• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Can Mirror effect?

Kumar

Unregistered
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
14,259
Hello all,

In accordance with the discussions held in 'Can photograph effect' topic I want to know:-

Can looking into the mirror under light effect scientifically?


Reflection from mirror will be somewhat like 'reflection of same photons/energy/wavelengths/colours' as we possess in person.

So pls comment & tell accordingly.

Best wishes.
 
Spooky! This is the place for you, Kumar!

peaugres_mirror_maze1.jpg
 
Are all these you mentioned, scientific?

flume,

By effect I mean on all our body by energies-atoms/molecule/cells interactions.
 
Can wavelengths come out of a mirror and attack me? How about colors?
 
Zep said:
[OK, I'll bite...]

Kumar, what do YOU mean by "scientific"?

That is really a biting question. I will think & reply bit later.

I assume 'this topic may not progress well & I may have to drop it soon'.:(
 
Kumar, I'm not trying to be mean, but your post makes absolutely no sense. You need to elaborate, otherwise people won't be able to give any answers.
 
plindboe said:
Kumar, I'm not trying to be mean, but your post makes absolutely no sense. You need to elaborate, otherwise people won't be able to give any answers.
Peter, you ask the impossible. The problem is that Kumar cannot make sense to anyone because he does not know how to or even what "sensible" is. He is either a troll extraordinaire, or one crazy mixed up four-year-old.
 
plindboe said:
Kumar, I'm not trying to be mean, but your post makes absolutely no sense. You need to elaborate, otherwise people won't be able to give any answers.

zep, peter,

You are right. By scientific, my intention here to know in 'exact science a science (as physics, chemistry, or astronomy) whose laws are capable of accurate quantitative expression esp.physics & chemistry.
 
Stop messing about with mirrors, Kumar. Those things are so Bronze Age.

Get yourself an optical phase conjugator and party!
 
Kumar, your question will not be answered because it is based on a false premise: That a light spectrum has any particular effect on our bodies, except for perception.

There is no basis for assuming it has (the colors of your surroundings do not generally affect your body functions), so your questions do not make sense.


Hans
 
MRC_Hans said:
Kumar, your question will not be answered because it is based on a false premise: That a light spectrum has any particular effect on our bodies, except for perception.

There is no basis for assuming it has (the colors of your surroundings do not generally affect your body functions), so your questions do not make sense.


Hans

Location: 55 47.62N 12 30.34E

Kobenjaven?
 
This thread reminds me of Flann O’Brien’s novel, The Third Policeman , one of the funniest novels I’ve ever read. In it we are introduced to the Irish philosopher and savant, De Selby. Amongst other things, De Selby had rejected planetary movement as the cause of night and day and proposed that night was due to volcanic accretions of black air and that sleep was merely a series of fainting fits due to inhalation of the insanitary black air.

Anyway, De Selby described an experiment with a mirror. Since, he reasoned, light had a finite speed and a definite time of travel, the image one observed of oneself in a mirror was an image of an infinitesimally younger person. He examined then a reflection in a mirror, reflected in another mirror, to see a series of reflections, each image infinitesimally younger than the one before. By means of a powerful telescope, he claimed that he had observed the end image in the series, a boy 12 years old of remarkable beauty and intelligence (himself of course). He further claimed that he had been prevented from observing the images back to the cradle because of the curvature of the earth.
 
Kumar's tour of scientific insanity reminded me of something I came across a couple of years ago: a barking mad advocate of an idea that blood is circulated by gravity and that the nails are the main method for excreting toxins from the body. I've had a quick play on Google and can't find the relevant web pages any more. Has anyone else come across this?
 
I never heard that one. But I've heard of Arnold Ehret, the person who wrote a book on the mucus-less diet, still popular with some raw foodists. (I think by mucus he may have meant protein, which seems like a poor idea for a diet to me, but I haven't read the book.) He had the idea that air pressure expanded the lungs, and then the stretched lung squeezed it back out like a balloon. So breathing happened automatically. And this breathing also pumped the blood; the heart was only a valve.

Another guy was the founder of the Waldorf school and Anthroposophy. Rudolph Steiner. He also thought the heart was only a passive conduit, but i think he believed that the blood moved itself, through vortexes in the liquid.
 

Back
Top Bottom