April Stundie Nomination thread

I nominate Fonebone:

Fonebone said:
Only the absurd theory that concludes that the short lived fires from aviation kerosene caused the concrete reinforced steel cores to melt to a degree that caused a global symmetrical infrastructure to fail has been completely eliminated...
Click to expand...

Wow - five strawmen in one sentence!
 
A classic leap of logic:

It has finally come to it. We can’t trust anyone anymore. We need to find out who perpetrated the heinous acts on September 11th, 2001. As it has become evident that evidence and science isn’t going to help us in our quest for Truth™, it’s down to process of elimination.
Click to expand...
http://911alibi.wordpress.com/


ETA: Apparently this site is a spoof: I blame my erroneous nomination on lack of coffee (I work nights and it's the middle of the day) and a belief that this was not past most of the "truthers" I have encountered.
 
Last edited:
Red3 said:
I hate the way CTists talk about information in that all knowing way...It makes me sick.
Click to expand...

QFT!!!

Here is a guy I've been having a debate with on youtube. He calls himself "gunthaarz".. He just shot me this dizzying "scientific" analogy, and it just blew my mind..


Just a simple demonstration: take the armor of a military tank, the M1 Abrahms if you will. measure the thickness of its steel.

Now think: what is armor piercing ammunition? It is specially designed projectiles launched at SUPRA-sonic speeds to be _able_ at all to penetrate it's target.

In the projectile one often utilizes the heaviest of materials: tungsten and DU.

Now. The walls of the WTC were DOUBLE panels of several inches thick industrial steel.

You and others are telling us that fire and soft flimsy aluminum planes at SUB-sonic speeds could actually _penetrate_ solid steel walls.

if this was the case... why bother designing bunker buster bombs? Just dump old planes on targets!

I _can_ make this even more scientific for you if you so desire
Click to expand...

I like that he doesn't realize that the exterior columns that the "aluminum plane" penetrated in the wtc were entirely made of steel..
He basically debunks his own analogy..
 
Last edited:
Gangularis said:
QFT!!!

Here is a guy I've been having a debate with on youtube. He calls himself "gunthaarz".. He just shot me this dizzying "scientific" analogy, and it just blew my mind..




I like that he doesn't realize that the exterior columns that the "aluminum plane" penetrated in the wtc were entirely made of steel..
Click to expand...



It's that last line "I _can_ make this even more scientific for you if you so desire" that really sells it. Even more scientific? Gosh!
 
Horatius said:
It's that last line "I _can_ make this even more scientific for you if you so desire" that really sells it. Even more scientific? Gosh!
Click to expand...

Yeah? So what?

He could still bring in pizza boxes and chicken wired cages. Or skirts and legs for that matter. There are many more scientific paths left unwandered.

:p
 
Horatius said:
It's that last line "I _can_ make this even more scientific for you if you so desire" that really sells it. Even more scientific? Gosh!
Click to expand...

I liked:

Now. The walls of the WTC were DOUBLE panels of several inches thick industrial steel.



Four inch thick solid steel walls!:jaw-dropp
 
Imagine what picture someone in the future could build about how the twin towers were built/looked etc. if they only had CTists descriptions to go on!
 
tsig said:
I liked:

Now. The walls of the WTC were DOUBLE panels of several inches thick industrial steel.



Four inch thick solid steel walls!:jaw-dropp
Click to expand...
too bad they didnt have any windows, then maybe they would have been able to rent out space and they wouldnt be half empty and losing money :D
 
http://www.freedomcrowsnest.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=84039&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=90

Orphia said:
" Science is organized common sense where many a beautiful theory was killed by an ugly fact". - Thomas Huxley

UFOs/aliens visiting Earth is a beautiful theory, but the ugly fact is that no-one has proved it's happened.

We should still discuss alleged sightings and give them due attention, but we must not be blind to terrestrial explanations.

Spec said:
Experiences differ from one human to another... it is not necessary to provide proof of anything... and as if! :newlol ...we can't prove everything - and again, it is foolish to believe that in order to believe anything, you need some kind of hard material evidence, else it doesn't exist...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
sylvan8798 said:
There are no words.

Post by 7:
"If it's true that FD made the decision to pull 7, that doesn't mean they themselves had to push the button or gas pedal or whatever the hell would have needed to be done to actually drop 7. They could have just ordered it done by whoever handled the demolition."

http://forum.thedailyshow.com/tds/b...hread.id=34081&view=by_date_ascending&page=11 (POST 109)
Click to expand...

I don't think this should be overlooked. How did he come up with the idea of a gas pedal-triggered bomb?
 
Gangularis said:
I like that he doesn't realize that the exterior columns that the "aluminum plane" penetrated in the wtc were entirely made of steel..
He basically debunks his own analogy..
Click to expand...

I thought that was the whole point of his post. Aluminium plane can't penetrate steel, WTC was steel, therefore it wasn't a plane.

I think the best part is the implication that a tank would survive having an airliner crash into it at 500mph.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom