• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged BBC WTC7 Programme

RKOwens4 said:
Is it just me or did Dylan Avery come off as a whiny little brat in his final interview, saying "so what" and "of course he's going to f'ing say that", etc.? I love his line, "He's part of the system, man!" LOL.
Click to expand...
No, it wasn't just you. Dylan personally made the truth movement look like a bunch of no brain idiots who have no respect for anyone. Right now, I would want to be anyone other than Dylan. In a few sweconds of stupidity he ruined his future. Chances are he will be the butt of quite a few jokes on national TV and in print. If I was a truther, i would excommunicate him from the movement...hey, I said excommunicate. Does that mean they really are the first American church of Stupid?
 
TobiasTheCommie said:
Wow, i know this is wrong.. but that fire in madrid in 2005(16:10 in the video).. damn that is beautiful.

No no, relax, i'm not going to go out and light a public building on fire.

But damn, that is beautiful
Click to expand...

Was slightly annoyed though that Gage wasn't pulled up when he tap-danced around the Madrid Towers by saying 'well the core remained standing' or something like that. Yes Richard, thats because most of that building was made of significantly more resilient reinforced concrete; that stuff which the WTC wasn't made of.
 
~enigma~ said:
No, it wasn't just you. Dylan personally made the truth movement look like a bunch of no brain idiots who have no respect for anyone. Right now, I would want to be anyone other than Dylan. In a few sweconds of stupidity he ruined his future. Chances are he will be the butt of quite a few jokes on national TV and in print. If I was a truther, i would excommunicate him from the movement...hey, I said excommunicate. Does that mean they really are the first American church of Stupid?
Click to expand...

Yeah, his outbursts plus playing down the BBC foreknowledge claim probably puts him one more loony outburst away from being outed as COINTELPRO or something.
 
By the way, as far as the Barry Jennings "controversy" about whether there were dead bodies in the lobby of WTC7, I was just thinking... earlier in the documentary we see video from inside the lobby, where there are clearly no bodies on the lobby floor, and the guy in the video says something about they're probably the last ones in there.

It's possible that one or two more people may have passed through the lobby after he and the cameraman left, but as Dylan would have us believe, there were "piles" of bodies on the lobby floor and that Jennings was stepping over them. It's pretty farfetched to assume that an entire mob of people would have for some reason gathered in the lobby after the cameraman left, in order to be killed by the collapse of the North Tower.

The video evidence speaks for itself. So does Barry Jennings.
 
RKOwens4 said:
By the way, as far as the Barry Jennings "controversy" about whether there were dead bodies in the lobby of WTC7, I was just thinking... earlier in the documentary we see video from inside the lobby, where there are clearly no bodies on the lobby floor, and the guy in the video says something about they're probably the last ones in there.

It's possible that one or two more people may have passed through the lobby after he and the cameraman left, but as Dylan would have us believe, there were "piles" of bodies on the lobby floor and that Jennings was stepping over them. It's pretty farfetched to assume that an entire mob of people would have for some reason gathered in the lobby after the cameraman left, in order to be killed by the collapse of the North Tower.

The video evidence speaks for itself. So does Barry Jennings.
Click to expand...

But you just know they're probably going to make a big deal that the guy in the lobby had what looked to me like a Secret Service vest on. What was he hiding etc?
 
Dave Rogers said:
OK, I'll freely admit that my post was intended as ironic in tone; that is to say, a form of lie in order to demonstrate the absurdity of the assumptions from which that lie is derived. How about yours?

Dave
Click to expand...

My initial post was in response to Pete Weaver who'd said that it was "Strange that only after the BBC aired their brilliant Conspiracy Files documentary which well and truly tore loose change apart, did the 'truth'ers start saying that the Beeb were in on the collapse of wtc 7. "

My response was intended to be a tad sarcastic, it was not intended to be a statement of fact, it would be impossible to prove that "most people who believe the BBC to be "in on it" thought that on the day it actually happened", as would the fact that "every single one of them kept quiet about it until after the BBC aired the Conspiracy Files documentary"

At the end of the day, does it really matter? and that was my point. :)
 
wooooody64 said:
What difference does it make when the "truthers" actually realised that the BBC reported WT7 as collapsed when it was actually standing?

The BBC still reported WT7 as collapsed, when it was actually standing.

"keeping it real" ;)
Click to expand...


You do understand that the conspiracy liars can't begin to figure out what they're alleging? Someone from the imaginary mathematically-impossible conspiracy approaches a rep of the network regarded as most implacably hostile to George Bush and hands him a script. He asks, "What is the purpose of the script"? A simple question, but one the liars haven't considered at all. If the building is not going to collapse, why the script? If the building is going to collapse, why the script?

Really stretch your imagination now. To what end would the imaginary conspiracy produce a self-indicting script for an event that either will or will not happen? Please explain this. Let's assume that everyone involved knew that the building was going to collapse: Why the script?
 
Last edited:
Just started watching this and I'm at the 15 minute mark. This completely destroys any myths surrounding WTC7.

Next time anyone says it was hardly damaged, just point them to this.
 
Last edited:
triangleBelow said:
Not super high resolution, but for those who are interested in the content and would prefer not to download the 1.2GB avi transcode doing the rounds via torrents, here is a direct rip of the file being served up via the BBC iPlayer online catch-up service, weighing in at a mere 224MB:

http: //w ww.megaupload.com/?d=VDL1FUZ3 (Remove the spaces)

(For those who haven't used Megaupload before, enter the three letters towards the top right in the box as instructed, click "Download". On the next page you will have to wait 45 seconds, then the "free download" button will appear, click that to start the download)

Video: libx264, 480x272px, 25fps, Millions of colours
Audio: AAC, Stereo, 48.000KHz
Click to expand...

For some reason when I finish this download, it says error, bad file name. Anyone else having the same problem?
 
TexasJack said:
For some reason when I finish this download, it says error, bad file name. Anyone else having the same problem?
Click to expand...
No problem here but after I saw Dylan the dodo doing an imitation of an idiot I wish I had a file error cause I was drinking a diet Pepsi and spit it all over my keyboard and monitor.
 
37 minute: Richard Gage does an Ad-hom attack on CDI and accuses them of being part of the coverup.
 
Last edited:
47 minutes: Jennings reveals the truth about the interview and why is it pulled. Interesting how Dylan and Alex Jones lied about it.
 
Last edited:
pomeroo said:
Thanks. They chatted with us for about ten minutes. I was wondering if any of it would make the final cut.
Click to expand...


Just over a minute of it made it. See ~53:48 - 54:49 of WalterEgo's video. Well done.
 
I did not like the show. Fairly shallow discussion, resulting in a he said, she said, type of argument. I would have preferred a deeper discussion on some of the points, but that's me.
 
I really like the jerk with Luke that says "We think we're being lied to and we can prove that." Can someone explain that glaring logical contradiction?
 
RKOwens4 said:
By the way, as far as the Barry Jennings "controversy" about whether there were dead bodies in the lobby of WTC7, I was just thinking... earlier in the documentary we see video from inside the lobby, where there are clearly no bodies on the lobby floor, and the guy in the video says something about they're probably the last ones in there.

It's possible that one or two more people may have passed through the lobby after he and the cameraman left, but as Dylan would have us believe, there were "piles" of bodies on the lobby floor and that Jennings was stepping over them. It's pretty farfetched to assume that an entire mob of people would have for some reason gathered in the lobby after the cameraman left, in order to be killed by the collapse of the North Tower.

The video evidence speaks for itself. So does Barry Jennings.
Click to expand...

What happened to the "of course there were bodies! It was used for triage!" debunk I read here last week?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom