Anti_Hypeman
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2005
- Messages
- 1,007
When I first saw the cartoon I thought it was a jab at creationists. This guy is serious?
Like when someone accepts their Academy Award and thanks God for the acting help.
"Thor".bignickel said:He's saying that any scientific claim that omits god is fiction.
For instance: trying to explain 'thunder' without mentioning Zeus.
You blasphemer.
Science will never disprove God because no matter how strong the evidence for evolution, big bang, whatever, you can always just say God caused it to be that way.
Now if he's a young earth creationist, then he's a willful idiot.
There is one other (not so devine) explanation.In the case of Cher, is there any other explanation?
In the case of Cher, is there any other explanation?
AND he hides all proof from you AND he wants you to believe without proof AND he is fully capable of, and willing to, hide from you with infinite, ultimate skill.
...snip...
It's certainly funnier that way!I think I need glasses. I read the original cartoon as complaining about claims that "emit goo".
It made more sense.