Merged Core-led collapse and explosive demolition

ergo said:
I can think of two reasons why bedunkers are often so loathe to explain their theories using plain, concise language--words even. 1) They are not sure what they are saying and need to respond in a way that doesn't betray this, and/or 2) when they do say something, they are not sure that they're right and want to make their answer vague enough that they can wriggle out of it if need be.

Your images show the towers still standing after being hit by planes. Are you making the point that the plane impacts alone did not cause them to collapse?
Click to expand...

I can't tell if you're an idiot on purpose or not.....
 
GStan said:
He was answering your question asking could the towers have collapsed with just a few strategically placed bombs on 2 or 3 consecutive upper floors? If not, why not?

Since the collapse started on the exact floors where the planes crashed AND the exact floors where the fires raged for an hour, NO, any explosives that had been previously put in those locations would no longer be operable.
Click to expand...

The question wasn't whether strategically placed plane crashes could bring the towers down, but whether strategically placed explosives, sans plane crashes, could. Either bedunkers can't ponder hypotheticals, or you're being disingenuous. Either way, Noah still hasn't answered the question.
 
ergo maybe you should defer to some explosives or demolition experts on the question of whether strategically-placed bombs alone could have collapsed the WTC buildings if you don't trust anybody's answers here.

Unless you fancy yourself some kind of expert on the subject, there's no harm in looking up a few demolition companies and asking the real experts what they think. There's big, shiny world outside of internet discussion forums, ergo.

In that big world, the fact is that planes DID hit the buildings and fires raged, and the collapses started at the impact points, which precludes explosives; discussing CD is just mental gymnastics
 
Last edited:
ozeco41 said:
I am still amused that truthers are so ignorant of how explosives work that they can claim "Hush-a-BoomTM"
:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Interesting, because we still haven't been able to determine here whether a few explosives placed along the inner core of a half-kilometre tall building which is furnished and occupied would really sound like the detonation charges you hear in shorter, emptied-out buildings, or if they would sound like the explosions that people heard.
 
ergo said:
Interesting, because we still haven't been able to determine here whether a few explosives placed along the inner core of a half-kilometre tall building which is furnished and occupied would really sound like the detonation charges you hear in shorter, emptied-out buildings, or if they would sound like the explosions that people heard.
Click to expand...

The explosions that people heard are irrelevant unless they occurred in rapid succession just before the buildings collapsed.

ETA: Oh, and unless ANY EVIDENCE for explosives have been found.

Your logic seems to be:

P1: Controlled demolitions are accompanied by explosions
P2: Explosions were heard at the WTC
C: Therefore, there were controlled demolitions at the WTC

This is like saying:

P1: The Rolling Stones play loud guitar music
P2: There is loud guitar music coming from my brother's room
C: Therefore, the Rolling Stones are in my brother's room
 
ergo said:
Interesting, because we still haven't been able to determine here whether a few explosives placed along the inner core of a half-kilometre tall building which is furnished and occupied would really sound like the detonation charges you hear in shorter, emptied-out buildings, or if they would sound like the explosions that people heard.
Click to expand...
Is this with no planes?
 
ergo said:
Interesting, because we still haven't been able to determine here whether a few explosives placed along the inner core of a half-kilometre tall building which is furnished and occupied would really sound like the detonation charges you hear in shorter, emptied-out buildings, or if they would sound like the explosions that people heard.
Click to expand...
No blast effects found on 911, your delusion remains, failed and evidence free. How is your moon size rubble nonsense coming?
 
Last edited:
ergo said:
Interesting, because we still haven't been able to determine here whether a few explosives placed along the inner core of a half-kilometre tall building which is furnished and occupied would really sound like the detonation charges you hear in shorter, emptied-out buildings, or if they would sound like the explosions that people heard.
Click to expand...

Pointless speculation. No seismic signature means no explosives. :rolleyes:
 
ergo said:
The question wasn't whether strategically placed plane crashes could bring the towers down, but whether strategically placed explosives, sans plane crashes, could. Either bedunkers can't ponder hypotheticals, or you're being disingenuous. Either way, Noah still hasn't answered the question.
Click to expand...

Strategically placed explosives can do pretty much anything except my laundry. What's your point?

There's zero need for hypotheticals when it comes to 9/11 and the WTC. What happened, happened. We don't need hypotheticals when we can just defer to the facts.
 
ergo said:
Interesting, because we still haven't been able to determine here whether a few explosives placed along the inner core of a half-kilometre tall building which is furnished and occupied would really sound like the detonation charges you hear in shorter, emptied-out buildings, or if they would sound like the explosions that people heard.
Click to expand...

What we have determined is that your premise is ridiculous and your argument is going nowhere. Why not try something new?
 
If only there was any evidence of strategically-placed explosives...then there'd be a point in this thread somewhere
 
ergo said:
Interesting, because we still haven't been able to determine here whether a few explosives placed along the inner core of a half-kilometre tall building which is furnished and occupied would really sound like the detonation charges you hear in shorter, emptied-out buildings, or if they would sound like the explosions that people heard.
Click to expand...
If you want an honest answer to your OP you need to give a base-line of existing conditions. I don't think you're a "no-planer" so can we assume the plane damage was done and the buildings were on fire.

It would be helpful if you answered with more than a "yes". Why don't you be honest and speculate as to how much explosives would be needed and state your reasons for this belief.

Let's start here and see if we can get through your question. You ignoring this will obviously show you have no interest in the OP.


You're up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom