• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cestui que vie act of 1666

gtm said:
Yozhik, chief O'Collins 'cheerleader' on the Icke forum has articulated the vicious racism that is at the very heart of UCADIA thinking.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1059681490&postcount=326

Seriously unpleasant stuff. Bring back Rob Menard. OK, he a cheap conman but is really quite inoffensive compared to this kind of crazy bigotry.
Click to expand...
Agreed. All this crap about "bloodlines" (O'Collins=good, Crypto-jews=bad) is really offensive. For all his antics, I seriously doubt Menard would buy into this kind of racist drivel.

I can't believe I just said something nice about Menard. I need a drink.
 
D'rok said:
Agreed. All this crap about "bloodlines" (O'Collins=good, Crypto-jews=bad) is really offensive. For all his antics, I seriously doubt Menard would buy into this kind of racist drivel.

I can't believe I just said something nice about Menard. I need a drink.
Click to expand...


Maybe, but I have noticed that a very high percentage of the FOTLers seems to have "issues" with Jews and "non whites" in general.
 
tsig said:
Canon 1
A law is not a canon, but a false or lesser positive law unless it follows this law and belongs to the body of laws known as Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum in accordance with Pactum De Singularis Caelum.

I wonder if he had fun making all this up.
Click to expand...

Protego Horribilis!

I wonder if he's tried Harry Potter spells in the courtroom.
 
Someone has slated Ucadia and the galant yozhik comes to the rescue.
This is almost a stundie
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1059683376&postcount=333
You think it's a 'crock'?
Excellent - everyone is entitled to an opinion.
Now ... WHY is it a 'crock'?
Rebut it ... give your rationale ... deconstruct it point for point.
Substantiate the 'crock' label ... provide some 'flesh' to the 'bones' you're throwing.

It may well be a 'crock' ... but you give nothing as to WHY it is a 'crock'.
Hardly compelling or credible rhetoric.
Click to expand...
He actually wants someone to rebut Ucadia using reason and logic. :D
 
Back to the caves.

jargon buster said:
Someone has slated Ucadia and the galant yozhik comes to the rescue.
This is almost a stundie
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1059683376&postcount=333

He actually wants someone to rebut Ucadia using reason and logic. :D
Click to expand...

Yosick has certainly found himself a new guru.

We are where we are now because we have forgotten who we are.
Through generations, we have lost our customs, our traditions and our values.
The building blocks of the clann, tribe and community have been eroded systematically and intentionally ... and we and our ancestors not only watched it happen, on many occasions we invited it to happen.
 
How long can Rumpole last being the voice of reason there.

CQV 1666

It does what it says on the tin - ie allows the heirs of disappeared persons to administer their estates. FOC's interpretation is wholly misguided. It's a English Act of Parliament & by 1666 the reformation had totally eradicated 'Papal' power in mainland Britain. The idea that CQV 1666 is part of some nefarious plot involving the jesuits, khazars, venetians, reverse vampires, skull & bones etc is tosh.
 
tsig said:
How long can Rumpole last being the voice of reason there.

CQV 1666

It does what it says on the tin - ie allows the heirs of disappeared persons to administer their estates. FOC's interpretation is wholly misguided. It's a English Act of Parliament & by 1666 the reformation had totally eradicated 'Papal' power in mainland Britain. The idea that CQV 1666 is part of some nefarious plot involving the jesuits, khazars, venetians, reverse vampires, skull & bones etc is tosh.
Click to expand...
Not long I suppose, now that Yozhik has unveiled the depth of his racism and holocaust denial.

anti-semitic ******* said:
Of course the Holocaust happened ... exactly as the Zionists and Parasites planned it so. The numbers might be a little out ...
rolleyes.gif
... but there is a reason for that too.

Without it, their Covenant would not have [prematurely and falsely] come to an end.

The Zionists and other Parasites NEEDED the Holocaust ... the Zionists and other Parasites PLANNED the Holocaust ... the Zionists and other Parasites EXECUTED the Holocaust ... it was a well executed plan with a purpose.
Click to expand...
 
D'rok said:
Not long I suppose, now that Yozhik has unveiled the depth of his racism and holocaust denial.
Click to expand...

It's utterly obscene.

The Jews 'holocausted' themselves but it doesn't really matter because the majority of the ones who were murdered were Khazar 'parasites'.

I used to think Yozhik was a harmless nut but he appears to have had his mind warped by the vile O'Collins.

For the record I'm done with posting on Icke. I've done it for nearly a year now & enough is enough.
 
gtm said:
It's utterly obscene.

The Jews 'holocausted' themselves but it doesn't really matter because the majority of the ones who were murdered were Khazar 'parasites'.

I used to think Yozhik was a harmless nut but he appears to have had his mind warped by the vile O'Collins.

For the record I'm done with posting on Icke. I've done it for nearly a year now & enough is enough.
Click to expand...

He is an idiot. But like all idiots with guns, he ends up turning it on himself. Here's a good example -

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=157833&page=2

There's even a stundie at post 38

I totally agree that the section of that Ucadia thread that you object to is positively offensive.
 
Last edited:
Frank goes there!!! - UCADIA & Admiralty law

It's amusing that the same old guff is continually recycled by legal / constitutional conspiracy theorists.

Herewith UCADIA chief wizard, Frank O'Collins, articulating the old chesnut vis a vis the law actually being 'evil' admiralty 'magical' spells:

http://blog.ucadia.com/2012/11/the-organized-psuedo-legal-commercial.html


The laughable thing about this is that O'Collins is poaching hackneyed old ideas first propogated by the early 1980's Sovereign Citizens.
 
It had to happen. O'Collins is as nutty as a fruit cake. No wonder yozhik is an avid follower.

This is my favourite bit. :D

Again the pirates and privateers are openly and knowingly lying to the people they claim to uphold as the proof and method of how admiralty law is applied to each and every one of us- is breathtakingly simple and obvious- (1) we each require a birth certificate and registration and (2) we are birthed in hospitals that literally means a military establishment and legally is treated itself as a "vessel"- with hospitals both "commissioned" and "launched" and with people formally "admitted" "onboard" and discharged.
Click to expand...
 
Disclaimer: Badly formatted text follows.

Stacey Grove said:
It had to happen. O'Collins is as nutty as a fruit cake. No wonder yozhik is an avid follower.

This is my favourite bit. :D ....
Click to expand...

Again the pirates and privateers are openly and knowingly lying to the people they claim to uphold as the proof and method of how admiralty law is applied to each and every one of us- is breathtakingly simple and obvious- (1) we each require a birth certificate and registration and (2) we are birthed in hospitals that literally means a military establishment and legally is treated itself as a "vessel"- with hospitals both "commissioned" and "launched" and with people formally "admitted" "onboard" and discharged.
Click to expand...

Seriously, its like a big merry-go-round.
One bunch of numpties fall for it, grows up, forgets about it and then the next platoon of numpties fall for this nonsense.

Gurus and really bad creators of CT websites need to realise that fooling the gullible and illiterate is not something to be proud of.
Hardly makes you "a wolverine" :D

(I'd address that at you Menard, Hi btw, but tbh you're even more numptier than your marks!).

So, to follow on, here follows my first post, (as a dimwit who believes conmen on YouTube), which I would post on Rob's 3-member WFS or over at the DIF FOTL-Waffle Thread, a mecca for free speech of course, ...if I were allowed to.


Ahem....
---

Use iz all sheepz.
I canz prove it. Surch CumfiSlpaz on Utoob.
He haz the truth and can proof it.

Did YOU KNOW?
If yu has 2 arms then you r a victim of tirany?

Luk it up!!!!!!!!


arm
2 [ahrm] Show IPA

noun
1.
Usually, arms. weapons, especially firearms.

2.
arms, Heraldry. the escutcheon, with its divisions, charges, and tinctures, and the other components forming an achievement that symbolizes and is reserved for a person, family, or corporate body; armorial bearings; coat of arms.

verb (used without object)
3.
to enter into a state of hostility or of readiness for war.

verb (used with object)
4.
to equip with weapons: to arm the troops.

5.
to activate (a fuze) so that it will explode the charge at the time desired.

6.
to cover protectively.

7.
to provide with whatever will add strength, force, or security; support; fortify: He was armed with statistics and facts.

8.
to equip or prepare for any specific purpose or effective use: to arm a security system; to arm oneself with persuasive arguments.

If u kant c it u r blind. itz all theyre in frunt ov u.
Do yoor doo dilgenss.
Im not doing yior werki for yew.
The pTb are wonting to remove our armz!
Here is a random link toa Alix Jonz video to proof it.

Wayke up sheepul!
 
Last edited:
Stacey Grove said:
It had to happen. O'Collins is as nutty as a fruit cake. No wonder yozhik is an avid follower.

This is my favourite bit. :D
Click to expand...

we are birthed in hospitals that literally means a military establishment and legally is treated itself as a "vessel"- with hospitals both "commissioned" and "launched" and with people formally "admitted" "onboard" and discharged.

This is ultra crazy. What O'Collins has failed to pick up on is that giving birth is hospital is a relatively recent innovation which is predated by the requirement to have a birth certificate. Kinda renders that limb of his argument void.

UCADIA is wonderfully dotty.

I have to confess there is a small part of me that admires O'Collins chutzpah. He has after all sat down and written a whole law code. It must have taken him ages. He's even included a law that deals with the killing of an Alien :eek:. The UCADIA websites are a monument to one mans mountainous arrogance & delusion.

That being said the anti semitism & anti catholicism are pretty unpleasant.
 
Last edited:
we are birthed in hospitals that literally means a military establishment and legally is treated itself as a "vessel"- with hospitals both "commissioned" and "launched" and with people formally "admitted" "onboard" and discharged.
Click to expand...


And I always thought that a Hospital was a big building with patients. But that's not important right now.

Norm
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom