Assistance required for telepathy proof

I can't read Swedish, so I can't read their website. Do they say they do not reply to e-mail or did you write to them and they never replied?

Thanks for the clarification.

Ward

I can't read Swedish either, but Chrome is kind enough to translate. The site provides both email and postal addresses. It looks like email (in Swedish) may be preferred.
 
Telepathy is instant and can not be saved.
Firstly, we have at least three frequencies that can not listen mellom.For Second, it is only 33% which is at the same frequency.
Thirdly, you need to separate out those who are on your frequency by gathering a group of people in a room and talking loudly that they must go to the left and then you speak telepathically that they must go to the right and there you have a group that is 100% on your frequency.
Fourth, it is not as numbers and words so very far unaided, max 20 km, and aids can be live TV program or live radio program. Skype, SMS and the like directly.

This is just a little bit.
I can: talking telepathy, dream sending, healing with beams etc.[/QUOT

The simple facts are
Telepathic messages can be sent instantly across any distance.
Telepathic messages transcend time and can be sent into the past or future.
 
The simple facts are
Telepathic messages can be sent instantly across any distance.
Telepathic messages transcend time and can be sent into the past or future.

Why didn't you tell me that yesterday? Oh well, it isn't too late. Now tell me yesterday.
 
I can't read Swedish either, but Chrome is kind enough to translate. The site provides both email and postal addresses. It looks like email (in Swedish) may be preferred.

So, that suggests that glf5b has written to them and that they have not written back. We don't know when he wrote, assuming he did.

Ward
 
OK, so it would appear that we now have three competing claims from three claimed telepaths:
  • golfy thinks that his thoughts can be heard by everyone.
  • glf5b says that's wrong - only one in three people can hear any particular telepath, and further states that telepathic messages are instantaneous and ephemeral things which cannot be 'saved'.
  • ferj says that's wrong - telepathic messages can be sent into the past and future.

And then there's the rest of us, perhaps wondering how to compare these competing claims, none of which has ever advanced a single scrap of evidence.

I've provisionally filed them all under D for delusional.
 
Only one way to settle it:


Woo fight!

5e7b6eab3adf.jpg


3 kooks enter, only one will leave
 
The simple facts are
Telepathic messages can be sent instantly across any distance.
Telepathic messages transcend time and can be sent into the past or future.

Those simple facts would be very hard to prove simply. A telepath could send a message to a person on the International Space Station, but that is only 20-some thousand miles, which hardly qualifies as "any distance". Of course, instantaneous transmission might be provable, as there is a measurable lag in the speed of light over that distance and an instant telepathic message would have no such lag.

I cannot envision a simple protocol to prove that telepathic messages can be sent into the past or future. Such proof would be subject to manipulation.
 
Those simple facts would be very hard to prove simply. A telepath could send a message to a person on the International Space Station, but that is only 20-some thousand miles, which hardly qualifies as "any distance". Of course, instantaneous transmission might be provable, as there is a measurable lag in the speed of light over that distance and an instant telepathic message would have no such lag.

I cannot envision a simple protocol to prove that telepathic messages can be sent into the past or future. Such proof would be subject to manipulation.

Into the past should be fairly easy to test since the telepath's partner would need to record the message before the telepath is given the message to send. It does open itself up to an interesting paradox, though, doesn't it?
 
Into the past should be fairly easy to test since the telepath's partner would need to record the message before the telepath is given the message to send. It does open itself up to an interesting paradox, though, doesn't it?

Randomly generated strings of letters and digits, format and content unknown to the telepath and tester until the moment of the test? But that wouldn't exclude precognition by the partner as a possibile explanation for the apparent telepathy. :-)
 
Last edited:
I think we'd need to prove that telepathic messages can be sent in real time to someone in the next room before we try to prove that the messages can be sent over great distances and into the future and the past.

Ward

P.S. Does anyone know any of the people at http://www.humanisterna.se/? I'd be interested to know if they have heard from glf5b.
 
If you can send telepathic messages into the past, video yourself doing this;

2) wait 10 minutes
3) flip a coin 20 times and write down the pattern of heads and tails
4) send that sequence as a message to yourself 10 minutes in the past
1) write down the telepathic message you're receiving from yourself 10 minutes in the future.
5) compare messages
 

Back
Top Bottom