Hojatoleslam Kazeem Sedighi told reporters that “many women who do not dress modestly…. lead young men astray, corrupt their chastity and spread adultery in society, which consequently increases earthquakes.” There are women in the Islamic Republic regions that are held down by the law to cover their bodies from head to toe with clothing. There are lots of women in these areas, especially among young people who are disobeying these laws and are rebelling against the strict clothing rules and have been found wearing tight coats and scarves that are pulled back and in the end show a lot of their hair. Sedighi is saying that we are all going to be buried under the rubble and that if women continue to act this way that the matter will only grow worse and earthquakes will continue to greatly affect our regions.
If you compare the numbers of promiscuously dressed women in, say, Germany or England with Iran, and then the number, strength and lethality of earthqukes since, say, 1979 (Iranian revolution), in those countries, you might reconsider...
- Iran: at least 13 earthquakes magnitude 6 or higher, with a total of at least 77,000 deaths
- Germany: 0 earthquake magnitude 6 or higher, 1 death in a 5.9 quake
- England: 0 earthquakes 6 or higher, 0 deaths
If female clothing styles cause earthquakes, they've been doing some things terribly wrong in Iran lately...
If you compare the numbers of promiscuously dressed women in, say, Germany or England with Iran, and then the number, strength and lethality of earthqukes since, say, 1979 (Iranian revolution), in those countries, you might reconsider...
- Iran: at least 13 earthquakes magnitude 6 or higher, with a total of at least 77,000 deaths
- Germany: 0 earthquake magnitude 6 or higher, 1 death in a 5.9 quake
- England: 0 earthquakes 6 or higher, 0 deaths
If female clothing styles cause earthquakes, they've been doing some things terribly wrong in Iran lately...
Maybe he's got it the wrong way around and it's the lack of promiscuity
that causes earthquakes?
So I am very strongly in favour of a little more promiscuity![]()
"So, Baby, did the Earth move for you? No? Well, we're obviously not being promiscuous enough."
I like the way all you skeptics come over as if you are doing the world a public service, while making out that doubters of the "Official Theory" are all deranged "Chicken Little" types.
The laws of probability alone say that you can't all be right, and your "opponents" are all wrong. That's got to be at least as unlikely as a terrorist's passport being found undamaged amid tons of debris.
The "We eventually have to get one right just by random chance!" Argument. Someone come up with a nice Latin term for that fallacy.
DC's a slave?![]()
"So, Baby, did the Earth move for you? No? Well, we're obviously not being promiscuous enough."

I think its because he knows, and the top powers that be know, that if they killed him, he can cause more trouble in the next dimension for them here, than he can here alive.
This is my opinion, from my own experience.
User dontbeafraid, commenting on why the powers that be haven't bumped David Ickes off ... yet. What got me is how he knows this from his experience.
User dontbeafraid, commenting on why the powers that be haven't bumped David Ickes off ... yet. What got me is how he knows this from his experience.
he can cause more trouble in the next dimension for them here, than he can here alive.