• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Artificial Intelligence

Indeed. The still cameras mentioned obviously cannot film a motion picture. In the context of those cameras (both made by Graflex), the "top hat" is a lens extension that gives a longer focal length than is possible with the integrated bellows. It obviously has no connection to the 1925 Fred Astaire movie. And to add insult to injury, the camera pictured is neither of the ones mentioned in the answer text—it's a Kodak fixed-focus camera.
 
I'm in some solar tech forums, and the AI answers are more often completely wrong than right....
If they are wrong so often in an area I have expertise in, it doesn't give me much faith in its accuracy in other areas...
 
I say it's technically not lying, as the program is doing the same procedure as when it is giving back accurate results.
There is no intentional deception, as the program literally doesn't know right from wrong, as it as no model of reality to refer to.
 
Every company seems to be advertising using "AI" now.

AI is pretty much now just another word for "computing".
 
The Great Zaganza said:
I say it's technically not lying, as the program is doing the same procedure as when it is giving back accurate results.
There is no intentional deception, as the program literally doesn't know right from wrong, as it as no model of reality to refer to.
Click to expand...
So (the law of etc) it is not “intelligent” enough to know it is wrong, or when it is wrong.
Why call it an hallucination when “it” doesn’t even know what it is doing?
It’s the preciousness of this pretence of hallucination that irritates me. It may not be lying - it is the programmers pretence that sticks in my craw.
 
Last edited:
You mean erroneous responses that, like a stopped clock, are occasionally near to being somewhat correct.
i.e., it is wrong
It is the affectation of calling BS hallucination that is my complaint. Explaining that its contemplations are always BS is not helping me review my opinion.
 
Last edited:
EHocking said:
I hate the ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ “hallucinations” excuse for AI.

Just say WRONG!!!!
Click to expand...
I think we need both "wrong" and "hallucinations". Hallucinations aren't just it being wrong, it's about it making stuff up, it's the difference between a ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ and someone making a mistake.
 
Not yet. Downloaded it on my iPad, going to try its coding responses when I do an update to my web store.
 
From descriptions its censoring is like ChatGPT used to do, I.e. starts to give an uncensored answer and then wipes it as you watch.
 
zooterkin said:
James O'Malley has a piece on why DeepSeek doesn't mean the end of ChatGPT and friends. A more efficient use of resources will mean the existing computational capacity can be used to do more.

takes.jamesomalley.co.uk

DeepSeek isn't a victory for the AI sceptics

Am I mad... or is everyone else?
takes.jamesomalley.co.uk takes.jamesomalley.co.uk
Click to expand...
As any programmer, sorry software engineer will tell you that extra capacity will be used.
 
Darat said:
From descriptions its censoring is like ChatGPT used to do, I.e. starts to give an uncensored answer and then wipes it as you watch.
Click to expand...
Yes, there's clearly some other system watching over it. The model itself is not censored, I've tried 14b subset on my computer and it can write poems about oppression in China all day long.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom