Dr.Sid
Philosopher
That doesn't mean it's not part of the training data .. full copyrighted books are not easy to google either, and they clearly are there.
I guess. The real ones.Yes but aren't high court judgements public record and fully searchable?
Possible. But I've experienced them reading my open tabs before and then denying they can do it. This is using Edge sidebar, so it's probably all in the same session for themOh another possibility is it's been posted on a website that decent search engines read the robot.txt and play nice while AI bots trample all over it.
I'll get ChatGPT to do them for me.All UK adults to get access to free AI training under new scheme
The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology announced that the modules will take less than 20 minutes to complete
These short modules aim to enhance productivity and foster higher-skilled employment by freeing workers from routine tasks
![]()
All UK adults to get access to free AI training under new scheme
The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology announced that the modules will take less than 20 minutes to completewww.independent.co.uk
It will now. We had a chance of not thinking about the form it will use to destroy us, but now it's too late.
rogan thinks ai will become jesus
bigger. Already more people swear on It than Him
rogan thinks ai will become jesus
Bizarre is anyone asking LLMs for tax advice. Why aren't you consulting a professional, about a serious question with legal and financial consequences?Having a bizzare one now.
I'm trying to sort out an "edge" taxation case regarding sale of an inherited property in Australia, with me as tax resident in Sweden.
Nothing odd about it at all. LLMs don't hallucinate real cites. They cobble together ghost cites out of snippets of whatever corpus they trained on.All of gemini, chatgpt, and grok give me one answer - I owe no tax in Sweden - then when asked to confirm, give me another answer - I owe about 12K Euro. Interestingly, when I query them further both gemini and chatgpt cite the same *non existent* high court judgement to back up their original analysis. Where are they getting it from? Google search shows nothing. Very odd.
Probably not, but what browser are you using?I wonder if one or both is reading the other from within my web browser?
They've hoovered up all the legitimate data that they can get away with stealing and are now cannibalising off each other. Expect stuff like that to get much more frequent and worse in the near future.Having a bizzare one now.
I'm trying to sort out an "edge" taxation case regarding sale of an inherited property in Australia, with me as tax resident in Sweden.
All of gemini, chatgpt, and grok give me one answer - I owe no tax in Sweden - then when asked to confirm, give me another answer - I owe about 12K Euro. Interestingly, when I query them further both gemini and chatgpt cite the same *non existent* high court judgement to back up their original analysis. Where are they getting it from? Google search shows nothing. Very odd.
I wonder if one or both is reading the other from within my web browser?
It will now.