I watched a show on Discovery Science where it was claimed that crop circles has been around for hundreds of years (300 years was mentioned) and that some aspects of crop circles cannot easily be explained by hoaxters.
Two features that would signify a real crop circle was (1) Damage to the crop that could only be explained by microwave radiation. (2) Particles of iron metal found distributed in the circle.
Then they got a group of students to replicate even these features using a portable homemade magnetron and a pyrotechnic bomb containing iron powder.
Now I don't particulary trust Discovery ever since they put on John Edwards explaining how transplanted organs can carry over memories so I ask if anyone has any insight into crop circles.
If we forget the elaborate crop circles that could hardly have formed naturally and which the show didnt try to pretend that they were anything than the works of hoaxters. I'm refering to simple circles that in my view might have been formed by a meteorite, you have the intense heat though not microwave and you have the iron particles from the meteorite itself. I dont know if meteorites have a high explanatory value, thats just the first thought I had.
Did Discovery tell the truth about the documentation of crop circles going back hundreds of years? In skeptic literature it has always been that the whole thing started when two buddies got liquered up on the english countryside.
Two features that would signify a real crop circle was (1) Damage to the crop that could only be explained by microwave radiation. (2) Particles of iron metal found distributed in the circle.
Then they got a group of students to replicate even these features using a portable homemade magnetron and a pyrotechnic bomb containing iron powder.
Now I don't particulary trust Discovery ever since they put on John Edwards explaining how transplanted organs can carry over memories so I ask if anyone has any insight into crop circles.
If we forget the elaborate crop circles that could hardly have formed naturally and which the show didnt try to pretend that they were anything than the works of hoaxters. I'm refering to simple circles that in my view might have been formed by a meteorite, you have the intense heat though not microwave and you have the iron particles from the meteorite itself. I dont know if meteorites have a high explanatory value, thats just the first thought I had.
Did Discovery tell the truth about the documentation of crop circles going back hundreds of years? In skeptic literature it has always been that the whole thing started when two buddies got liquered up on the english countryside.