Beer in here!!

No offense, but I'm getting bored. When does Yahweh get home from school? Where's Mr. Krkey? Perhaps they've abandoned us and gone for non-virtual beer?
 
Spoke too soon. Mr. KrKey is here but in the wrong thread. I shall settle in now with my lovely mocha coffee...
 
EdipisReks said:
i'm drinking mandarin orange spice tea, though i had plenty of guinness for lunch. mmmmmm, guinness. what is this thead about again?
Click to expand...

I am drinking Tequiza right now. It is so good. It is beer with Blue agave nectar and lime. I am not much on beer...but love Tequiza.

I have no idea what this thread is about either!:D
 
Oh...and i'm not in my undies. I am wearing a spaghetti strap denim sundress and sandals.;)
 
Not to sober up this thread or anything, but...

I just wanted to say that since Diogenes at least accepted my offer to judge this debate, I will not be posting anything more to this particular board until the debate is over, which I expect will be in a reasonable timeframe.

I would also admonish both participants to stay on topic, and that pointing out that an opponent's argument is off-topic is considered a valid refutation of that argument.


I better stick to club soda for this.
 
Ruby said:
Oh...and i'm not in my undies. I am wearing a spaghetti strap denim sundress and sandals.;)
Click to expand...
Oddly enough, just the way you said that was...perfect.

Make mine the darkest beer you have on tap. If I can see light through it, I'm sending it back.

Lord Emsworth--I'd gladly debate materialism...but only after several of them there light-blockers...
 
::trudges in from work and strips down to his boxers::

Screwdriver, please.
 
Beleth said:
I just wanted to say that since Diogenes at least accepted my offer to judge this debate
Click to expand...

Remember that link he posted as a near fit to his beliefs? The apologist rant that said that most skeptics learned a few fallacies and went to town? I am thinking that that kind of attitude will invalidate whatever jurisdiction you wish to lay down. I'm betting my undies that krkey will claim you are biased or unfit to judge in 20 posts or less.
 
Keneke said:
I'm betting my undies that krkey will claim you are biased or unfit to judge in 20 posts or less.
Click to expand...
That's one of the reasons I will not be posting anything while the debate goes on. It is not my place to influence it, except perhaps in matters of procedure.

As anyone that has read my postings on this board over the last year can attest to, I am not at all in the hard-skeptic camp. I am, if anything, in the devil's-advocate camp. I can argue either side if called to it.

I know the value - and it is high - of an in-context quote from an authority on a subject. Krkey and Yahweh do too; I know Krkey does because they have been the meat of his arguments so far, and I know Yahweh does because he is on his school's debate team. We may be the only three people on this board who don't automatically dismiss it as an "appeal to authority" fallacy, because it isn't. (http://www.datanation.com/fallacies/aa.htm)

Like I said in another post, I'm not going to base a decision on who convinces me. I'm going to base a decision on who is more convincing.

I'm the fairest ear Krkey's likely to get here, outside of Suddenly. And I don't think Suddenly's interested in the position.
 
Sheesh!! Krkey says he wasn't planning on starting till Monday...

I'll plan on reviving both threads at that time.

Of course you are all welcome to stay in here and drink beer, or whatever tops your tank..

And please, at least turn your underwear inside out between now and Monday...
 
Ok, where the beer?

I'm not going to have to report you am I? Where's the beer?
 
More beer
pint.gif
pint.gif
pint.gif
 
krkey promises we will be rewarded with a worthy debate. I guess that means he is going to stand down and let someone else bat for him.
 
::taking a seat directly across from Ruby::


Well, I think Yahweh's winning.
 
I think that I will be quite hammered if I keep drinking beer until Monday!!! I hope this krkey guy is worth the hang over.....:)
 
Most recently krkey has said that
In the end no matter how well I do in the end it is up to the person to accept the apostles were truthful and correct about what happened on easter sunday.
Click to expand...
It just reminded me of a time, about 25 years ago, when I was supposed to bear witness against somebody who mugged me (a polite way of saying "was one of two guys who beat the bejeebers out of me"). I was ready to swear on a stack of bibles (and this was back when I was a born-again christian) that this guy who was standing trial was the guy who made sure I ate my meals through a straw for a week. How could anyone mistake an orange afro and goatee? (Hey, it was 25 years ago, he probably thought it was stylish.) Turns out it was the wrong case--they brought in my guys a bit later...there was a certain resemblance...

So the crux of krkey's argument is going to be eyewitness testimony from 2,000 years ago? Heck, I thought I was "truthful and correct", and it was something that had happened to me only a few weeks prior...let's take the years that lapsed before the writing of the gospels, and ...well...

Who's buying, again?
 
Keneke said:
How patronizing! Yeah, yeah, Yahweh may be in high school, but still.
Click to expand...
Dont worry, I dont feel patronized. I didnt expect an opening statement that would take days to write, oh well, while I am plenty confident in my debating skills, all my free time in invested into procrastinating my school work.

In the mean time, I'll grab myself a Capri Sun.

(Here is an image of a rough draft of what I am writing debate... that is the Negative side, now I have to write the Affirmative side... yeah, its time consuming...)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom