• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Boris borrows a baby

gypsyjackson

Master Poster
gypsyjackson
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
2,495
Location
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
One of the oddest conspiracy theories I have seen, this week people have been speculating that the British Prime Minister either lied about when his (probably) most recent baby was born, lied about when his baby was conceived, or even went as far as to borrow a baby to use in this photo op:



Apparently the young lad is too big, or has too much hair, or couldn’t have been born in April. He might also be a vampire, because in the Zoom chat pictured, he seems to have vanished from the shot (or it’s at an angle and on a blurred screen).

Also the PM’s girlfriend has different sleeves in the Zoom shot, or summat. Therefore all fake. Or some fake to disguise the real stuff getting through.

I’m not entirely sure why people think he’s lying about anything to do with this, though some said it’s because the couple didn’t want to announce the pregnancy because it might have damaged Johnson’s chances in the Tory leadership election. Ha!

Full craziness on Twitter, eg: https://twitter.com/fascinatorfun/status/1284605617823506435
 
Trebuchet said:
I'm just trying to imagine the reaction in the USA if a President openly fathered a child out of wedlock!
Click to expand...

Blatantly lying, using the position to line your own pocket, banging porn stars, infidelity, stealing from charities. Supporting neo-nazis. Having a child out of wedlock is the bridge too far?
 
RolandRat said:
Blatantly lying, using the position to line your own pocket, banging porn stars, infidelity, stealing from charities. Supporting neo-nazis. Having a child out of wedlock is the bridge too far?
Click to expand...

Yes. Seriously, yes. The religious right would go ballistic. Unless it was Trump, in which case they'd just blame the slut.
 
gypsyjackson said:
One of the oddest conspiracy theories I have seen, this week people have been speculating that the British Prime Minister either lied about when his (probably) most recent baby was born, lied about when his baby was conceived, or even went as far as to borrow a baby to use in this photo op:

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_670705f185e43b139f.jpg[/qimg]

Apparently the young lad is too big, or has too much hair, or couldn’t have been born in April. He might also be a vampire, because in the Zoom chat pictured, he seems to have vanished from the shot (or it’s at an angle and on a blurred screen).

Also the PM’s girlfriend has different sleeves in the Zoom shot, or summat. Therefore all fake. Or some fake to disguise the real stuff getting through.

I’m not entirely sure why people think he’s lying about anything to do with this, though some said it’s because the couple didn’t want to announce the pregnancy because it might have damaged Johnson’s chances in the Tory leadership election. Ha!

Full craziness on Twitter, eg: https://twitter.com/fascinatorfun/status/1284605617823506435
Click to expand...

Which baby are you talking about in that photo?
 
gypsyjackson said:
At least one of the commentators did note his ‘badly fitting suit’, presumably on the basis that if it were really his child, he would have had it tailored.
Click to expand...

Have they not been paying attention to Johnson's whole "Boris" schtick? He's always worn ill-fitting suits, seemingly deliberately to support the bumbling buffoon image, in direct contrast to the likes of Blair, Cameron, even Rishi Sunak, who always give/gave good suit.
 
Trebuchet said:
I'm just trying to imagine the reaction in the USA if a President openly fathered a child out of wedlock!
Click to expand...

He did, he only had the trio with his wife Ivanka, the other two were with other women.


After all the evangelists of course don't recognise divorce do they?
 
Trebuchet said:
Yes. Seriously, yes. The religious right would go ballistic. Unless it was Trump, in which case they'd just blame the slut.
Click to expand...
Sorry, but you're just very wrong here. The only way the religious right would abandon Trump en masse is if he participated in the abortion of his out-of-wedlock fetus. Fathering a child is just one of the things that can happen as a result of sex, and the religious right has already, in essence, pardoned Trump for his serial adultery.
 
The religious right would find a way to justify even that. The religious reich has invested itself so deeply in the Trump debacle they simply can't pull out now without admitting that 3 years of sycophantic devotion were wasted. There would be some lip service made to "oh the terrible choices that weigh so heavily on a great leader's brow" and a few useful idiots spouting nonsense about a liberal honey trap or socialist plot to discredit dear leader. He could abort a fetus in the middle of Times Square while shouting "Death to America! And Jesus!" and his lapdogs would find a way to support him.
 
Yalius said:
The religious right would find a way to justify even that. The religious reich has invested itself so deeply in the Trump debacle they simply can't pull out now without admitting that 3 years of sycophantic devotion were wasted. There would be some lip service made to "oh the terrible choices that weigh so heavily on a great leader's brow" and a few useful idiots spouting nonsense about a liberal honey trap or socialist plot to discredit dear leader. He could abort a fetus in the middle of Times Square while shouting "Death to America! And Jesus!" and his lapdogs would find a way to support him.
Click to expand...

Obviously.. It was all instrumented by SATAN and the Liberals.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom