No way is that baby two months old. Look at its long legs.
5 foot 9 isn't that tall.
No way is that baby two months old. Look at its long legs.
5 foot 9 isn't that tall.
This comment, presumably, is based on your medical/ biological qualifications rather than the usual tired mantra of conspiracy theorists that 'it doesn't look right to me', yes?
I don’t think he is even that tall. He sat next to me at the start of the road cycling event at the 2012 Olympics, and I had at least 3 inches over him. I’m not quite 6 foot.
My daughter was top 1% in length and top 2% in weight at birth, so was a really big baby (she has since regressed to the mean). Those are global figures, so in Asia she was a mega baby. We got a lot of people telling us she ‘can’t be’ three months old - er, she is. We were there.
On a related note, a lot of people are pointing out that the dog in his current photo op doesn't quite look like the one he adopted.
Next they’ll be saying the woman in the photos isn’t even the woman he is married to.
One of the oddest conspiracy theories I have seen, this week people have been speculating that the British Prime Minister either lied about when his (probably) most recent baby was born, lied about when his baby was conceived, or even went as far as to borrow a baby to use in this photo op:
Meghan Markle had similar treatment during and after her preganncy ,again with crazy Twitter idiots.
Sorry, but you're just very wrong here. The only way the religious right would abandon Trump en masse is if he participated in the abortion of his out-of-wedlock fetus. Fathering a child is just one of the things that can happen as a result of sex, and the religious right has already, in essence, pardoned Trump for his serial adultery.