• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Bitcoin - Part 3

Not high levels of variability. High levels of unpredictability. Which certainly applies to bitcoin.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/variability.asp


Variability, almost by definition, is the extent to which data points in a statistical distribution or data set diverge—vary—from the average value, as well as the extent to which these data points differ from each other.

Professional investors perceive the risk of an asset class to be directly proportional to the variability of its returns.
 
The same principle applies to crypto currencies. It is of critical importance whether the crypto is being maintained by a person or by a system that renders the records immutable. (See OneCoin above).

That may be important to someone planning to use said currency. It would be of no importance to someone who isn't planning on using it, with the possible exception of someone with a loved one thinking of investing.

That's exactly what you are saying.

No. Your bias is altering your perception.

You say "trivial importance" because you want everybody to believe that bitcoin is as bad as a ponzi scheme. If they believe that it is a ponzi scheme then that is even better for you.

I am much better informed on what I want than you are. One could even say I am the world's foremost authority.

You incorrectly perceive me as wanting to smear Bitcoin when the reality is I only said it is of trivial importance if someone who doesn't like it and will never use it understands that it is not a specific type of scam.
 
You incorrectly perceive me as wanting to smear Bitcoin when the reality is I only said it is of trivial importance if someone who doesn't like it and will never use it understands that it is not a specific type of scam.
It is very telling that you didn't use the words "not a scam". It shows that you still want the lie that bitcoin is a scam to persist. You are not fooling anybody. You care very much that false information must be put out about bitcoin.
 
It is very telling that you didn't use the words "not a scam". It shows that you still want the lie that bitcoin is a scam to persist. You are not fooling anybody. You care very much that false information must be put out about bitcoin.

You're claiming to have revealed my secret agenda?

Whatever.
 
You're claiming to have revealed my secret agenda?

Whatever.
Ordinarily a critical thinker would want the correct explanation but you have been arguing yourself blue in the face that in the case of bitcoin, the truth doesn't matter.

If that doesn't reek of an agenda then I don't know what does.
 
Ordinarily a critical thinker would want the correct explanation but you have been arguing yourself blue in the face that in the case of bitcoin, the truth doesn't matter.

Then you've been misunderstanding my argument.

I'm essentially saying it's not necessary for everyone to have the same level of understanding on any topic, not just Bitcoin.

For someone who is thinking about being an investor, or who is promoting it as an investment to others, then absolutely they should understand it well enough to distinguish it's characteristics from any number of scams. They should also be held to being truthful in making claims regarding Bitcoin.

But for the vast majority of people who will not be investing in Bitcoin for any reason? What difference does it make what their understanding is?

If that doesn't reek of an agenda then I don't know what does.

And this is the real issue, you are attributing any disagreement with you to some "agenda". Bitcoin isn't a group of people targeted by a common bigotry, it's an abstraction created by computers working a mathematical formula. It doesn't have feelings to be hurt nor suffer from marginalization.
 
On the contrary. It is very relevant - to you.

Why? Because "bitcoin is risky" doesn't sound bad enough for you. OTOH allow people to think that it is a scam then suddenly it becomes a new ball game. So **** the facts!

I see now that your reflexive defense of BTC has gotten so bad that not only must you attack me even when I agree with you, you must lie about my motivations.

If you must know -- and if you bothered to check -- I initially thought BTC was a scam but decided that, although it's still possible, it probably wasn't. Now my only problem with it, aside from its use by criminals, is that it is, in your own words, risky. In fact that's the only thing I've been arguing with you over. So that you pretend that it isn't is downright dishonest, since you know that what you said above is not true.

Which certainly supports my earlier evaluation of your own motivations here.
 
But for the vast majority of people who will not be investing in Bitcoin for any reason? What difference does it make what their understanding is?
As I have said repeatedly, there is a huge difference between an investment that is inherently risky and a scam run by a shonky operator.

Why are you so determined that nobody know the difference?
 
As long as there's a possibility to make value out of it, who cares?
Apparently, quite a few people on this thread.

All scams die sooner or later and anybody who is still invested in them loses the lot. OTOH there is no indication that bitcoin has an expiry date.

So guess which word is bandied about the most in this thread (hint: "scam").
 
As I have said repeatedly, there is a huge difference between an investment that is inherently risky and a scam run by a shonky operator.

Why are you so determined that nobody know the difference?

Please go back to post #327 and read the rest of the post. That should be more than sufficient to explain that which you do not understand.
 
Please go back to post #327 and read the rest of the post. That should be more than sufficient to explain that which you do not understand.
The rest of the post doesn't explain anything.

Just answer this question: Do you believe that bitcoin is a scam or not?
 
It would if you read it and wanted to understand. If you don't, then there is not much I can do to force understanding on you.



In and of itself, no.
There is no understanding you.

You originally posted that bitcoin didn't fit the definition of a ponzi scheme. You could have added that it was still a bad investment. You could have even added some hyperbole if you wished.

Yet, incredibly, for some unfathomable reason you added "Although it's not a big deal using the word incorrectly". Unbelievable!

And when I questioned you about it, you actually doubled down on this ridiculous argument. You labeled anybody who takes you to task on this a "pendant". You have been screaming blue murder for 2 pages now that uncritical thinking about bitcoin is of "trivial importance".

It's no wonder that I find your motives suspect.
 
Because, for whatever reason, you decline to read/pay attention to the parts where I explain it quite well.
No you don't. You just say the truth doesn't matter.

Actually, it is a wonder. Why are you so emotionally invested in Bitcoin?
I am only interested in the truth. Of course you will call that "emotionally invested in Bitcoin" because you don't want the truth to be known.
 
Last edited:
The smart idiot greedy money just shorted bitcoin at 7223 again.

6400 next stop
Valley of death, John Bunyan.

Pilgrims progress, I should not elevate Bitcrap to something worth allegory.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom