gnome
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2001
- Messages
- 14,862
People who got in early were just lucky.
Aside from the creators and anyone who was let in on it before it became well known.
People who got in early were just lucky.
Angry guy is reminded of all the money of his that's stuck in bitcoin forever.
. But that is what buyers want - a currency that can't be printed into oblivion.
Even ignoring 51% attack type issues....
If they want a deflationary currency, well, they aren't particularly bright.
It's sort of wild watching these cats obsess about Weimar Germany and Zimbabwe and so on where external forces caused inflationary collapse and ignore centuries of human history reflecting how not having control over the volume of currency led to vicious boom and bust cycles.
How in the big picture having control over the currency has prevented way, way more damage than it has ever caused. Even in cases of inflationary collapse it would have been no better if inflation wasn't an option.
Gold has remained steady as stocks and bitcoin have plunged. Here’s where it could go next
Aside from the creators and anyone who was let in on it before it became well known.
Who said it was a conspiracy theory? Bitcoin maxis are quite open about their intentions and goals. They want to own this currency that will dominate the world financial markets, and if I don't buy in, I can "have fun staying poor."Why does it always have to be some sort of "evil" conspiracy theory?
I can't remember this year's figures, but last year 0.01% of wallet addresses held around 60% of all Bitcoins in circulation. I am skeptical that this is due to luck.People who got in early were just lucky. At the time, you couldn't sell 10,000 BTC for $50. The prospect that the day would come when you couldn't sell $10,000 for 1 BTC would have been considered "just dreaming".
No kidding.As for the hard limit, that would simply be a misguided concept economically if bitcoin was to seriously be a global currency (some inflation or demurrage would be necessary). But that is what buyers want - a currency that can't be printed into oblivion.
Are we talking about the psychics again?Aside from the creators and anyone who was let in on it before it became well known.
Are we talking about the psychics again?
Wow. I am only willing to cautiously say that bitcoin hasn't reached its highest price yet. You are claiming that it will "dominate the world financial markets".Who said it was a conspiracy theory? Bitcoin maxis are quite open about their intentions and goals. They want to own this currency that will dominate the world financial markets, and if I don't buy in, I can "have fun staying poor."
Don't you think that this fact would be a major impediment to bitcoin's march towards world domination?I can't remember this year's figures, but last year 0.01% of wallet addresses held around 60% of all Bitcoins in circulation.
So what do you think is really going on?I am skeptical that this is due to luck.
So we are back to "lucky" then. "Their" hopes/beliefs panned out.When I say "they" I do not mean that "I" believe something. Few understand this.
It's amazing how often the words "I disagree with you" get changed to "you are a liar".Imagine if you started engaging honestly, how much the discussion would improve.
Yes, dodging taxes, buying drugs, buying child porn, holding until one gets rich and then never buy bitcoin again Really great!![]()
I would expect investors to see this fund like the doomed micro strategy holding of Michael Saylor.This is kind of interesting - the bitcoin futures ETF by Grayscale is undervalued by a quarter. Which means that around 3% of the global bitcoin supply is stuck in a fund that is only worth 75% of the bitcoin it represents.
People who bought this fund were betting that the SEC would approve it converting from a futures ETF to a spot bitcoin market, but that's not happening. So Grayscale can sit on half a billion bitcoins and do whatever with the price spread, meaning that they make half a billion DOLLARS a year by keeping their investors in limbo.
Welcome to Grayscale's Hotel California
If it is your contention that there was something underhanded about how the early blocks were mined then you are mistaken. It's all a matter of public record.I can't remember this year's figures, but last year 0.01% of wallet addresses held around 60% of all Bitcoins in circulation. I am skeptical that this is due to luck.
If it is your contention that there was something underhanded about how the early blocks were mined then you are mistaken. It's all a matter of public record.
The Genesis block was first created on 3 January 2009 and the entity known as Satoshi Nakamoto started mining 6 days later. On February 11 2009 Nakamoto posted about bitcoin on the P2P foundation forum and included a link to the necessary software. (https://news.bitcoin.com/13-years-a...hed-the-first-forum-post-introducing-bitcoin/).
Obviously Nakamoto and those who initially decided to install the software in those early months mined the bulk of the blocks but contrary to suspicions, there was no "secret cabal" amassing huge numbers of bitcoin before letting anybody know about its existence.
Psion10 actually drags facts into the thread which I find helpful.