Arguments on Edgar Cayce

I opened this thread this morning but didn't get a chance to read it. So tonight after work I got myself a coffee and a hand full of almonds and sat down to read it. Unfortunately, I didn't count them but at a guess there were roughly 24 of them. Believe this or not but it is true.

Okay, I just grabbed another handful - there were only 17 :(
 
So by my maths that's 41 almonds. Or In Edgar Cayce terms, you're without doubt gonna be protected from the big C for at least another 14 days. :)
 
I didn't eat the second lot. It was just a trial to see how many in a handful.
 
My question isn't about Cayce here, but about a guy like him. I think Arigo is the name. I listened to an episode of "The Paracast" and the hosts spoke very well of Arigo and his channel (spirit guide?) Dr. Fritz. They seem to believe that Arigo has been proven. Is this true? I've found lots of links supporting that belief, but no good skeptical ones. Is Arigo the one guy who seems to have been genuine?
A bit of a rant about that show, (sorry!) but one poster expressed his doubts and one of the hosts berated him by saying stuff like, "and all those people gain what by lying? Is my brother lying? He SAW the guy heal! And we do this show and gain NOTHING! How can you say Arigo was a fake?"
I brought up the point that just because geuinely believe they see something doesn't make them automatically correct. But other posters chimed in and said that people who have nothing to gain are better and more credible than people who do. (Sigh.)
 
I cannot comment on Arigo because I've never heard of him and what he claims to do and what evidence there may be for it. Maybe he is the one and only true healer. Who knows.

But there is always a payoff.
Not always money.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom