highly energetic when ignited

Wrong. Paint contains combustible substances with energy densities about an order of magnitude greater than thermite. Anecdotally, the US Navy is said to have embarked, immediately after the Pearl Harbor attack, on a program of paint scraping on all warchips, because the excessively thick paint resulting from painting everything repeatedly to keep the sailors busy in peacetime was found to be a fire hazard.

and certainly does not leave elemental iron in it's wake.

Neither do Jones and Harrit's samples. They leave compounds containing iron, but Jones and Harrit like to repeat the blatant lie that they are elemental iron.

Even if they didnt exist, most people can look carefully at the video evidence and what remained of t the buildings and be sure explosives were involved. But they do exist and they are a thermitic material and they are just another of the 30 nails in the coffin of the official fairy tale. I almost never talk of them for this reason; they are irrelevant to being 100% sure those buildings were purposely blown up.

You really haven't got the faintest glimmerings of a clue what you're talking about here. Thermite is not an explosive.

Dave

 

[atavisms]

You should never talk of them for the reason that there is nothing to support the buildings were blown up.

Look again:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JnZbYXcbqw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqbUkThGlCo&lr=1

http://smu.gs/L8pTCz

**There are many facts of features of these events that indicate the use of explosives.
Some people argue the world is flat and the holocaust didn't happen. If you are saying that because you really belive it fine. Have anice life. But if u'r saying it bc you havent heard it on the evening news. Then look at the facts and you will see you're wrong. That the fires could not have lasted for 100 days, that steel and iron could not have melted. That one of the twin tower hit near the roof could not convert itself to powder from the section above! It is designed to withstand many times its own weight. *Talking aboutt he north Tower here.
Trust me, I have looked at this issue extensively. I can tell from your words, you have not.

 

[Bell]

Look again:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JnZbYXcbqw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqbUkThGlCo&lr=1

http://smu.gs/L8pTCz

**There are many facts of features of these events that indicate the use of explosives.

There are none. Not a "boom", no flashes, no evidence of explosives found in the rubble, let alone the fact that it is impossible to wire three high-rise buildings with explosives without any of the occupants noticing. There is no hard evidence whatsoever, only what the gullible believe.

Some people argue the world is flat and the holocaust didn't happen.

Some people argue the World Trade Center was a controlled demolition. Same difference.

If you are saying that because you really belive it fine. Have anice life.

I don't have a nice life. But that has nothing to do with 9/11.

But if u'r saying it bc you havent heard it on the evening news. Then look at the facts and you will see you're wrong.

*What* facts?

That the fires could not have lasted for 100 days, that steel and iron could not have melted.

Steel and iron didn't melt.

That one of the twin tower hit near the roof could not convert itself to powder from the section above!

The towers did not convert themselves to powder. Where did you get this silly idea? There were tons of debris. Do you think *explosives* could turn the towers into powder?

It is designed to withstand many times its own weight. *Talking aboutt he north Tower here.

How much weight could 1 (one) floor hold? That is what was catching the falling parts of the towers.

Trust me, I have looked at this issue extensively. I can tell from your words, you have not.

I do believe you have looked at it extensively. I think you need to look even more, preferably *not* on truther websites.

 

[tfk]

Trust me, I have looked at this issue extensively.

And despite all this "extensive examination", you make one statement after another after another that is patently, completely wrong.

I little bit of competent examination trumps a boatload of incompetent examination every day of the week.

 

[ElMondoHummus]

I little bit of competent examination trumps a boatload of incompetent examination every day of the week.

Yes, this. I look at the weather extensively, but that doesn't make me a meteorologist.

Although on a day like today, I feel like pulling a truther and subbing my own opinion for theirs. Looking out the window right now, seeing storm clouds, having no umbrella... thanks weathermen!

 

[Robrob]

There are none. Not a "boom", no flashes, no evidence of explosives found in the rubble, let alone the fact that it is impossible to wire three high-rise buildings with explosives without any of the occupants noticing. There is no hard evidence whatsoever, only what the gullible believe.

Seriously, any "theory" that demands thousands of invisible CIA ninjas planting tons of highly unstable explosives, miles of det cord and electrical connections, top to bottom over 110 floors of office building running 24/7 - without anyone noticing a thing?

Steel and iron didn't melt.

No matter how many times they repeat the canard "steel melted" I have yet to hear one of them explain what they mean, provide documentation of such an event and how it indicates "CD."

The towers did not convert themselves to powder. Where did you get this silly idea? There were tons of debris. Do you think *explosives* could turn the towers into powder?

Another strange obsession of the CT. The WTC rubble field was 8-10 stories tall. Notwithstanding, what kind of CD are there that turn a building into "dust?"

How much weight could 1 (one) floor hold? That is what was catching the falling parts of the towers.

Physics 101. Strange how many CT don't grasp it.

I do believe you have looked at it extensively. I think you need to look even more, preferably *not* on truther websites.

If I had a nickel for every CT who told me they "studied" something, well, I'd have a lot of nickels...

 

[ergo]

1) thousands of invisible CIA ninjas planting
2) tons of highly unstable explosives,
3) miles of det cord and electrical connections, top to bottom
4) over 110 floors of office building running 24/7

I never cease to get a giggle out of this particular Belieber meme.

PS: you forgot the " !! !!1!! "

 

[NoahFence]

I never cease to get a giggle out of this particular Belieber meme.

PS: you forgot the " !! !!1!! "

yet you can't refute any of it. typical.

here's a question you're incapable of answering:

where do you think he got those numbers?

 

[Robrob]

I never cease to get a giggle out of this particular Belieber meme.

PS: you forgot the " !! !!1!! "

So you will be able to explain/refute any of it?

 

[brazenlilraisin]

I never cease to get a giggle out of this particular Belieber meme.

It is utterly nonsensical, isn't it? Considering the collapses were not preceded or accompanied by any sound resembling explosive charge(s)....

 

[Ape of Good Hope]

I never cease to get a giggle out of this particular Belieber meme.

Here's something that made EVERYONE giggle.

 

[thedopefishlives]

Here's something that made EVERYONE giggle.

Also this.