I think a big part of the learning barrier here is the 9/11 bedunker dogma that "no explosions were heard" - by anyone. They're so convinced of this that it really zips up the argument very conveniently for them. They're literally blind and deaf to the presentation of extensive testimonial from the building workers, especially the ones who were in the basement at the time, and that of inside survivors, and outside witnesses, including firefighters. Yes, we know that bodies hitting cement and glass made explosive sounds. Bedunkers like to point out the few testimonies (I think you can count them on one hand) that make this comparison. In doing so, they have already debunked themselves, in that explosive sounds were indeed heard. People inside the building however, on the sub levels and higher floors would not be hearing the bodies hitting. They heard something else. There is extensive video evidence of news footage at the time describing explosions, of firefighters describing explosions. People thought there were bombs in the buildings. Many testimonials compared the sound to that of the 1993 bombing. Was everyone deafened in the 1993 bombing?
Explosions were heard, and felt. To say there is "no evidence" of them is simply lying, and an absurd kind of lying since the evidence and testimonial is abundant and readily found.
