• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Basic & Gross/Current?

Kumar

Unregistered
K
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
14,259
Hello,

While looking with EQUANIMITY, I felt that religious faith can be in the following type of entities or concepts?

1. Entity/concept interpreting prime/basic levels.

2. Entity/concept interpreting gross/current level.

3. Entities/concepts from Prime to Current level--i mean also intermediatories or in intermediatories.

Sometimes I feel, that worship to PRIME/Basic along with to Gross current status(but not the intermediatories(those may be respected but not followed/worshiped--to adjust environmental changes or Need of the time. Eg.. when we buy a car, we do see its material/iron but simple touch & by banging fingers with its body(its basics) AND then we also go on other details--body look latest features etc(i.e. its grosses/currents). Likewise, prime entity of anyone and teachings of parents may be more valid to a son than of other older ancesstors.

Since GOD is said to be Omipresent, we can safely consider in this referance, that all things & beings should have GOD in them. Likewise other indicated properties of God-- omniscience, omnipotence, allmighty etc. should also be there if God is there. So if we worship anything or being on gross/current level, we can safely say that we are worshiping GOD in that gross thing/being so valid.

Does it not suggest that it may not be odd if we worship everything & being even at their GROSS/CURRENT LEVEL due to omnipresence property of GOD?

Best wishes.
 
Why don't we start with proving a god exists. After that we can jump off all the other bridges like, how/when/should he/she/it be worshiped.
 
Craig4 said:
Why don't we start with proving a god exists. After that we can jump off all the other bridges like, how/when/should he/she/it be worshiped.
Click to expand...

Though I can try--logically, spritually, scientifically or practically. But I just want, since current science is anticipated as non-absolute & non-final, I want it to know first by removing its missor weakness. This not again pls:D
 
Kumar said:
Hello,

While looking with EQUANIMITY, I felt that religious faith can be in the following type of entities or concepts?

1. Entity/concept interpreting prime/basic levels.

2. Entity/concept interpreting gross/current level.

3. Entities/concepts from Prime to Current level--i mean also intermediatories or in intermediatories.

Sometimes I feel, that worship to PRIME/Basic along with to Gross current status(but not the intermediatories(those may be respected but not followed/worshiped--to adjust environmental changes or Need of the time. Eg.. when we buy a car, we do see its material/iron but simple touch & by banging fingers with its body(its basics) AND then we also go on other details--body look latest features etc(i.e. its grosses/currents). Likewise, prime entity of anyone and teachings of parents may be more valid to a son than of other older ancesstors.

Since GOD is said to be Omipresent, we can safely consider in this referance, that all things & beings should have GOD in them. Likewise other indicated properties of God-- omniscience, omnipotence, allmighty etc. should also be there if God is there. So if we worship anything or being on gross/current level, we can safely say that we are worshiping GOD in that gross thing/being so valid.

Does it not suggest that it may not be odd if we worship everything & being even at their GROSS/CURRENT LEVEL due to omnipresence property of GOD?

Best wishes.
Click to expand...

First prove that god exists. Then we can talk.
 
Kumar said:
Though I can try--logically, spritually, scientifically or practically. But I just want, since current science is anticipated as non-absolute & non-final, I want it to know first by removing its missor weakness. This not again pls:D
Click to expand...

Gibberish from you,as usual. You haven't changed a bit.
 
PixyMisa said:
Kumar, first define God. Then show that it exists. Then you can discuss how we should respond.
Click to expand...

God exist in Religion and Philosophy but may still be indescribable in modren science.

Let me indicate; ONE FORCE in all forces is GOD. If so, compare its properties with indicated God's properties, you can notice similarities. Let me feel that that force in all forces is somewhat mid line/point of force/s--eg. an imagionary midline in a way or center of thermodynamics--heat & vibrations. Somewhat shown in following animations:-

Following animation clearly show mid-line of a wave:-

StandingWavePhysics.gif


Following is a better model to explain mid-line:-

This is a better model to explain the mid line:
http://tinyurl.com/4e83u32
 
Last edited:
Craig4 said:
Sorry you need to address this before we start deciding how to respond to a god. We should first determine if one exists. Evidence please.
Click to expand...

My old friends know the meaning of "miss & weakness", absolute & final, TTTT....& wasted lot of time which I don't want again.
 
Kumar said:
My old friends know the meaning of "miss & weakness", absolute & final, TTTT....& wasted lot of time which I don't want again.
Click to expand...

Which is another way of saying you can't provide evidence of this god force thing so you're going to hand wave it off and pretend that the problem of evidence doesn't exist.
 
Craig4 said:
Which is another way of saying you can't provide evidence of this god force thing so you're going to hand wave it off and pretend that the problem of evidence doesn't exist.
Click to expand...

No, I feel I already indicated. God is the prime force exist in all forces--as center line in these in view of GOD is said to me omniptresent. We can't say God is a seprate entity from all, but is in all as center to all.
 
Kumar said:
No, I feel I already indicated. God is the prime force exist in all forces--as center line in these in view of GOD is said to me omniptresent. We can't say God is a seprate entity from all, but is in all as center to all.
Click to expand...

A claim for which you offer no evidence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom