• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Chemtrails?

Came across this at the US patent office

Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-...50&s1=5003186.PN.&OS=PN/5003186&RS=PN/5003186

3222675 December 1965 Schwartz
4755673 July 1988 Pollack et al.
Primary Examiner: Berman; Jack I.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sales; Michael W. Denson-Low; Wanda

One proposed solution to the problem of global warming involves the seeding of the atmosphere with metallic particles. One technique proposed to seed the metallic particles was to add the tiny particles to the fuel of jet airliners, so that the particles would be emitted from the jet engine exhaust while the airliner was at its cruising altitude. While this method would increase the reflection of visible light incident from space, the metallic particles would trap the long wavelength blackbody radiation released from the earth. This could result in net increase in global warming.
Click to expand...

Now a question - does anyone know what would happen if tiny metal particles were put into jet fuel? That idea sounds rather silly, couldnt it damage the engines?
 
Last edited:
Not only that, they want you to drive through them in a convertible.

They've revealed their weakness, people. Make sure you have a hard top. Or foil.

Lots and lots of foil.
 
therival58 said:
Now a question - does anyone know what would happen if tiny metal particles were put into jet fuel? That idea sounds rather silly, couldnt it damage the engines?
Click to expand...

Well, think about it. Would you like to try it on your car?

Hans
 
MRC_Hans said:
So, "The Lord of the Rings", or "Moby Dick" must also be true?

Hans
Click to expand...

I assumed my previous posts in the thread would enable me to skip the sarcasm tags. I was wrong.
 
Last edited:
MRC_Hans said:
You can't escape sarcasm when you deserve it.

Hans
Click to expand...

:confused:

I think there has been a communication breakdown here, it was my fault.

When I made the following post:
deeper said:
I assumed my previous posts in the thread would enable me to skip the sarcasm tags. I was wrong.
Click to expand...

I was implying that when I had typed:
deeper said:
How could he know all that if he wasn't telling the truth (or didn't exist)?
Click to expand...

I hadn't communicated my sarcasm effectively and my post should have looked like the following, considering the article I was referring to was very unlike what I would imagine insider knowledge would look like:
deeper said:
How could he possibly know all that if he wasn't telling the truth (or didn't exist)? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I hope that clears things up. :)
 
Last edited:
deeper said:
:confused:

I think there has been a communication breakdown here, it was my fault.

When I made the following post:


I was implying that when I had typed:


I hadn't communicated my sarcasm effectively and my post should have looked like the following, considering the article I was referring to was very unlike what I would imagine insider knowledge would look like:


I hope that clears things up. :)
Click to expand...
Ahh, I see. Sorry, then. :p

Hans
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom